K120059 · Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc. · KMF · May 17, 2012 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K120059
Device Name
LIQUID BANDAGE
Applicant
Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc.
Product Code
KMF · General Hospital
Decision Date
May 17, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5090
Device Class
Class 1
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The device is indicated for managing signs and symptoms of nail dystrophy, i.e., nail splitting and nail fragility, for intact or damaged nails. The device coats and adheres to the nail surface preventing direct abrasion and friction on the nail surface while also providing protection against the effects of moisture.
Device Story
Biocompatible, polymeric lacquer (poly(urea-urethane) in organic solvents) applied directly to nail surface; dries rapidly to form transparent, colorless, flexible, waterproof film. Used for managing nail dystrophy symptoms (splitting, fragility) by providing physical barrier against abrasion, friction, and moisture. Intended for prescription or OTC use; applied once daily. Protects keratin grooves of nail from environmental factors. Clinical safety supported by six-month application study.
Clinical Evidence
Safety supported by a clinical study involving application to the nail for approximately six months. Preclinical evidence includes biocompatibility testing (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, mutagenicity, implantation) and bench testing (molecular weight, water content, drying time, viscosity, moisture vapor transmission, tensile strength, and extraction studies).
Technological Characteristics
Poly(urea-urethane) polymer in organic solvents. Liquid-to-film forming lacquer. Biocompatibility per ISO-10993. Bench testing includes viscosity, moisture vapor transmission rate, and tensile strength analysis.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with nail dystrophy, including nail splitting and fragility, for both intact and damaged nails.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A liquid bandage is a sterile device that is a liquid, semiliquid, or powder and liquid combination used to cover an opening in the skin or as a dressing for burns. The device is also used as a topical skin protectant.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a black chess knight piece inside of a circle. The knight is facing left and has a detailed mane. The circle has a thin black border. The image is black and white.
MAY 17 2012
# ChessonLabs
# 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and CFR 807.92.
510(k) owner's name: Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc. Address: 603 Ellis Road, Durham, North Carolina 27703 Phone and fax numbers: (919) 957-1797, (919) 957-7072 Name of contact person: Lance L. Swick, Ph.D. Date of Summary: May 15, 2011
### Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc.
{1}------------------------------------------------
K.J.Oorg
2/3
Name of device:
Trade or proprietary name: to be determined
Common or usual name: Liquid bandage
Classification name: CFR 880,5090 Class I
Legally marketed device to which equivalence is claimed: Ecocel® [K0830871
Product description:
This product for nail dystrophy is a biocompatible, polymeric lacquer that is applied directly to the nail. The product is dispersed in a solution that dries rapidly, adhering to the contours of the nail to form a transparent, colorless, flexible, waterproof barrier.
Intended use of device:
[The device] is indicated for managing signs and symptoms of nail dystrophy, i.e., nail splitting and nail fragility, for intact or damaged nails. [The device] coats and adheres to the nail surface preventing direct abrasion and friction on the nail surface while also providing protection aqainst the effects of moisture.
Technological characteristics:
Biocompatibility of the product was evaluated per ISO-10993 for cytotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation, acute systemic toxicity, genotoxicity, mutagenicity, and implantation. Twelve different types of tests were run and the product was shown to be biocompatible.
Bench testing of the bulk formulation and packaged product included molecular weight, water content, setting/drying time, viscosity, percent solids, color and particulates, heat of polymerization, as well as moisture vapor transmission rate, tensile strength, aqueous and acetonitrile extractions of the dried film to confirm absence of degradation products, and distribution/ship tests of the packaged product. Performance characteristics of the product are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate device.
Chesson Labs has submitted summaries of preclinical lab test results, including determinations for anti-abrasion and evaluations for film-forming capacity, friction, and protective properties against chemical agents. Safety of the product was further defined in a clinical study where the product was applied to the nail for approximately six months.
Chesson Labs believes the preclinical studies, clinical safety studies and information comparing the products technological features provided in the application demonstrate the product's substantial equivalence.
| Parameter | Device | Predicate Device |
|------------------|-------------------------------------|------------------|
| Device Name | TBD | Ecocel |
| Company Name | Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc. | Polichem S.A. |
| 510[k] # | TBD | K083087 |
| Class | I | I |
| 21 CFR Number | 880.5090 | 880.5090 |
| Code | KMF | KMF |
| Code Description | Liquid bandage | Liquid bandage |
Summary of New Device to Predicate Devices
Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc.
Nail Dystrophy Product
{2}------------------------------------------------
K120057
5/3
| Parameter | Device | Predicate Device |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Product Type | Device | Device |
| Format | Applicator | Applicator |
| Ancillary Components | None | None |
| Intended Use | Indicated for managing signs and<br>symptoms of nail dystrophy, i.e., nail<br>splitting and nail fragility, for intact or<br>damaged nails. Product coats and<br>adheres to the nail surface preventing<br>direct abrasion and friction on the nail<br>surface while also providing<br>protection against the effects of<br>moisture. | Indicated to protect intact or<br>damaged nails from the effects of<br>moisture, friction (rubbing) or shear<br>(tearing), relieving symptoms and<br>signs of nail dystrophy (i.e. nail<br>splitting and fragility). |
| End Use | Prescription, OTC | Prescription, OTC |
| Frequency of Use | Once daily | Once daily |
| Components | Poly(urea-urethane) polymer in<br>organic solvents | Hydroxypropyl-chitosan, equisetum<br>arvense and methyl sulfonyl<br>methane in organic solvents |
| Testing | Biocompatibility; preclinical studies;<br>laboratory studies; clinical studies | Biocompatibility; preclinical studies;<br>laboratory studies; clinical studies;<br>post-market experience in Europe |
Comparison Statement:
Chesson Labs' product is similar to the predicate device in that it provides the same functions as Ecocel®, has similar claims, and has similar indications for use. Both of these products are liquid solutions applied directly to the nail, which upon contact with the nail dry to form a film. They have many of the same functional characteristics, such as ability to cover the keratin grooves of the nail as well as protect the nail from exposure to environmental factors.
Results of biocompatibility and design verification testing have demonstrated that the Chesson Labs' product has the same descriptive, technical, and safety characteristics and therefore raises no new no new issues of safety or effectiveness. The Chesson Labs' product to manage symptoms and signs of nail dystrophy has similar technological characteristics as the previously cleared product [Ecocel; K083087]. Chesson Labs has considered the impact upon safety resulting from the extended duration of product use and has supported the safety for the new intended use of this product in clinical studies.
Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc.
Nail Dystrophy Product
{3}------------------------------------------------
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles an eagle or bird in flight, composed of three curved lines.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
MAY 1 7 2012
Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc. % Lance Swick, Ph.D. 603 Ellis Road Durham, North Carolina 27703
Re: K120059
Trade/Device Name: Liquid Bandage Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5090 Regulation Name: Liquid bandage Regulatory Class: Class I Product Code: KMF Dated: April 30, 2012 Received: May 03, 2012
#### Dear Dr. Swick:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you: however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Lance Swick, Ph.D.
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.ham.
Sincerely yours,
yours,
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
K130059
### Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): __
Device Name: TBD
Indications for Use:
[The device] is indicated for managing signs and symptoms of nail dystrophy, i.e., nail splitting and nail fragility, for intact or damaged nails. [The device] coats and adheres to the nail surface preventing direct abrasion and friction on the nail surface while also providing protection against the effects of moisture.
Prescription Use __ × (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use *X*
(21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(Division Sign-Off)
Chesson Laboratory Associates, Inc.
Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, Nail Dystrophy Product and Restorative Devices Confidential, Chesson Labs Proprietary Content
510(k) Number K200591
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.