K112162 · Mis Implants Technologies , Ltd. · DZE · Aug 8, 2012 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K112162
Device Name
CONICAL CONNECTION IMPLANTS
Applicant
Mis Implants Technologies , Ltd.
Product Code
DZE · Dental
Decision Date
Aug 8, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.3640
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K112162 · Aug 8, 2012
CONICAL CONNECTION IMPLANTS
Mis Implants Technologies , Ltd.
Clinical case studies
A preliminary clinical evaluation of the Conical Connection Implants was conducted using retrospective case studies to demonstrate device stability.
Case studies; Clinical evaluation; Dental implant stability
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Preliminary clinical evaluation; Retrospective case studies; Follow-up/Duration: 6 months
Patients receiving Conical Connection Implants
Not applicable for this study
Implant stability
Indications for Use
MIS Conical Connection Implants are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function. When a one stage surgical procedure is applied, the implant may be immediately loaded when good primary stability is achieved and the occlusal load is appropriate.
Device Story
Conical connection dental implants are self-tapping, root-form, two-piece screw-type devices. Implants are surgically placed in the upper or lower jaw by dental professionals to support prosthetic devices like artificial teeth. The system includes cover screws, healing caps, abutments, and superstructures. The device features a 6-degree internal conical connection with a six-position anti-rotation index to ensure a stable seal. Implants are available in 3.75, 4.2, and 5.0 mm diameters with lengths ranging from 8 to 16 mm. The surface is sand-blasted and acid-etched. The device restores patient chewing function by providing a stable foundation for dental prosthetics.
Clinical Evidence
Preliminary clinical evaluation based on case studies with six months of follow-up; results showed good stability of the conical connection implant. Fatigue testing was performed as bench testing.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Ti6Al4V ELI (ASTM F 136-08). Design: Self-tapping, root-form, two-piece screw-type. Connection: 6-degree internal conical with 6-position anti-rotation index. Surface: Sand-blasted, acid-etched, and anodized. Diameters: 3.75, 4.2, 5.0 mm. Lengths: 8-16 mm. Sterile, single-use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring dental implants in the upper or lower jaw to support prosthetic devices and restore chewing function. Suitable for one-stage surgical procedures with immediate loading if primary stability and occlusal load conditions are met.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K112162
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for MIS Implants Technologies Ltd. The logo features the letters "MIS" in a stylized font, with the "S" being a curved line. To the right of the letters is the text "Implants Technologies Ltd." in a smaller font. The logo is simple and modern, and the text is clear and easy to read.
AUG 8 2012
t.
## 510(k) Summary:
#### Conical Connection Dental Implants
Company Name: MIS Implants Technologies Ltd. P.O. Box 7, Bar Lev Industrial Park, 20156, ISRAEL Telephone: +972-4-9016800 Fax: +972-4-9918623
Establishment Registration Number: 3004203816
| Contact Name: | Iman Khorshid<br>VP QA & RA<br>Telephone: +972-4-9016800<br>Fax: +972-4-9918623 |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | E-mail: iman@mis-implants.com |
| US Agent: | Matti Weisman - VP Marketing |
US Agent:
Motti Weisman - VP Marketing MIS Implants Technologies Inc. 14-25 Plaza Rd. Suite S-3-5 Fair Lawn New Jersey; 07410 Phone: (201) 797-9144 (201) 797-9145 Fax: E-mail: service@misimplants.com
Date prepared: July 13, 2011
Trade Name: Conical Connection Implants
Classification name: Implants, Endosseous, Root Form
Common/usual name: Dental Implant
Product Code: DZE; NHA
Regulation No.: 872.3640
Class: II
Panel identification: Dental Devices Panel
510 (k) Conical Connection Implants Section E - Page 1 of 4
{1}------------------------------------------------
# molams Technologies Ltd.
#### Predicate Device:
MIS Implants Technologies Ltd. dental implants Seven, Biocom and Lance, cleared under 510(k) K040807.
#### Description of the device:
The conical connection dental implants are self tapping, root-form, two piece screw type dental implants, indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient chewing function. The conical connection dental implants are provided in 3.75, 4.2 and 5.0 mm diameters and with the following lengths:
0 3.75mm diameter: 8mm, 10mm, 11.5mm, 13mm and 16mm
0 4.2mm diameter: 8mm, 10mm, 11.5mm, 13mm and 16mm
o 5.0mm diameter: 8mm, 10mm, 11.5mm, 13mm and 16mm
The implants surface is sand blasted and acid etched .
The conical connection dental implants are two piece devices whereas the implant is to be used in combination with cover screws, healing caps, abutments and superstructures.
The conical connection dental implants are made of Ti6AL4V ELI complying with standard ASTM F 136-08- Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant. The conical connection dental implants were modified to integrate a new type of connection, internal conical connection of 6 degrees with an anti-rotation index of six positions, ensuring a more definite seal and a more stable connection.
510 (k) Conical Connection Implants Section E - Page 2 of 4
{2}------------------------------------------------
# lmplants Technologies Ltd. Indications for Use:
MIS Conical Connection Implants are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.
When a one stage surgical procedure is applied, the implant may be immediately loaded when good primary stability is achieved and the occlusal load is appropriate.
#### Substantial Equivalence:
- Technological characteristics comparative table: .
| | Conical Connection Implants from<br>MIS Implants Technologies Ltd. | Seven, Biocom and Lance<br>Implants from MIS Implants<br>Technologies Ltd. |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510(k) number | K112162 | K040807 |
| Product Code | DZE/NHA | DZE/NHA |
| Indications For Use | MIS Conical Connection Implants<br>are intended to be surgically<br>placed in the bone of the upper or<br>lower jaw arches to provide<br>support for prosthetic devices,<br>such as artificial teeth, in order to<br>restore a patient's chewing<br>function.<br><br>When a one stage surgical<br>procedure is applied, the implant<br>may be immediately loaded when<br>good primary stability is achieved<br>and the occlusal load is<br>appropriate. | MIS dental implants are<br>intended to be surgically placed<br>in the bone of the upper or lower<br>jaw arches to provide support for<br>prosthetic devices, such as<br>artificial teeth, in order to restore<br>a patient's chewing function. |
| Supplied Sterile | Yes | Yes |
| Re-use | No | No |
| Material of Construction | Titanium Alloy - Ti6Al4V ELI | Titanium Alloy - Ti6Al4V ELI |
| Surface treatment | Sand blasted, acid etched and<br>anodized | Sand blasted and acid etched |
| Shape | Screw type | Screw type |
| Thread Diameter | 3.75, 4.2 and 5.0 mm | 3.75, 4.2 and 5.0 mm |
| Length | 8, 10, 11.5, 13 and 16 mm | 8, 10, 11.5, 13 and 16 mm |
| Internal Connection | Conical | Hexagonal |
| Abutments | Straight and up to 25° angled | Straight and up to 25° angled |
510 (k) Conical Connection Implants Section E - Page 3 of 4
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Implants Technologies Ltd. | | |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Conical Connection Implants from<br>MIS Implants Technologies Ltd. | Seven, Biocom and Lance<br>Implants from MIS Implants<br>Technologies Ltd. |
| Material of Construction of<br>Abutments | Titanium Alloy – Ti6Al4V ELI | Titanium Alloy – Ti6Al4V ELI |
| Surface treatment of<br>Abutments | Anodized | None |
| Abutments Connection | Conical | Hexagonal |
- Non clinical tests: .
Fatigue test was performed on MIS conical connection implants and its results were found comparable to those of their predicate devices.
- Clinical tests: .
A preliminary clinical evaluation, based on case studies with six months follow up has been performed, showing good stability of the conical connection implant.
#### Conclusion:
The evaluation of the conical connection dental implants does not raise any additional concerns regarding safety and effectiveness and may therefore be considered substantially equivalent to its predicate device.
510 (k) Conical Connection Implants Section E - Page 4 of 4
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract image of an eagle.
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
> AUG · 8 2012
Ms. Iman Khorshid Vice President of Quality Assurance & Regulatory Affairs MIS Implants Technologies Limited P.O. Box 7, Bar Lev Industrial Park 20156. Israel
Re: K112162
Trade/Device Name: MIS Conical Connection Implants Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3640 Regulation Name: Endosseous Dental Implant Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DZE, NHA Dated: July 26, 2012 Received: July 27, 2012
Dear Ms. Khorshid:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The I ou may) ateres provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2- Ms. Khorshid
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean I hat FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must or any I vith all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set de rece related adverse overse) (2 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please n you accirc specific ad 1705 coutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.html for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
h for
Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
#### Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/0 description: The image shows the word "mis" in a bold, sans-serif font. The letters are black against a white background. The "m" is stylized with sharp angles, the "i" is a simple vertical line with a dot above, and the "s" is curved. To the right of the word "mis" is the beginning of another word, "imp".
Implants Technologies Ltd.
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE
510(k) Number (if known):
K112162
Device Name:
Conical Connection Implants
Indications for Use:
MIS Conical Connection Implants are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for mrule bone of the upper of artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.
When a one stage surgical procedure is applied, the implant may be when a one bago barge barge good primary stability is achieved and the occlusal load is appropriate.
OR X Prescription Use _ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over the Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE -CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Surer Purre
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number: K112162
510 (k) Conical Connection Implants Section D- Page 1 of 1
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.