K111717 · Electro-Cap Intl., Inc. · GYB · Jan 5, 2012 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K111717
Device Name
ELECTRO-GEL
Applicant
Electro-Cap Intl., Inc.
Product Code
GYB · Neurology
Decision Date
Jan 5, 2012
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.1275
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
Electro-Gel is intended for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings from humans. It is used with external electrodes as the conductor between the scalp and the (recessed) electrodes. It also reduces impedance (resistance to alternating current) between the electrode surface and the skin.
Device Story
Electro-Gel is a water-miscible, conductive gel applied topically to intact skin. It serves as an interface between the scalp and external (recessed) electrodes during EEG/EP recordings. By reducing impedance between the electrode surface and the skin, it facilitates the transfer of electrical brain activity to EEG or computer equipment. The gel is used by neurologists in clinical and research settings. It is a non-sterile, salt-based (NaCl) formulation containing thickening agents, emulsifiers, humectants, and preservatives. The device is intended for single recording sessions not exceeding 8 hours. It provides a stable conductive path, ensuring signal quality for diagnostic neurophysiological procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Device underwent biocompatibility testing per ISO 10993, including Agar Diffusion (ISO 10993-5, -12), Primary Skin Irritation (ISO 10993-10, -12), and Buehler Sensitization (ISO 10993-10, -12). Device passed all tests. Internal quality control testing performed for pH (4.5-6.0), viscosity (575-615 cp), and impedance (≤0.5K/Ohms).
Indicated for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings in adults and children. Used as a conductive medium between scalp and external electrodes to reduce skin-electrode impedance. Contraindicated for contact exceeding 8 hours per session.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Electroconductive media are the conductive creams or gels used with external electrodes to reduce the impedance (resistance to alternating current) of the contact between the electrode surface and the skin.
{0}------------------------------------------------
## K111717
## 510K summary
| Company Name: | Electro-Cap International, Inc.<br>1011 West Lexington Road<br>P.O. Box 87<br>Eaton, OH 45320 | |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Contact: | Amy Swallows | |
| Phone: | 937-456-6099 | |
| Fax: | 937-456-7323 | |
| Summary Date: | June 15, 2011 (Revised December 30, 2011) | |
| Trade Name: | Electro-Gel | |
| Common Name: | Electrode Gel | |
| Classification Name: | Media, Electroconductive | |
| Regulation Number: | 21 CFR 882.1275 | |
| Product Code: | GYB | |
| Predicate Device(s): | | |
| | 510(k) Number: | K780045 |
| | Manufacture: | Electro-Cap International, Inc. |
| | Trade Name: | Electro-Gel |
| | 510(k) Number: | K883149 |
| | Manufacture: | Weaver and Company |
| | Trade Name: | TEN20 Conductive Paste |
| | 510(k) Number: | K003924 |
| | Manufacture: | Mavidon |
| | Trade Name: | Mavidon Electrode Jelly |
| | 510(k) Number: | K033052 |
| | Manufacture: | Compumedics USA, Ltd. |
| | Trade Name: | QuikGel |
## 1.0 Description of Device
Electro-Gel is the conductor between the scalp and the (recessed) electrodes. It also reduces impedance (resistance to alternating current) between the electrode surface and the skin. The electrical activity of the brain is transferred to the electrode and then to the EEG or computer equipment. Electro-Gel is for use with external electrodes only.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Electro-Gel is an off white color, water-miscible conductive gel consisting of Sodium Chloride as the conductor combined with thickening agents, emulsifiers, humectants and preservatives all in an aqueous solvent.
The formula is as follows:
Water Aragum T-1998 Methylparaben Glycerin
Potassium Bitartrate Sodium Chloride Propylparaben
The pH range is 4.5 to 6.0 pH, Viscosity range is 575 to 615 cp. and Impedance 0.5K/Ohms or less. Direct contact with the Electro-Gel should not exceed 8 hours in any single recording session. The Electro-Gel is available in the following jar sizes: 16 ounce and 128 ounce. Shelf life is 1 year if stored properly, i.e. kept with containers tightly closed and at room temperature.
## 2.0 Intended Use of Device
This device is intended for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings from humans. The Electro-Gel is used with external electrodes as the conductor between the scalp and the (recessed) electrodes. It also reduces impedance (resistance to alternating current) between the electrode surface and the skin.
## 3.0 Predicate Comparison
The Electro-Gel has the same technological characteristics as the predicate devices. It is the conductor between the scalp and electrodes and reduces impedance between the electrode and the scalp.
(Please refer to the comparison tables on the following four pages).
{2}------------------------------------------------
Table 1 1 compares features and specifications of the current (After July 2008) Electro-Gel under review to the predicates (Prior July 2008) and TEN20 Conductive Paste.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Feature | ELECTRO-GEL<br>After July 2008 | ELECTRO-GEL<br>Prior July 2008 | TEN20 Conductive Paste | Substantial Equivalence Comments |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 510K No. | K111717 | K780045 | K883149 | |
| Indication for Use | Use with external electrodes as the conductor between skin and electrode and to reduce impedance between the electrode surface and the skin | Use with external electrodes as the conductor between skin and electrode and to reduce impedance between the electrode surface and the skin | Use with non-disposable neurodiagnostic electrodes during EEG exams, EP procedures, ENG exams, brainmapping andMSLT procedures | Electro-Gel is used in the same environments and is substantially equivalent to the predicates. |
| Environment of Use | Electrophysiological | Electrophysiological | Electrophysiological | Used in the same clinical environments as predicates. |
| Intended user | Neurologists | Neurologists | Neurologists | Same as predicates |
| Target Patient | Adults and Children | Adults and Children | Adults and Children | Same as predicates |
| Where Used | Topically on intact skin | Topically on intact skin | Topically on intact skin | Same as predicates |
| Conductive material | Salt (NaCl) | Salt (NaCl) | Salt (NaCl) | Same as predicates |
| Thickening agent | Aragum, Glycerine | Tragacanth, Glycerine | Glycerine | Equivalent to predicates |
| Sterilization Method | Provided Non-Sterile | Provided Non Sterile | Provided Non Sterile | Identical sterilization status |
| Chemical Safety | No OSHA PEL* | No OSHA PEL* | No OSHA PEL* | Same as predicates |
| Preservative | Methylparaben and Propylparaben | Methylparaben and Propylparaben | Methylparaben and Propylparaben | Same as predicates |
.. ...
|
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Biocompatibility | Test in accordance with ISO 10993 | | Test in accordance with ISO 10993 | Same as predicates |
|------------------|------------------------------------------|--|------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Cytotoxicity | Yes | | No | Same as predicates |
| Irritation | Yes | | No | Same as predicates |
| Sensitization | Yes | | No | Same as predicates |
| Characteristics | Salt Base<br>Non-irritating<br>Non Toxic | | Salt Base<br>Non-irritating<br>Non Toxic | Equivalent to predicates |
# Comparison Summary 4.1
.
As shown above in Table 4.0, the "July 2008 Electro-Gel brand EEG conductive gel" included in the submission, is identical in all aspects to the predicate "Prior July 2008 Electro-Gel brand EEG conductive gel" except for the thickening agent Aragum, which replaced a like gum, Tragacanth
{4}------------------------------------------------
Table 24. Compares features and specifications of the current (After July 2008) Electro-Gel under review to the predicates Mavidon Electrode Jelly and Compumedics Quik Gel
| | 2: Comparison to Predicate Devices | | | |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | ELECTRO-GEL<br>After July 2008 | MAVIDON ELECTRODE<br>JELLY | QUIK GEL | Substantial<br>Equivalence Comments |
| Feature<br>No. | K111717 | K003924 | K033052 | |
| Indication for Use | Use with external electrodes as the<br>conductor between skin and electrode and<br>to reduce impedance between the<br>electrode surface and the skin | A thixotropic conductive gel for<br>use with silver, gold or tin<br>electrodes. | The Quik Gel is intended for<br>use when a reduction of skin<br>impedance would enhance a<br>test result. It also helps the<br>Quik Cap electrodes adhere to<br>the patient. | Electro-Gel is used in the<br>same environments and<br>is substantially<br>equivalent to the<br>predicates |
| Environment of Use | Electrophysiological | Electrophysiological | Electrophysiological | Used in the same clinical<br>environments. |
| Intended user | Neurologists | Neurologists | Neurologists | Same as predicates |
| Target Patient | Adults and Children | Adults and Children | Adults and Children | Same as predicates |
| Where Used | Topically on intact skin | Topically on intact skin | Topically on intact skin | Same as predicates |
| Conductive material | Salt (NaCl) | Salt (NaCl) | Salt (NaCl) | Same as predicates |
| Thickening agent | Aragum, Glycerine | Hydroxyethyl Cellulose | Glycerine | Equivalent to predicates |
| Sterilization Method | Provided Non-Sterile | Provided Non Sterile | Provided Non-Sterile | Identical sterilization<br>status |
| Chemical Safety | No OSHA PEL | No OSHA PEL | No OSHA PEL | Same as predicates |
| Preservative | Methylparaben and Propylparaben | Phenol | Anti-fungal Agents | Similar to predicates |
------
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Same as predicates<br>ﺮ | ame as predicates | ame as predicates | ame as predicates | ame as predicates | |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--|
| Test in accordance with ISO<br>1 0993 | Y es<br>- | Yes | Yes | Salt Base Non-irritating<br>Non Toxic | |
| Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Non-irritating<br>Non Toxic<br>Salt Base | |
| Test in accordance with ISO 10993 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Salt Base Non-irritating Non-irritating Non-Toxic | |
| iocompatibility | Cytotoxicity<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Irritation | ensitization | naracteristics | |
## Comparison Summary 4.1
identical in all aspects to the predicate "Prior July 2008 Electro-Gel brand EEG conductive gel" except for the thickering agent As shown above in Table 4.0 Add., the "July 2008 Electro-Gel" included in the submission, Aragum, which replaced a like gum, Tragacanth.
{6}------------------------------------------------
## 4.0 Device Testing
The Electro-Gel has been tested by Toxikon Corporation, FDA/USDA Registered, in compliance with 21CFR, Part 58, Good Laboratory Practice for Non-Clinical Laboratory Studies, for the following test: Agar Diffusion Test, ISO 10993-5,-12, Primary Skin Irritation Test-ISO Direct Contact, ISO 10993-10,- 12 and Buehler Sensitization Test, ISO 10993-10, - 12. The Electro-Gel passed all tests.
Electro-Gel is tested internally for pH, impedance and viscosity on a regular basis.
### 4.0 Conclusions
- Based on the results of the non-clinical tests (that demonstrate that the device is as safe, as effective and performs as well as the other legal marketed devices) we conclude that the intended use and technology of the Electro-Gel is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. No new questions of safety or effectiveness are raised.
{7}------------------------------------------------
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter of the circle. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of an eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
JAN - 5 2012
Electro-Cap International, Inc. c/o Ms. Amy Swallows Director of Marketing 1011 West Lexington Road Eaton, OH 45320
Re: K111717
Trade/Device Name: Electro-Gel Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1275 Regulation Name: Electroconductive Media Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GYB Dated: December 19, 2011 Received: December 20, 2011
Dear Ms. Swallows:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
{8}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Amy Swallows
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Ettan m for
Malvina B. Eydelman, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic, Neurological, and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{9}------------------------------------------------
## Attachment B
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K 11 | 719
Device Name: Electro-Gel
Indications for Use:
Electro-Gel is intended for use in clinical and research EEG/EP recordings from humans. It is used with external electrodes as the conductor between the scalp and the (recessed) electrodes. It also reduces impedance (resistance to alternating current) between the electrode surface and the skin.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
John Grimes
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Ophthalmic, Neurological and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices
510(k) Number K111717
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.