K111283 · Medacta International · JWH · May 27, 2011 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K111283
Device Name
GMK REVISION HYBRID LINERS
Applicant
Medacta International
Product Code
JWH · Orthopedic
Decision Date
May 27, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Evolis®/GMK® knee prosthesis is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty, if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components. This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases: • Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis. - Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle. - Post traumatic loss of joint configuration. - Primary implantation failure. Tibial augments are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement. In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the tibial and on the femoral components.
Device Story
GMK Revision Hybrid Liners are orthopedic tibial inserts for total knee arthroplasty; line extension to GMK Total Knee System. Device components: Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners; available in Ultracongruent (UC) and Posterior Stabilized (PS) configurations; six sizes; 10-20mm thicknesses. Operation: Liners attach to GMK tibial baseplates via fixing screw; articulate with Evolis femoral components. Used in revision surgery to replace Evolis tibial baseplates while retaining existing Evolis femoral components; also applicable for primary surgery coupling GMK baseplates with Evolis femoral components. Surgeon-operated in clinical/OR setting. Benefits: Provides surgical flexibility to mix-and-match components during revision or primary procedures; restores joint function; alleviates pain from arthritis or implant failure.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data presented. Testing included range of motion, mobility of articulating surfaces, comparative wear behavior, and clipping system endurance. All tests met pre-defined acceptance criteria based on engineering analysis and comparison to predicate systems.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE). Design: Fixed-bearing tibial inserts (UC and PS). Dimensions: Sizes 1-6, thicknesses 10-20mm. Connectivity: None (mechanical implant). Sterilization: Not specified. Software: None.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring total knee arthroplasty due to severely painful/disabled joints from arthritis (traumatic, rheumatoid, polyarthritis), avascular necrosis of the femoral condyle, post-traumatic joint loss, or primary implantation failure. Requires sufficient sound bone for component seating. Contraindicated if insufficient bone stock exists.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
K III 283 (1/3)
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Medacta International. The logo consists of two black triangles, the word "Medacta" in black letters, a horizontal line underneath the word, and the word "International" in smaller black letters below the line. To the right of the word "International" is a symbol that looks like a plus sign.
MAY 2 7 2011
#### 510(k) Summary
Manufacturer: Medacta International SA Strada Regina 6874 Castel San Pietro (CH) Switzerland Phone (+41) 91 696 60 60 FAX (+41) 91 696 60 66
- Contact Person: Mr. Adam Gross RA/QA Medacta USA 4725 Calle Quetzal, Unit B Camarillo, CA, 93012 Phone: (805)437-7085 Fax: (805)437-7089 Email: AGross@medacta.us.com
Date Prepared: May 6, 2011
#### DEVICE INFORMATION
Trade/Proprietary Name: GMK® Total Knee System - GMK Revision Hybrid Liners Common Name: Total Knee Prosthesis - Tibial Inserts Classification Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial metal/polymer/metal semiconstrained cemented prosthesis
Classification: Class II, 21 CFR 888.3560 Product Code: JWH Predicate Device: K090988 GMK® Total Knee System (Medacta International), cleared July 10, 2009
{1}------------------------------------------------
# IIIZ83 (213)
#### Product Description
This modification to the original Medacta GMK® (Global Medacta Knee) Total Knee System is a line extension to include the GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners. The GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners work with tibial baseplates from the GMK® Total Knee System, femoral components from the Evolis Total Knee System, and an extension stem, offset connector, and tibial wedges from the GMK® Total Knee System -Revision, which are optional for patient specific cases. The GMK Revision Hybrid Liners provide the surgeon with an additional option. The GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners are offered as both Ultracongruent (UC) Fixed and Posterior Stabilized (PS) Fixed in six sizes with five thicknesses from 10 mm to 20 mm. The GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners are attached to the GMK® tibial baseplates of the same size from the GMK® Total Knee System and articulate with the existing Evolis femoral component. The device is used primarily during an Evolis Revision surgery where the Evolis tibial baseplate is revised with a GMK tibial baseplate and the existing Evolis femoral component stays intact. The GMK Revision Hybrid Liners can also be used if a surgeon desires to couple a GMK tibial baseplate with an Evolis femoral component during a primary surgery. GMK Revision ultracongruent hybrid liners can be used only with standard Evolis femoral components and fixed GMK tibial baseplates. GMK Revision posterior-stabilized hybrid liners can be used only with posterior-stabilized Evolis femoral components and fixed GMK tibial baseplates.
#### Indications for Use
The Evolis®/GMK® knee prosthesis is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty, if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components.
This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:
• Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis.
- Avascular necrosis of femoral condyle.
- · Post traumatic loss of joint configuration.
· Primary implantation failure.
Tibial augments are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement.
In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the tibial and on the femoral components.
#### Comparison to Predicate Devices
The GMK® Total Knee System was cleared under K090988. GMK® Revision components, as a line extension, was cleared under a Special 510(k), K102437. Evolis Total Knee System was cleared under K081023 and was the main predicate for the
GMK Revision Hybrid Liners 510(k) May 27, 2011
Section 5 - Page 3 of 4
{2}------------------------------------------------
GMK Total Knee System. The subject of this submission is the GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners, an additional line extension of the GMK Total Knee System.
The indications for use for the modified system remain the same as the GMK Revision 510(k), K102437.
The GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners are made of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE), the same material and processing, as is used in the GMK® Total Knee System's standard, ultracongruent (UC), and posteriorstabilized (PS) tibial inserts and patellas. Like the GMK® Total Knee System's PS tibial inserts, the GMK® Hybrid PS Liners are attached to the GMK® fixed bearing tibial baseplates, cleared in the original GMK® Total Knee System. They are attached with a fixing screw, which is identical to the GMK® PS tibial inserts.
The GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners are offered in thicknesses from 10 to 20mm and in sizes 1 - 6, the same as all of the GMK® Total Knee System components. The GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners only work with the same size GMK® tibial baseplate, similar to how the previously cleared tibial inserts work. The GMK Revision Hybrid Liners may be used with either a left or right GMK® tibial baseplate in the same manner as the previously cleared tibial inserts. The GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners, when attached to the GMK® tibial baseplates, allow the use of extension stems, offset connectors, and tibial wedges as optional augments, identical to the other previously cleared tibial inserts. On the femoral side, the GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners only work with the same size Evolis femoral component. GMK Revision ultracongruent hybrid liners can be used only with standard Evolis femoral components and fixed GMK tibial baseplates. GMK Revision posterior-stabilized hybrid liners can be used only with posterior-stabilized Evolis femoral components and fixed GMK tibial baseplates.
### Performance Testing
No performance standards applicable to this device have been adopted under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
The modification to the GMK® Total Knee system to include the addition of the GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners was evaluated by risk analysis to identify any new risks associated with the change. Based on the risk analysis, design verification was conducted to written protocols with pre-defined acceptance criteria. The protocols and pre-defined acceptance criteria were based on the standards, FDA guidance, and comparison to the predicate device systems. The testing was conducted on the worst case component size and option/design based on engineering analysis. The performance testing conducted on the GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners was very similar to the protocols conducted for the predicate device, the GMK® Total Knee System. The testing included range of motion and mobility of the articulating surfaces, comparative wear behavior, and a measure of the clipping system endurance. The testing met all acceptance criteria and verifies that the performance of the GMK® Revision Hybrid Liners is substantially equivalent to the predicate device systems.
### Conclusion:
Based on the above information, the GMK Revision Hybrid Liners can be considered as substantially equivalent to its predicate devices.
GMK Revision Hybrid Liners 510(k) May 27, 2011
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The seal features a stylized eagle with its wings spread, symbolizing protection and service. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle. The seal is presented in black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Medacta International SA % Medacta USA Mr. Adam Gross RA/QA 4725 Calle Quetzal, Unit B Camarillo, California 93012
MAY 2 7 2011
Re: K111283
Trade/Device Name: GMK® Total Knee System - GMK Revision Hybrid Liners Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3560 Regulation Name: Knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JWH Dated: May 6, 2011 Received: May 6, 2011
Dear Mr. Gross:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{4}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Mr. Adam Gross
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutiFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Ervin L. Keith
Jur Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K111283
Device Name: GMK® Total Knee System - GMK Revision Hybrid Liners
Indications for Use:
The Evolis®/GMK® knee prosthesis is designed for cemented use in total knee arthroplasty, if there is evidence of sufficient sound bone to seat and support the components.
This knee replacement system is indicated in the following cases:
• Severely painful and/or disabled joint as a result of arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyarthritis.
- · Avascular necrosis of femoral condvle.
- Post traumatic loss of joint configuration.
- · Primary implantation failure.
Tibial augments are to be attached to the tibial baseplate with both the fixing cylinders and bone cement.
In case a semi-constrained liner is used, an extension stem must be implanted both on the tibial and on the femoral components.
Prescription Use × (21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
| (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
E. Kitt
Sign-Oil) Division Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
GMK Revision Hybrid Liners 510(k) 510(k) Number - 111283 May 27, 2011
Section 4 - Page 2 of 2
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.