ABX PENTRA ENZYMATIC CREATININE CP, ABX PENTRA MULTICAL, ABX PENTRA N CONTROL, ABX PENTRA P CONTROL, AND ABX PENTRA URIN
K110137 · HORIBA ABX SAS · JFY · Aug 10, 2011 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K110137
Device Name
ABX PENTRA ENZYMATIC CREATININE CP, ABX PENTRA MULTICAL, ABX PENTRA N CONTROL, ABX PENTRA P CONTROL, AND ABX PENTRA URIN
Applicant
HORIBA ABX SAS
Product Code
JFY · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Aug 10, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Abbreviated
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1225
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
ABX PENTRA Enzymatic Creatinine CP reagent, with associated calibrator and controls, is a diagnostic reagent for quantitative in vitro determination of Creatinine in human serum, plasma and urine based on an enzymatic method using a multi-step approach ending with a photometric end-point reaction. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes. The ABX PENTRA Multical is a calibrator for use in the calibration of quantitative Horiba Medical methods on Horiba Medical clinical chemistry analyzers. The ABX PENTRA N Control is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision. The ABX PENTRA P Control is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision. The ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision.
Device Story
Assay uses enzymatic colorimetric method to measure creatinine in human serum, plasma, and urine; requires ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer. Process: creatinine converted to creatine via creatinine amidohydrolase; creatine broken down to sarcosine and urea; subsequent enzyme-linked steps with sarcosine oxidase and peroxidase produce colored chromogen measured at 545nm. System includes bi-reagent cassette, lyophilized human serum calibrator, and quality controls. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Output: quantitative creatinine concentration (mg/dL). Results assist clinicians in diagnosing/treating renal disease and monitoring dialysis. Benefits: provides standardized, automated measurement of renal function markers.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (N=20/run, 80 total); serum CV% 0.29-4.12%, urine CV% 0.83-2.21%. Linearity per CLSI EP6-A; reportable range 0.11-16.95 mg/dL (serum), 3.56-175 mg/dL (urine). LoD/LoQ per CLSI EP17-A. Method comparison (N=153 serum, N=106 urine) against predicate showed high correlation (Slope 1.00/0.96, R2 0.999/0.997). Matrix comparison (N=40) confirmed no significant effect between serum, Li-Heparin, and EDTA plasma.
Technological Characteristics
Enzymatic photometric assay. Reagents: bi-reagent cassette. Calibrators/Controls: lyophilized human serum or liquid urine with chemical additives. Connectivity: designed for ABX PENTRA 400 analyzer. Stability: Reagent 18 months closed/30 days on-board; Calibrator/Control stability varies by analyte and storage condition.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative in vitro determination of creatinine in human serum, plasma, and urine to aid in diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for other urine analytes. Intended for prescription use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A creatinine test system is a device intended to measure creatinine levels in plasma and urine. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes.
ABX PENTRA Multical; ABX PENTRA Control N and P; ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H (k072115)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k110137
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Creatinine
D. Type of Test:
Enzymatic colorimetric, quantitative
E. Applicant:
Horiba ABX SAS
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
1. ABX PENTRA Enzymatic Creatinine CP
2. ABX PENTRA Multical
3. ABX PENTRA N Control
4. ABX PENTRA P Control
5. ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JFY | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1225
Creatinine Test System | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JIX | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1150
Calibrator | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
| JJY | Class I, reserved | 21 CFR 862.1660
Quality Control Material | Clinical Chemistry (75) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
{1}
Refer to indication for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
ABX PENTRA Enzymatic Creatinine CP reagent, with associated calibrator and controls, is a diagnostic reagent for quantitative in vitro determination of Creatinine in human serum, plasma and urine based on an enzymatic method using a multi-step approach ending with a photometric end-point reaction. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes.
The ABX PENTRA Multical is a calibrator for use in the calibration of quantitative Horiba Medical methods on Horiba Medical clinical chemistry analyzers.
The ABX PENTRA N Control is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision.
The ABX PENTRA P Control is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision.
The ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For in vitro diagnostic use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The ABX PENTRA Enzymatic Creatinine CP is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative in vitro determination of creatinine in human serum, plasma and urine based on an enzymatic method using a multi-step approach ending with a photometric end-point reaction. It is composed of a bi-reagent cassette (R1= 22 mL; R2= 8 mL). Reagent is a chemical solution with additives.
The ABX PENTRA Multical is a lyophilized human serum calibrator with chemical additives and materials of biological origin. The assigned values of the calibrator's components are given in the labeling, ensuring optimal calibration of the appropriate HORIBA ABX SAS methods on the ABX PENTRA 400 analyzer. This calibrator is provided in ten vials of 3 ml.
The ABX PENTRA N Control and ABX PENTRA P Control are quality control
{2}
products consisting of lyophilized human serum with chemical additives and materials of biological origin added as required to obtain given component levels. The assigned values of the control components are given in the labeling, ensuring control of the appropriate HORIBA ABX SAS methods on the ABX PENTRA 400 analyzer. Each control is provided in ten vials of 5 ml.
The sponsor stated in the labeling that all donor units of serum used in the preparation of Calibrators and Controls were tested by FDA-approved method and found negative for HIV (HIV I/II antibody), HBV (HBsAg) and HCV (antibody).
The ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H is a two-level (Low and High) quality control consisting of liquid solutions prepared from human urine with chemical additives and materials of biological origin added as required to obtain given component levels. The assigned values of the control components are given in the labeling, ensuring control of the appropriate HORIBA ABX SAS methods on the ABX PENTRA 400 analyzer. Each control level is provided in one vial of 10 ml.
The sponsor stated in the labeling that the serum from each donor contributing urine for this product was tested by FDA accepted methods and found non-reactive for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), antibody to Hepatitis C (HCV) and antibody to HIV-1/HIV-2.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Diagnostic Chemicals Limited Enzymatic Creatinine Assay
ABX PENTRA Multical; ABX PENTRA Control N and P; ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H (k072115)
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k070383, k072115
3. Comparison with predicate:
{3}
| Items | ABX PENTRA Enzymatic Creatinine CP (Candidate Device) | Diagnostic Chemicals Limited Enzymatic Creatinine Assay (Predicate Device) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Similarity | | |
| Intended use/Indication for use | Same | Intended for the quantitative determination of creatinine in serum, plasma and urine. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes. |
| Test method | Same | Enzymatic colorimetric, quantitative |
| Sample type | Same | Serum, plasma, urine |
| Difference | | |
| Measuring range | Serum/plasma 0.11– 16.95 mg/dL Urine 3.56– 175 mg/dL | Serum/plasma 0.04-30 mg/dL Urine 0.03-175 mg/dL |
| Items | ABX PENTRA Multical (Candidate Device) | ABX PENTRA Multical (k072115) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended use/Indication for use | Same | For use in the calibration of quantitative Horiba Medical methods on Horiba Medical clinical chemistry analyzers. |
| Matrix | Same | Lyophilized human serum with chemical additives |
| Number of Analytes | 26 (addition of Creatinine) | 25 |
| Items | ABX PENTRA Control N and P (Candidate Device) | ABX PENTRA Control N and P (k072115) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended use/Indication for use | Same | For use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision. |
| Matrix | Same | Lyophilized human serum with chemical additives |
| Number of Analytes | 26 (addition of Creatinine) | 25 |
| Items | ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H (Candidate Device) | ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H (k072115) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended use/Indication for use | Same | For use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision. |
| Matrix | Same | Human urine with chemical additives |
| Number of analytes | 10 (addition of Creatinine) | 9 |
{4}
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI Guideline EP5-A2
CLSI Guideline EP6-A
CLSI Guideline EP9-A2
CLSI Guideline EP17-A
# L. Test Principle:
This enzymatic method for creatinine utilizes a multi-step approach ending with a photometric end-point reaction. The enzyme creatinine amidohydrolase is used to convert creatinine to creatine. Creatine is broken down to sarcosine and urea by creatine amidinohydrolase. Further enzyme linked steps with sarcosine oxidase and peroxidase yield a colored chromogen read at $545\mathrm{nm}$ .
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
# Study Protocol:
Within run precision was established by assaying two levels of control and patient samples 20 times in a single run. Total precision was established by assaying the same set of samples in duplicate twice a day for 20 days. The results are summarized below.
# Result Summary:
Within-run precision
| Matrix | Sample | N | Mean (mg/dL) | CV% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Serum | Control 1 | 20 | 0.90 | 2.18 |
| | Control 2 | 20 | 4.05 | 0.54 |
| | Patient 1 | 20 | 0.56 | 2.86 |
| | Patient 2 | 20 | 1.52 | 1.08 |
| | Patient 3 | 20 | 6.46 | 0.29 |
| Urine | Control 1 | 20 | 66.52 | 0.83 |
| | Control 2 | 20 | 148.78 | 0.87 |
| | Patient 1 | 20 | 10.91 | 2.21 |
| | Patient 2 | 20 | 89.26 | 0.83 |
Total precision
| Matrix | Sample | N | Mean (mg/dL) | CV% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Serum | Control 1 | 80 | 1.29 | 2.23 |
| | Control 2 | 80 | 5.20 | 2.24 |
| | Patient 1 | 80 | 0.57 | 4.12 |
| | Patient 2 | 80 | 1.51 | 2.07 |
{5}
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
# Study Protocol:
Linearity was evaluated following CLSI guideline EP6-A. For serum linearity, a spiked serum sample was used as the high sample and a diluted serum sample (2x in $0.9\%$ NaCl) was used as the low sample. The intermediate concentrations in creatinine were prepared by serial dilution of the highest sample using the low sample as the diluents. For urine linearity, a spiked urine sample was used as the high sample and $0.9\%$ NaCl was used as the low sample. For both studies, the mean of 4 replicate measurements were used in the regression analysis.
# Summary:
Based on results of the linearity study and the limit of detection study (see below in $d$ ), the sponsor claimed that the reportable range for the serum assay is $0.11 - 16.95 \, \mathrm{mg/dL}$ , the reportable range for urine assay is $3.55 - 175 \, \mathrm{mg/dL}$ . The sponsor has also provided data to support that automatic dilution can go up to $50.85 \, \mathrm{mg/dL}$ for serum and $846.9 \, \mathrm{mg/dL}$ for urine.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
# Traceability:
The ABX PENTRA enzymatic creatinine assay, calibrators, and controls are traceable to NIST reference material SRM909b.
# Stability:
Real-time testing was conducted. The stability study protocol and the acceptance criteria have been reviewed and found to be acceptable. The study results support the following stability claims in the labeling:
Closed-Vial and Open-Vial Stability
| Item | Storage Conditions | | Claimed Stability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reagent Packs | Close-Vial | 2-8°C | 18 months |
| | Open-Vial | On system, 2-8°C | 30 days |
| Calibrators | Close-Vial | 2-8°C | 24 months |
| | Open-Vial | -25 °C to -15°C | 2 weeks |
| | | 2-8°C | 2 days |
| | | 15°C to 25°C | 8 hours |
| Serum controls | Close-Vial | 2-8°C | 30 months |
| | Open-Vial | -25 °C to -15°C | 1 month |
| | | 2-8°C | 5 days |
| | | 15°C to 25°C | 12 hours |
{6}
7
| Urine Controls | Close-Vial | 2-8°C | 2 years |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Open-Vial | 2-8°C | 30 days |
## Calibration Interval:
Stability across a 14 day calibration interval was assessed by calculating the percentage bias of 2 control specimens on each day from the result obtained on day 0. The results support the product claim of a 14-day calibration interval. The sponsor also noted in the labeling that a recalibration is recommended when reagent lots change, and when quality control results fall outside the range established.
## Value Assignment:
- Calibrators: The target value is determined by the median of 150 results from 6 ABX PENTRA 400 analyzers. The median is acceptable when percentage deviation is less than 10%.
- Controls: The target value is determined by the median of 150 results from 6 ABX PENTRA 400 analyzers. The median is acceptable when percentage deviation is less than 10%. The lot specific range was assigned as mean ± 3 SD. If 3 SD > 20% compared to the target value, the acceptable percentage will be of 20%, if 3SD < 10% compared to the target values, the acceptable percentage will be 10%.
## d. Detection limit:
### Study Protocol:
Limit of Blank (LoB) and Limit of Detection (LoD) were determined following CLSI guideline EP17-A. For LoB determination, 0.9% NaCl was used as the Zero sample and assayed 90 times on 3 different Pentra 400 instruments. For LoD determination, 4 altered serum or urine samples with creatinine concentrations between LoB and 4xLoB were assayed 20 times for each sample.
For LoQ determination, a range of low concentration samples were prepared by 10% serial dilution and were assayed 10 times for each sample. The CV% and the bias at each tested concentration were calculated. LoQ is defined as the lowest concentration that meets CV% < 15% and the relative bias is in the +/-10% range.
## Summary:
Based on the limit of quantitation determined in this study (see result in the below table) and the result from the linearity study in M1 b, the sponsor claimed a detection limit of 3.56 mg/dL in the labeling.
| | LoB | LoD | LoQ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Serum | 0.011 mg/dl | 0.026 mg/dl | 0.11 mg/dl |
| Urine | 0.011 mg/dl | 0.66 mg/dl | 1.71 mg/dl |
{7}
8
e. Analytical specificity:
- Interference
**Study Protocol:**
The sponsor evaluated the effect of the interfering substances following the Valtec guideline (Vassault et al., Ann. Biol. Clin., 1986, (44), 686-745).
Pooled serum/urine samples with low and high levels of creatinine (approximately 1.5 mg/dL, 6.5 mg/dL in the serum pools, and 11 mg/dL and 88 mg/dL in the urine pools) were used as the base samples. Each interfering substance was added to the base samples and tested at 4 different concentrations.
**Result Summary:**
Based on the sponsor-defined limit of ± 5% bias between sample with and without interfering substances, the following claims were made:
**Serum assay:**
The below compounds at the indicated concentration do not cause significant interference with the serum assay.
| Compound | Concentration up to |
| --- | --- |
| Haemoglobin | 500 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 612.5 mg/dL |
| Total Bilirubin | 27.4 mg/dL |
| Direct Bilirubin | 9.9 mg/dL |
**Urine assay:**
The below compounds at the indicated concentration do not cause significant interference with the serum assay.
| Compound | Concentration up to |
| --- | --- |
| Haemoglobin | 390 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 612.5 mg/dL |
| Direct Bilirubin | 13.4 mg/dL |
| Ascorbic Acid | 5.98 mg/dL |
**The sponsor also referenced Young’s effect for list of drugs and preanalytical variables known to affect this methodology.**
Young DS. Effects of Drugs on Clinical Laboratory Tests. 4th Edition, Washington, DC, AACC Press (1997) 3: 143-163.
Young DS. Effects of Preanalytical Variables on Clinical Laboratory Tests. 2nd Edition, Washington, DC, AACC Press (1997) 3: 120-132.
{8}
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
# Study Protocol:
Unaltered patient samples (Serum N=153, Urine N=106) were used in the comparison studies. Each sample was assayed in singlet using the proposed assay on ABX PENTRA 400 and the predicate method on Olympus AU400 analyzer.
# Result Summary:
The result of Linear Regression analysis is summarized in the below Table.
| | N | Claimed measuring range (mg/dL) | Range of samples (mg/dL) | Slope | Intercept | R2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Serum | 153 | 0.11-16.95 | 0.35-16.15 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.999 |
| Urine | 106 | 3.56-175 | 6.61-171.28 | 0.96 | 0.40 | 0.997 |
# Conclusion:
Based on the regression analysis result, the sponsor claimed equivalency to the predicate assay.
# b. Matrix comparison:
Matched sets of serum, Li-Heparin plasma, and EDTA plasma were obtained from 40 patients. The reported values for each sample and for each matrix were obtained from single measurements (one replicate). Results of linear regression are summarized in the below table.
| Matrix Y | Matrix X | Slope | Intercept | R2 | N | Sample Range (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium heparin plasma | Serum | 0.9963 | 0.0515 | 1.000 | 40 | 0.40-15.42 |
| K3-EDTA plasma | Serum | 1.0177 | 0.0427 | 1.000 | 40 | |
# Conclusion:
Based on the regression result, the sponsor concluded that there is no significant matrix effect between serum, Li-Heparin plasma, and EDTA plasma specimens.
# 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
{9}
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
None
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor stated in the labeling that each laboratory should establish its own reference ranges and the values given in the insert are used as guidelines only.
Serum/Plasma:
Men: 0.62 - 1.10 mg/dL
Women: 0.45 - 0.75 mg/dL
Urine (24 hours):
Men: 14 - 26 mg/kg/day
Women: 11 - 20 mg/kg/day
Reference:
Reference Information for the Clinical Laboratory, TIETZ Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 4th Ed; Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, (Elsevier Saunders eds. St Louis, USA), (2006):2264.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.