K103618 · Ev3, Inc. · MCW · Jan 5, 2011 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K103618
Device Name
TURBOHAWK PEROPHERAL PLAQUE EXCISION SYSTEM
Applicant
Ev3, Inc.
Product Code
MCW · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Jan 5, 2011
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.4875
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, 3rd-Party Reviewed
Indications for Use
The TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System is intended for use in atherectomy of the peripheral vasculature. The TurboHawk Catheter is NOT intended for use in the coronary, carotid, iliac, or renal vasculature.
Device Story
TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System is a catheter-based device for peripheral artery atherectomy. System comprises a flexible catheter tracking over a 0.014" guidewire and a handheld, battery-driven ev3 Cutter Driver. Distal end features a rotating inner cutter within a tubular housing. Physician operates device by engaging cutter via thumb switch and advancing catheter across lesion; rotating cutter shaves occlusive material, which is captured and stored in the device tip. Process is repeated to achieve desired plaque excision. Used in clinical settings for treatment of atherosclerotic lesions. Output is physical removal of plaque, allowing physician to restore vessel patency. Benefits include reduction of arterial blockage.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence demonstrated via bench testing only. In vitro tests included effective length, guidewire loading, cutter height, cycle/life, torque/tensile strength of joints, trackability, cut depth, cut mass per pass, and tissue removal cycles. Testing leveraged from predicate K093301 for spin percentage, biocompatibility, packaging, and sterilization.
Technological Characteristics
Catheter-based atherectomy system. Flexible shaft tracks over 0.014" guidewire. Distal assembly features rotating inner cutter in tubular housing. Powered by handheld, battery-driven cutter driver. Mechanical cutting principle. No software or electronic algorithms described.
Indications for Use
Indicated for atherectomy of peripheral vasculature to treat de novo and restenotic calcified and non-calcified atherosclerotic lesions. Contraindicated for use in coronary, carotid, iliac, or renal vasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intraluminal artery stripper is a device used to perform an endarterectomy (removal of plaque deposits from arterisclerotic arteries.)
Predicate Devices
TurboHawk™ Peripheral Plaque Excision System (K093301)
SilverHawk™ Peripheral Plaque Excision System (K061188)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for EV3, which is a robotics platform developed by LEGO. The logo consists of the letters "ev3" in a bold, sans-serif font, with a small cluster of three circles above the letters. The circles are arranged in a triangular shape, with two circles on top and one circle below, creating a visual element that is simple and recognizable.
Your endovascular company."
# JAN - 5 2011
K1036/8
### 510(k) Summary
## TurboHawk™ Peripheral Plaque Excision System
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 C.F.R § 807.92.
#### 1. Submitter Information
| Applicant | ev3 Inc.<br>3033 Campus Drive<br>Plymouth, MN 55441-2651<br>Tel: 763-398-7000<br>Fax: 763-591-3248 |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Person | Brenda Johnson<br>Principal Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Date Prepared | December 3, 2010 |
| 2. Subject Device | |
| Device Trade Name | TurboHawk™ Peripheral Plaque Excision System |
| Device Common Name | Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy |
| Classification Name | Intraluminal Artery Stripper<br>21 CFR 870.4875, Product Code MCW |
| Classification Panel | Cardiovascular |
| 3. Predicate Devices | |
| Device Trade Name | TurboHawk™ Peripheral Plaque Excision System;<br>SilverHawk™ Peripheral Plaque Excision System |
| 510(k) Number | K093301; K061188 |
| 510(k) Clearance Date | November 6, 2009; October 23, 2006 |
#### 4. Device Description
The TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System (TurboHawk Catheter and ev3 Cutter Driver) is designed for the treatment of de novo and restenotic calcified and non-calcified atherosclerotic lesions located in native peripheral arteries. The TurboHawk Catheter consists of a flexible shaft designed to track over a 0.014" guidewire. At the distal end of the TurboHawk Catheter is a small cutting assembly comprised of a rotating inner cutter contained within a
{1}------------------------------------------------
tubular housing. The proximal end of the TurboHawk Catheter contains a connector and cutter positioning lever (thumb switch) designed to fit into the ev3 Cutter Driver. The ev3 Cutter Driver is a handheld, disposable, battery-driven unit (Catalog No: 02550) which powers the system.
The TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System has two switches: 1) the SilverHawk Cutter Driver main power switch and 2) the TurboHawk Catheter thumb switch. The ev3 Cutter Driver main power switch supplies power to the device when turned ON. The TurboHawk Catheter thumb switch activates the drive shaft and engages the cutter when pulled proximally to the ON position. With the cutter engaged, the TurboHawk Catheter is slowly advanced across the lesion, shaving occlusive material from the artery. The excised tissue is captured and stored in the tip of the device. The cutting process is completed by advancing the TurboHawk Catheter thumb switch distally deactivating the drive shaft and disengaging the cutter. The TurboHawk Catheter thumb switch is fully advanced distally to the OFF position in order to pack the excised plaque into the tip. This cutting sequence is repeated as necessary to achieve the desired degree of plaque excision.
#### 5. Indications for Use
The TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System is intended for use in atherectomy of the peripheral vasculature. The TurboHawk Catheter is NOT intended for use in the coronary, carotid, iliac, or renal vasculature.
#### 6. Comparison of Technological Characteristics
The TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System has the following similarities to the predicate device:
- . Identical indications for use
- . Identical intended use as the predicate TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System
- . Similar fundamental scientific technology
- . Similar operating principle
- Similar materials .
#### 7. Performance Testing Summary
To demonstrate substantial equivalence of the subject device, the TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System to the predicate device, the technological characteristics and performance criteria were evaluated. Using FDA Guidance Documents on non-clinical testing of medical devices and internal Risk Analysis procedures, the following in vitro tests were performed:
- Effective length .
- Guidewire loading ●
- Cutter height ●
- Cycle and life
- Carbide edge attachment
- Proximal drive shaft joint torque test ●
- � Distal drive shaft assembly torque test
- Distal drive shaft assembly tensile test �
- � Tip, hinge, and distal torque shaft joints tensile test
- Cutter stop tensile .
- Trackability .
- Cut depth ●
{2}------------------------------------------------
- . Cut mass per pass
- . Guidewire lumen zip
- . Embolization
- . Tissue removal cycles
Testing leveraged from the predicate TurboHawk Device included spin percentage, biocompatibility, packaging and sterilization. Test results met the specified acceptance criteria and were included in K093301.
The results from these tests demonstrate that the technological characteristics and performance criteria of the TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System are comparable to the predicate device and that the TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System performs in a manner equivalent to the predicate device currently on the market for the same intended use.
#### 8. Conclusions
Based on the intended use, technological characteristics, safety and performance testing included in this submission, ev3 considers the TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System to be substantially equivalent to the predicate TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System (K093301) and the predicate SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System (K061188).
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol resembling an eagle or bird in flight, composed of three curved lines representing the wings and a wavy line representing the body.
Food and Drug Administration 1 0903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
ev3, Inc. c/o Mr. Mark Job Reviewer Regulatory Technology Services, LLC 1394 25th Street NW Buffalo, MN 55313
Re: K103618
Trade/Device Name: TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.4875 Regulation Name: Intraluminal artery stripper Regulatory Class: Class II (two) Product Code: MCW Dated: December 9, 2010 Received: December 10, 2010
#### Dear Mr. Job:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Or to and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
JAN - 5 2011
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register ning your device in the Federal Icegister. The first for
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Mark Job
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Duna R. Palmer
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
JAN - 5 2011
Page 1 of 1
### Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number (if known): K103618
Device Name: TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System Indications for Use:
The TurboHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System is intended for use in atherectomy of the peripheral vasculature. The TurboHawk Catheter is NOT intended for use in the coronary, carotid, iliac, or renal vasculature.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Duma R. Lumer
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Cardiovascular Devices
510(k) Number K103618
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.