K101851 · Davol Inc., Sub. C. R. Bard, Inc. · FTL · Jul 15, 2010 · General, Plastic Surgery
Device Facts
Record ID
K101851
Device Name
VENTRALIGHT ST MESH
Applicant
Davol Inc., Sub. C. R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
FTL · General, Plastic Surgery
Decision Date
Jul 15, 2010
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 878.3300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Ventralight ST Mesh is intended for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue deficiencies, such as for the repair of hernias.
Device Story
Ventralight ST Mesh is a sterile, single-use surgical mesh for soft tissue reconstruction and hernia repair. Device consists of a co-knitted polypropylene (PP) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) fiber layer, coated on the visceral side with a bioresorbable hydrogel (sodium hyaluronate, carboxymethylcellulose, and polyethylene glycol). The PP side facilitates fibroblastic tissue ingrowth; the bioresorbable coating minimizes visceral tissue attachment and is resorbed within 30 days. This 'low profile' version of the predicate Sepramesh IP Mesh uses lighter-weight PP monofilament and modified PGA layering to allow deployment through smaller trocars during laparoscopic procedures. Surgeons place the mesh to bridge or reinforce soft tissue defects; the device provides structural support while the coating prevents adhesions during the initial healing phase.
Clinical Evidence
No human clinical trials were conducted. Evidence consists of bench testing (pullout, burst, tear, suture retention, dry bond, and hydrogel disruption strength) and a 4-week post-implantation porcine study comparing the subject device to the predicate. The animal study evaluated tissue attachment, mesh contracture, tissue ingrowth, and inflammatory/fibrotic response. Results demonstrated the device meets specifications and performs equivalently to the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Co-knitted polypropylene (PP) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers. Visceral side coated with bioresorbable hydrogel (sodium hyaluronate, carboxymethylcellulose, polyethylene glycol). Low-profile design; lighter-weight PP monofilament compared to predicate. Sterile, single-use, implantable mesh.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the reconstruction of soft tissue deficiencies, including hernia repair, in patients requiring surgical mesh.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh is a metallic or polymeric screen intended to be implanted to reinforce soft tissue or bone where weakness exists. Examples of surgical mesh are metallic and polymeric mesh for hernia repair, and acetabular and cement restrictor mesh used during orthopedic surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
# 8. 510(k) Summary
#### 510(k) SUMMARY
# KIO1851
This 510(k) Summary is provided per the requirements of section 807.92(c).
| 510(k) Number: | TBD | JUL 15 2010 | |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|--|
| Owner Name: | Davol Inc., Subsidiary of C. R. Bard, Inc. | | |
| Address: | 100 Crossings Boulevard<br>Warwick, RI 02886 | | |
| Contact Person: | Michelle Godin<br>Sr. Regulatory Affairs Associate<br>Tel: 401-825-8589<br>Fax: 401-825-8765<br>Email address: michelle.godin@crbard.com | | |
| Alternate Contact: | Thomas Hutchinson<br>Vice President, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs<br>Tel: 401-825-8409<br>Fax: 401-825-8765<br>Email address: tom.hutchinson@crbard.com | | |
| Date Prepared: | June 30, 2010 | | |
| Device Trade Name: | Ventralight ST Mesh | | |
| Device Common Name: | Surgical Mesh | | |
| Class: | Class II, 21 CFR 878.3300, Product Code FTL | | |
#### Predicate Device(s):
- Sepramesh IP Bioresorbable Coating/Permanent Mesh (K040868, K053066, . K063739)
### Device Description:
The Ventralight ST Mesh is a low profile, sterile, single use device indicated for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue deficiencies, such as for the repair of hernias. This device is co-knitted using polypropylene (PP) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers to
> Special 510(k) Submission for the Bard Ventralight ST Mesh
{1}------------------------------------------------
result in a two-sided mesh with a PP surface and a PGA surface. The mesh is coated on the PGA surface with a bioresorbable, chemically modified sodium hyaluronate (HA), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) based hydrogel. The fascial side of the mesh allows a prompt fibroblastic response through the interstices of the mesh, encouraging complete tissue ingrowth, similar to polypropylene mesh alone. The visceral side of the mesh is a bioresorbable coating, separating the mesh from underlying tissue and organ surfaces to minimize tissue attachment to the mesh. Shortly after placement, the biopolymer coating becomes a hydrated gel that is resorbed from the site in less than 30 days.
#### Indication for Use:
The Ventralight ST Mesh is indicated for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue deficiencies, such as the repair of hernias.
#### Comparison to Predicate Devices:
The Ventralight ST Mesh has the same intended use and fundamental scientific technology as the predicate device. All technological characteristics of the Ventralight ST Mesh are the same as the predicate device including packaging, biocompatibility, sterilization, and labeling. The technological characteristics include a co-knitted PGA and polypropylene mesh layer to allow for tissue in-growth and a bioresorbable coating to minimize tissue attachment. The only difference between the predicate device and the proposed device is that the proposed device, Ventralight ST Mesh, is a low profile version of the predicate device. Sepramesh IP Mesh. By creating a low profile version of Sepramesh IP Mesh. minimum trocar sizes can be utilized for deployment of the mesh in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. To create a low profile version of Sepramesh IP Mesh, two minor modifications were required. The first modification is that the polypropylene mesh layer is now constructed of a lighter weight polypropylene monofilament which is identical in the polypropylene material composition and knit pattern and differs in diameter only by .001 in. The second modification is in the PGA layer. Additional PGA was added to fill in the interlayer spaces on the top layer to pull & the co-knitted PP/PGA mesh tighter to the top layer PGA fibers and the bioresorbable
“
{2}------------------------------------------------
coating. The overall knitting process remains the same. Where minor technological differences exist between the proposed device and the predicate device, performance testing demonstrates that these differences do not adversely affect the safety and effectiveness of the proposed device.
# Summary of Non-Clinical Testing:
Bench testing and animal studies were performed on the Ventralight ST Mesh to support substantial equivalence. Bench testing on the proposed device included PGA pullout strength testing, burst strength testing, tear strength testing, suture retention strength testing, dry bond strength testing, and hydrogel disruption testing after laparoscopic deployment. Predicate device testing included seal strength testing, package qualification testing, and biocompatibility testing as there were no packaging or material changes to the device. A 4 week post-implantation study in a porcine model was completed on the predicate device and proposed device to evaluate tissue attachment, mesh contracture, tissue in-growth, and host inflammatory and fibrotic response for both devices. Results of testing demonstrate that the Ventralight ST Mesh design meets product specifications and intended uses.
#### Statement of Equivalence:
The Ventralight ST Mesh has the same indications for use and technological characteristics as the predicate device. Based on this and the design and engineering data provided in the Premarket Notification, the proposed Ventralight ST Mesh has been shown to be substantially equivalent to the cleared Sepramesh IP Mesh.
וח
{3}------------------------------------------------
## DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its body and wing. The eagle is facing to the right. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Davol Inc., Subsidiary of C.R. Bard, Inc. % Ms. Michelle Godin Sr. Regulatory Affairs Associate 100 Crossings Boulevard Warwick, Rhode Island 02886
Re: K101851
Trade/Device Name: Ventralight ST Mesh Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical mesh Regulatory Class: II Product Code: FTL Dated: June 30, 2010 Received: July 1, 2010
Dear Ms. `Godin:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
JUL 1 5 2010
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Michelle Godin
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part.801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Sincerely yours,
for
Mark N. Melkerson
Director Division of Surgical, Orthopedic and Restorative Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
JUL 1 5 2010
- KIO 1851 510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Ventralight ST Mesh
The Ventralight ST Mesh is intended for use in the reconstruction of soft tissue deficiencies, such as for the repair of hernias.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
David Kinnebrew XKM
---
(Division Sign Off)
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices
510(k) Number K10/851
Page 1 of
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.