The Atlantis Abutment is intended for use with an endosseous implant to support a prosthetic device in a partially or completely edentulous patient. It is intended for use to support single and multiple tooth prosthesis, in the mandible or maxilla. The prosthesis can be cement or screw retained to the abutment. The abutment screw is intended to secure the abutment to the endosseous implant. This device is compatible with the following manufacturers' implant systems: The titanium abutments are compatible with the Dentsply 3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm and 7.0mm Ankylos Implants. Please note: This device may be used in an early load situation, but is dependent on the specific implant system and protocol used by the dental professional. Highly angled abutments (i.e. 30 degrees) on implants with diameters less than 4 mm are intended for the anterior region of the mouth and are not intended for the posterior region due to limited strength of the implant.
Device Story
Atlantis Abutment is a titanium alloy component used in dental implantology; connects endosseous implants to prosthetic restorations. Device consists of abutment and titanium screw; placed over implant shoulder; secured via screw. Used by dental professionals in clinical settings to support cement or screw-retained single/multiple tooth prostheses. Provides mechanical interface between implant fixture and artificial tooth; restores chewing function. Design ensures screw failure occurs before implant failure to protect fixture integrity. Compatible with Dentsply Ankylos implant systems (3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 7.0mm).
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. Substantial equivalence is based on bench testing and comparison of technological characteristics, materials, and intended use to legally marketed predicate devices.
Technological Characteristics
Material: Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F-136). Form factor: Abutment and screw for endosseous dental implants. Sizes: 3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm, 7.0mm. Mechanical connection: Screw-retained to implant fixture. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for partially or completely edentulous patients requiring single or multiple tooth prosthetic support in the mandible or maxilla. Contraindicated for highly angled abutments (30 degrees) on implants <4mm diameter in the posterior region due to limited strength.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant abutment is a premanufactured prosthetic component directly connected to the endosseous dental implant and is intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)
AtlantisTM Abutment for Dentsply Implant (K093780)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K101004
# AUG 1 6 2010
Pre-market Notification Page - 000009 ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
## VII. SECTION 10 - 510(K) SUMMARY
This summary of 510(k) substantial equivalence information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92.
Date of Summary preparation: April 1, 2010
#### 1. Applicant's Name and Address
Astra Tech Inc. 590 Lincoln Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 Telephone Number: 781-810-6462 Fax Number: 781-810-6719 Contact Person: Franklin Uyleman Director of Quality and Regulatory Affairs
#### 2. Name of Device
| Trade Name: | Atlantis™ Abutment for Dentsply Ankylos Implant |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Endosseous dental implant abutment |
| Classification Name: | Endosseous dental implant abutment<br>21 CFR 872.3630 Product code NHA |
#### 3. Legally Marketed Device to which Equivalence is claimed (Predicate Device)
| Manufacturer | Device | 510(k)<br>Number |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|------------------|
| Dentsply International,<br>Inc. | Ankylos C/X Dental Implant System | K083805 |
| Astra Tech Inc. | AtlantisTM Abutment for Dentsply<br>Implant | K093780 |
{1}------------------------------------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#### 4. Description of the Device
The devices covered in this submission are abutments which are placed into the dental implant to provide support for a prosthetic restoration. The subject abutments are indicated for cemented or screw retained restorations. The Atlantis™ Abutment for Dentsply Ankylos Implant and abutment screw are made from Titanium grade Ti-6A 1-4V ELI (meets ASTM Standard F-136) for the 3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm, and 7.0mm sizes. The titanium abutments are placed over the implant shoulder and are mounted into the implant with a titanium screw.
#### న్. Intended Use of the Device
The Atlantis Abutment is intended for use with an endosseous implant to support a prosthetic device in a partially or completely edentulous patient. It is intended for use to support single and multiple tooth prosthesis, in the mandible or maxilla. The prosthesis can be cement or screw retained to the abutment. The abutment screw is intended to secure the abutment to the endosseous implant.
This device is compatible with the following manufacturers' implant systems:
The titanium abutments are compatible with the Dentsply 3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm and 7.0mm Ankylos Implants.
Please note: This device may be used in an early load situation, but is dependent on the specific implant system and protocol used by the dental professional.
Highly angled abutments (i.e. 30 degrees) on implants with diameters less than 4 mm are intended for the anterior region of the mouth and are not intended for the posterior region due to limited strength of the implant.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Pre-market Notification Page - 000010a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#### Basis for Substantial Equivalence 6.
The Atlantis™ Abutments for Dentsply Ankylos Implants are substantially equivalent in intended use, material, design and performance to the Dentsply Ankylos C/X Dental Implant System cleared under K083805 and the Astra Tech Inc., Atlantis™ Abutment for Dentsply Implant cleared under K093780.
| Technological<br>Characteristics | Atlantis Abutment for<br>Dentsply Ankylos<br>Implants | Dentsply Ankylos C/X<br>Implant System |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Material | Titanium alloy | Titanium alloy |
| Performance<br>characteristics | Allows the prosthesis to be<br>cemented or screw<br>retained to the abutment.<br>While the abutment screw<br>is intended to secure the<br>abutment to the<br>endosseous implant · | Allows the prosthesis to be<br>cemented or screw<br>retained to the abutment.<br>While the abutment screw<br>is intended to secure the<br>abutment to the<br>endosseous implant |
| Intended Use | Intended for use with an<br>endosseous implant to<br>support a prosthetic device<br>in a partially or completely<br>endentulous patient.<br>Intended for use to support<br>single or multiple tooth<br>prosthesis, in mandible or<br>maxilla. | Intended for use with an<br>endosseous implant to<br>support a prosthetic device<br>in a partially or completely<br>endentulous patient.<br>Intended for use to support<br>single or multiple tooth<br>prosthesis, in mandible or<br>maxilla. |
Table 1:
{3}------------------------------------------------
00011
Pre-market Notification Page -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
## Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Concerns
Safety and effectiveness problems that have been encountered with similar abutment systems used with endosseous implants that are currently being marketed include:
I . occasional fractures of the screw attaching the abutment to the fixtures usually due to functional overload from masticastory forces;
2 screw working loose (usually because torque force below recommended values was applied when the abutment attached to the fixture) may lead to the formation of granulation tissue at the level of the fixture and abutment connection which may, in turn, result in infection;
3. improper initial seating of the abutments resulting in gingival inflammation and fistulae formation both conditions resolve when proper seating of the abunment is accomplished:
4. occasional fracture of the abutment screw which is usually caused by poorly designed and/or fabricated restorations that creates overloads or causes metal fatigue.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Summary of Safety and effectiveness Studies (continued)
## Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for Endosseous Implants for Prosthetic Attachments (Screw type/Two Stage .
The endosseous (dental) implant is made of a material, such as titanium or ceramic, intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, and to restore the patient's chewing function. The endosseous implant can be defined as a one stage or a tow stage implant system. These types include the blade, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. These implant systems are composed of the implant (including the abutments) and accessories utilized in the fabrication and alignment of the abutment for successful attachment of the prosthesis.
The two stage endosseous implant is an implant that is composed of two or more components and incorporates at least two surgical phases to prepare the implant for prosthetic attachment. These two surgical phases are 1). The placement of the first stage component into the mandibular or maxillary bone and 2). Subsequent uncovering, at a Iater time defined by the labeling, of the first stage to allow attachment of the abutment and other components of the endosseous implant.
During the initial phase of healing, most implant system advocate that the fixtures should be submerged (2-stage surgical procedure). The reasons for this approach are 1). To minimize infection, 2). To prevent the apical downgrowth of mucosal epithelium and 3). To minimize the risk of undue early loading. This means that a second surgical session is requested to connect the installed fixtures to the mucosally piercing abutments before a supraconstruction can be connected and loading can be permitted. However, it has been demonstrated that correct clinical bone anchorage can also be achieved using a nonsubmerged approach (1-stage surgical procedure).
Clinical results indicate that fixtures ca be properly osseointegrated in mandibular bone using a 1-stage surgical approach and successfully used for bridge retention. In addition, comparing the data from 2- to 1-stage surgical procedure, it is obvious that a steady-state condition will be reached in the implant after 12 months, irrespective of the surgical approach used.
For patients using different medicines or suffering from different circulatory diseases or r or passion it might be especially advantageous to install the implant pillar using 1-stage surgical procedure and thus avoid a second surgical session. Age is another factor to consider in this respect, as well as some psychological aspects, e.g. fear of the surgical procedure.
{5}------------------------------------------------
The screw type implant is characterized as having a solid cylindrical core with a continuous screw thread that circumscribes the length of the solid cylindrical core. Principle initial anchorage is achieved by mechanical interlock of the screw threads. Long term fixation is obtained by a direct bone/implant interface without a significant percentage of interlining fibrous tissue.
Accessory components to an endosseous implant include copings, replicas, healing caps, drills, taps, burrs, etc. that are utilized for preparing the anatomical site for implantation, for abutment attachment, and for assisting in the fabrication of the final prosthesis.
### Types of Safety and Effectiveness Problems
The type of safety and effectiveness problems identified below have been based on clinical database of information including all types of endosseous implants for prosthetic attachment (i.e. screw, blades, solid and hollow core cylinder endosseous implants). All of these risks are being included since the requirement of this summary is to identify all types of safety and effectiveness problems for the "generic" class of implants. These problems associated with endosseous implants for prosthetic attachment are based on two summary publications on this very subject. These publications are: Federal Register, Vol. 54, No. 234, pp. 50592-50595, December 7, 1989; and National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement, "Dental Implants," Vol. 7, No. 3, June 15. 1988. The problems are:
- 1. paresthesia
- 2. perforation of maxillary sinus
- 3. perforation of labial and lingual plates
- 4. infectious endocarditis (in susceptible individuals)
- 5. air embolism
- 6. implant integrity (e.g. fracture, delamination of coating, biocompatibility, etc.)
- 7. local sift tissue degeneration
- 8. hyperplasia.
- 9. progressive bone resorption
- 10. exfoliation
- 11. local and systemic infection (including long term bacterial infection)
- 12. Damage to existing dentition
- 13. implant mobility
{6}------------------------------------------------
Risks #1-5 are specific to the clinical placement of the implant (e.g. surgical procedure). These problems are reduced by adequate labeling and proper training of the clinician. Risk #6 depends both on the proper selection of implant material, implant design, proper placement of the implant(s) by the clinician, and properly designed, fabricated, and placed prosthetics. The remaining risks listed (#7-13) are affected by the implant material, implant design, proper placement of the implants by the clinician, properly designated/fabricated/placed prosthetics, and patient compliance/hygiene. The screw type implant is the only type of implant that has clinical studies to demonstrate the incidence of these problems.
### Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for fixtures and components to Endosseous Implants
Safety and effectiveness problems that have been experienced with similar fixtures used with currently marketed endosseous implant systems include:
- 1. The lack of osseointegration of fixture, sometimes resulting from poor subject choice, or deviation from the recommended surgical protocol
- 2. Possible excessive bone loss, often due to poor surgical technique or excessive prosthetic loads
- 3. Wound dehiscence, due to the patient wearing a denture over operated site too soon after the procedure, pradiation therapy for an oral malignancy, previous surgery on the site or improper surgical technique
- 4. The potential of fracture of the fixture due to blunt trauma or occlusal overload,
#### Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for Dental Hand Instruments
Safety and effectiveness problems that have been experienced with similar dental hand instruments include:
- 1. Potential for some of the accessories to be aspirated or swallowed
- 2. Potential for fracture of the tip of the screwdriver machine instrument due to excessive pressure
- 3. Potential for slippage of the instrument causing minor laceration due to excessive pressure or poor dental technique
{7}------------------------------------------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
## VIII. Substantial Equivalence
The Atlantis™ Abutment for Dentsply Ankylos Implant is part of an endosseous implant system designed for a single tooth or multiple unit bridge replacement. After a fixture has been inserted in the patient's jaw bone and the titanium abutment is attached to the fixture by means of an abutment screw. Atlantis abutment screw is designed to avoid the situation of having an abutment screw that is stronger than the implant such that the implant fails first. Ideally, with an abutment screw component that is weaker than the implant, the screw should fail first rather than the implant.
The Atlantis Abutment for Dentsply Ankylos Implant in titanium is substantially equivalent to the Dentsply Ankylos Dental Implant System presented in cleared 510K #083805 and the Astra Tech Inc., Atlantis Abutment for Dentsply Implant presented in cleared 510K #093780 in that the abutments respectively:
1. Allows the prosthesis to be cement or screw retained to the abutment. While the abutment screw is intended to secure the abutment to the endosseous implant.
2. These devices are used as connections with implant fixtures.
3. The Atlantis abutment in titanium, subject of this submission, are manufactured of titanium grade alloy Ti-6A1-4V ELI and when used with the Dentsply Ankylos implants, have the same performance characteristics of the predicate device abutment/implant systems.
As the above list of similarities indicates, the Atlantis™ Abutments for Dentsply Ankylos Implant and the predicate products have the same basic features, are made of equal material and are manufactured for the same general use.
We respectfully request FDA's concurrence with the conclusions noted above to support substantial equivalence.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of an eagle with its wings spread, symbolizing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans.
#### Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Astra Tech. Incorporated C/O Ms. Betsy A. Brown Consultant B.A. Brown & Associates 8944 Tamaroa Terrace Skokie, Illinois 60076
## AUG 1 6 - 2010
Re: K101004
Trade/Device Name: Atlantis™ Abutment for Dentsply Ankylos Implant Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3630 Regulation Name: Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment Regulatory Class: II Product Code: NHA Dated: August 2, 2010 Received: August 4, 2010
Dear Ms. Brown:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{9}------------------------------------------------
### Page 2- Ms. Brown
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely vours.
Nh for
Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
#### Enclosure
{10}------------------------------------------------
K101004
### Indications for Use
AUG 1 6 2010
510(k) Number (if Known)
Device Name: Atlantis TM Abutment for Dentsply Ankylos Implant
Indication for Use:
The Atlantis Abutment is intended for use with an endosseous implant to support a prosthetic device in a partially or completely edentulous patient. It is intended for use to support single and multiple tooth prosthesis, in the mandible or maxilla. The prosthesis can be cement or screw retained to the abutment. The abutment screw is intended to secure the abutment to the endosseous implant.
This device is compatible with the following manufacturers' implant systems:
The titanium abutments are compatible with the Dentsply 3.5mm, 4.5mm, 5.5mm and 7.0mm Ankylos Implants:
Please note: This device may be used in an early load situation, but is dependent on the specific implant system and protocol used by the dental professional. Highly angled abutments (i.e. 30 degrees) on implants with diameters less than 4 mm are intended for the anterior region of the mouth and are not intended for the posterior region due to limited strength of the implant.
Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 SubpartD) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Kein Mulvey for MSR
(Division Sign-Off) (Division Sign-Off)
Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital
Division of Anesthesiology, General Devices Division of Ancolnoon Dental Devices
510(k) Number:
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.