BD PROBETEC NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE (GC) QX AMPLIFIED DNA ASSAY
K090827 · Becton, Dickinson & CO · LSL · May 27, 2009 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K090827
Device Name
BD PROBETEC NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE (GC) QX AMPLIFIED DNA ASSAY
Applicant
Becton, Dickinson & CO
Product Code
LSL · Microbiology
Decision Date
May 27, 2009
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3390
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K090827 · May 27, 2009
BD PROBETEC NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE (GC) QX AMPLIFIED DNA ASSAY
Becton, Dickinson & CO
Clinical specimens (endocervical and PreservCyt) collected from patients in routine clinical settings (family planning, OB/GYN, and STD clinics)
Clinical performance evaluation of the BD ProbeTec GC Qx Assay compared to a patient infected status (PIS) algorithm derived from reference NAAT methods.
Multi-site clinical evaluation of diagnostic performance
2,074 female subjects attending family planning, OB/GYN, and sexually transmitted disease clinics; Sample Size: 2074; Number of Sites: 11
Patient Infected Status (PIS) algorithm based on three reference NAAT methods
Sensitivity and specificity for detection of N. gonorrhoeae in PreservCyt specimens
Indications for Use
The BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) Q® Amplified DNA Assay, when tested with the BD Viper™ System in Extracted Mode, uses Strand Displacement Amplification technology for the direct, qualitative detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA in clinician-collected female endocervical and male urethral swab specimens, patient-collected vaginal swab specimens (in a clinical setting), and male and female urine specimens (both UPT and Neat). The assay is also intended for use with gynecological specimens collected in PreservCyt® Solution using an aliquot that is removed prior to processing for additional gynecological testing. The assay is indicated for use with asymptomatic and symptomatic females and symptomatic males to aid in the diagnosis of gonococcal urogenital disease.
Device Story
Assay uses Strand Displacement Amplification (SDA) to detect Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA. Input: clinical specimens (swabs, urine, PreservCyt). Process: BD Viper System performs automated chemical lysis, DNA binding to para-magnetic particles, washing, and elution. Purified DNA is transferred to Priming Microwells (rehydration) then Amplification Microwells (enzymatic SDA). System monitors fluorescence via thermally-controlled readers. Output: qualitative result (positive/negative/EC failure) based on MaxRFU compared to threshold. Used in clinical labs; operated by technicians. Provides automated diagnostic aid for gonococcal urogenital disease; enables rapid, high-throughput testing.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study evaluated 2074 female subjects across 11 sites. Sensitivity and specificity calculated against a Patient Infected Status (PIS) algorithm (based on three reference NAATs). Overall sensitivity 95.3% (41/43), specificity 99.95% (2030/2031). Symptomatic sensitivity 100%, asymptomatic sensitivity 92.3%. Reproducibility study confirmed performance across three sites and systems with 100% correct results for target levels at/above LOD.
Technological Characteristics
Strand Displacement Amplification (SDA) technology. Reagents: amplification primers, fluorescently-labeled detector probe, DNA polymerase, restriction endonuclease. Extraction: ferric oxide particles, magnetic separation. Instrument: BD Viper™ System (automated extraction and fluorescent reader). Connectivity: standalone system. Software: automated algorithm for signal processing and result reporting. Threshold: 125 MaxRFU.
Indications for Use
Indicated for asymptomatic and symptomatic females and symptomatic males to aid in the diagnosis of gonococcal urogenital disease using endocervical, urethral, vaginal, urine, or PreservCyt gynecological specimens.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Neisseria spp. direct serological test reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify Neisseria spp. from cultured isolates. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of Neisseria spp. antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) which may be used to detect the presence of Neisseria spp. directly from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Neisseria, such as epidemic cerebrospinal meningitis, meningococcal disease, and gonorrhea, and also provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these microorganisms. The device does not include products for the detection of gonorrhea in humans by indirect methods, such as detection of antibodies or of oxidase produced by gonococcal organisms.
Predicate Devices
BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) Qx Amplified DNA Assay (K081825)
Gen-Probe APTIMA Assay for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (AGC) (K062440)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number: K090827
B. Purpose for Submission: Addition of the PreservCyt® Solution as a new specimen type taken from gynecological swab specimens stored in PreservCyt® Solution. The BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) Q® Amplified DNA Assay" and BD Viper™ System were previously cleared (K081825).
C. Measurand: Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA
D. Type of Test: Qualitative determination of Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA using the Strand Displacement Amplification technology
E. Applicant: BD Diagnostic System
F. Proprietary and Established Names: BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) Q® Amplified DNA Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LSL | Class II | 21CFR 866.3390 Neisseria spp. direct serological test reagents | Microbiology (83) |
H. Intended Use:
The BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) Q® Amplified DNA Assay, when tested with the BD Viper™ System in Extracted Mode, uses Strand Displacement Amplification technology for the direct, qualitative detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA in clinician-collected female endocervical and male urethral swab specimens, patient-collected vaginal swab specimens (in a clinical setting), and male and female urine specimens (both UPT and Neat). The assay is also intended for use with gynecological specimens collected in PreservCyt® Solution using an aliquot that is removed prior to processing for additional gynecological testing. The assay is indicated for use with asymptomatic and symptomatic females and symptomatic males to aid in the diagnosis of gonococcal urogenital disease.
3) Special conditions for use statement(s): For Prescription use only
4) Special instrument requirements: BD Viper™ System with automated nucleic acid extraction mode
{1}
I. Device Description: The BD ProbeTec GC Q® Amplified DNA Assay is based on the simultaneous amplification and detection of target DNA using amplification primers and a fluorescently-labeled detector probe. The reagents for SDA are dried in two separate disposable microwells: the Priming Microwell contains the amplification primers, fluorescently-labeled detector probe, nucleotides and other reagents necessary for amplification, while the Amplification Microwell contains the two enzymes (a DNA polymerase and a restriction endonuclease) that are required for SDA. The BD Viper™ System pipettes a portion of the purified DNA solution from each Extraction Tube into a Priming Microwell to rehydrate the contents. After a brief incubation, the reaction mixture is transferred to a corresponding, pre-warmed Amplification Microwell which is sealed to prevent contamination and then incubated in one of the two thermally-controlled fluorescent readers. The presence or absence of N. gonorrhoeae DNA is determined by calculating the peak fluorescence (Maximum Relative Fluorescent Units (MaxRFU)) over the course of the amplification process and by comparing this measurement to a predetermined threshold value.
In addition to the fluorescent probe used to detect amplified N. gonorrhoeae target DNA, a second labeled oligonucleotide is incorporated in each reaction. The Extraction Control (EC) oligonucleotide is labeled with a different dye than that used for detection of the N. gonorrhoeae -specific target and is used to confirm the validity of the extraction process. The EC is dried in the Extraction Tubes and is rehydrated upon addition of the specimen and extraction reagents. At the end of the extraction process, the EC fluorescence is monitored by the BD Viper System and an automated algorithm is applied to both the EC and N. gonorrhoeae -specific signals to report results as positive, negative, or EC failure.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
a) Predicate device name (s):
BD ProbeTec™ Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) Q® Amplified DNA Assay Gen-Probe APTIMA Assay for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (AGC)
b) Predicate Numbers (s):
K081825
K062440
Comparison with predicate:
Device Comparison: GCQ Assay Specimen Collection and Processing on the BD Viper System in Extracted Mode
{2}
3
| | BD ProbeTec GCQ Assay, PreservCyt Solution Specimens (Device) | BD ProbeTec GCQ Assay, Swab and Urine Specimens (K081825) | Gen-Probe AGC (K062440) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen Types | • Same as K081825
• Gynecological specimen in PreservCyt® Solution | • Endocervical swab (females)
• Vaginal self-collected swab (in a clinical setting) (females)
• Urethral swab (males)
• Neat urine (female and male)
• UPT urine (female and male) | • Endocervical swab (females)
• Vaginal swab (females)
• Urethral swab (males)
• Neat urine (female and male)
• UTT urine (female and male)
• Gynecological specimen in PreservCyt® Solution |
| Specimen Collection and Transport Accessories | • Same as K081825
• Liquid Based Cytology Specimen (LBC) Dilution Tube | • Endocervical kit
• Urethral kit
• Vaginal kit
• UPT
• Neat urine (Qx Sample Tube) | • Unisex swab kit
• Vaginal swab kit
• Urine collection kit
• Specimen transfer kit (for gynecological specimen in PreservCyt® Solution) |
## Device Comparison: Specimen Collection
| | BD ProbeTec GCQ Assay, PreservCyt Solution Specimens (Device) | Gen-Probe AGC (K062440) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen Collection | • Gynecological specimen collected and placed in PreservCyt® Solution (per Cytyc Corporation’s instructions for use).
• Sample for CTQ/GCQ testing is drawn from original cytology specimen vial before the specimen is processed for cytology testing. | • Gynecological specimen collected and placed in PreservCyt® Solution (per Cytyc Corporation’s instructions for use).
• LBC specimen is first processed for cytology and then an aliquot is drawn from the remaining specimen in the vial for CT/GC testing. |
## Device Comparison: Specimen Processing
| | BD ProbeTec GCQ Assay, PreservCyt Solution Specimens (Device) | BD ProbeTec GCQ Assay, Swab and Urine Specimens (K081825) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Specimen Processing | • Same as K081825 without the 15 minute pre-warm step for LBC Dilution Tube specimens
• Use of LBC Specimen Rack to prevent prewarming of LBC specimens | Pre-warm specimens (swabs and urines) for 15 minutes before running BD Viper System |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices, May 11, 2005. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/337.pdf
2. CLSI EP5-A2 “Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods”,
{3}
3. CLSI EP12-A “User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance”.
L. Test Principle:
The BD ProbeTec GC Q⁰ Amplified DNA Assay is designed for use with the BD ProbeTec Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae (CT/GC) Q⁰ specimen collection and transport devices, applicable reagents, the BD Viper System and BD Fox Extraction. Specimens are collected and transported in their respective transport devices which preserve the integrity of the N. gonorrhoeae DNA over the specified ranges of temperature and time.
Urine and swab specimens undergo a pre-warm step in the BD Viper Lysing Heater to dissolve mucus and homogenize the specimen. After cooling, the specimens are loaded onto the BD Viper System which then performs all the steps involved in extraction and amplification of target DNA, without further user intervention. The specimen is transferred to an Extraction Tube that contains ferric oxide particles in a dissolvable film and dried Extraction Control. A high pH is used to lyse the bacterial cells and liberate their DNA into solution. Acid is then added to lower the pH and induce a positive charge on the ferric oxide, which in turn binds the negatively charged DNA. The particles and bound DNA are then pulled to the sides of the Extraction Tube by magnets and the treated specimen is aspirated to waste. The particles are washed and a high pH Elution Buffer is added to recover the purified DNA. Finally, a Neutralization Buffer is used to bring the pH of the extracted solution to the optimum for amplification of the target.
The BD ProbeTec GC Q⁰ Amplified DNA Assay is based on the simultaneous amplification and detection of target DNA using amplification primers and a fluorescently-labeled detector probe. The reagents for SDA are dried in two separate disposable microwells: the Priming Microwell contains the amplification primers, fluorescently-labeled detector probe, nucleotides and other reagents necessary for amplification, while the Amplification Microwell contains the two enzymes (a DNA polymerase and a restriction endonuclease) that are required for SDA. The BD Viper System pipettes a portion of the purified DNA solution from each Extraction Tube into a Priming Microwell to rehydrate the contents. After a brief incubation, the reaction mixture is transferred to a corresponding, pre-warmed Amplification Microwell which is sealed to prevent contamination and then incubated in one of the two thermally-controlled fluorescent readers. The presence or absence of N. gonorrhoeae DNA is determined by calculating the peak fluorescence (Maximum Relative Fluorescent Units (MaxRFU)) over the course of the amplification process and by comparing this measurement to a predetermined threshold value.
In addition to the fluorescent probe used to detect amplified N. gonorrhoeae target DNA, a second fluorescently-labeled oligonucleotide is incorporated in each reaction. The Extraction Control (EC) oligonucleotide is labeled with a different dye than that used for detection of the N. gonorrhoeae-specific target and is used to confirm the validity of the extraction process. The EC is dried in the Extraction Tubes and is re-hydrated upon addition of the specimen and extraction reagents. At the end of the extraction process, the EC fluorescence is monitored by the BD Viper instrument and an automated
4
{4}
algorithm is applied to both the EC and $N$ . gonorrhoeae-specific signals to report specimen results as positive, negative, or EC failure.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A reproducibility study of the BD Viper System using the BD ProbeTec GC $\mathbf{Q}^{\mathrm{x}}$ Assay was evaluated for Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) specimens at three clinical sites on one BD Viper System per site. A panel of simulated specimens comprising CT and GC organisms seeded into LBC Specimen Dilution Tubes containing PreservCyt Solution was tested with the BD ProbeTec GC $\mathbf{Q}^{\mathrm{x}}$ Assay. Uninoculated LBC Specimen Dilution Tubes containing PreservCyt Solution were used for the GC negative samples. Nine replicates of each panel member were tested every day for five days on each BD Viper System. The data are summarized in the table below.
Summary of Reproducibility Data for LBC Specimens on the BD Viper System for the GC $\mathbf{Q}^{\mathrm{x}}$ Assay
| | | | | | Within Run | | Between Runs Within Site | | Between Site | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CT EB's/mL | GC Cells/mL | % Correct | 95% CI | Mean MaxRFU | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| 0 | 0 | 100.0% (135/135) | (97.3% - 100.0%) | 1.21 | 4.00 | 330.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 30 | 0 | 100.0% (135/135) | (97.3% - 100.0%) | 0.98 | 7.47 | 761.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 17.04 |
| 0 | 100 | 100.0% (135/135) | (97.3% - 100.0%) | 1982.77 | 83.92 | 4.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 30 | 250 | 100.0% (135/135) | (97.3% - 100.0%) | 1983.66 | 87.76 | 4.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24.8 | 1.25 |
| 75 | 100 | 100.0% (135/135) | (97.3% - 100.0%) | 1920.14 | 81.94 | 4.27 | 59.45 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Two additional levels were included in the panels to characterize the reproducibility of test results (i.e., proportion positive or negative) at target levels below the analytical Limit of Detection (LOD) of the BD ProbeTec GC $\mathbf{Q}^{\mathrm{x}}$ Assay. These additional specimens comprised CT and GC organisms seeded into LBC Specimen Dilution Tubes containing PreservCyt Solution at dilutions of 1:10 and 1:100 of the respective analytical LODs of each analyte. These levels were selected to fall within the dynamic range of the analytical LOD curves for the BD ProbeTec CT $\mathbf{Q}^{\mathrm{x}}$ and GC $\mathbf{Q}^{\mathrm{x}}$ assays. Nine replicates of each panel member were tested every day for five days across the three BD Viper Systems. The data are summarized in the table below.
{5}
6
# Characterization of System Reproducibility at Target Levels below the Analytical Limit of Detection for the GC Q^x Assay for LBC Specimens
| Dilution of Analytical LOD | % Positive | 95% CI (Positive) | MaxRFU Mean (Positive) | % Negative | 95% CI (Negative) | MaxRFU Mean (Negative) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1:10 | 74.1 (100/135) | (65.8 - 81.2) | 1159.2 | 25.9 (35/135) | (18.8 - 34.2) | 21.2 |
| 1:100 | 8.9 (12/135) | (4.7 - 15.0) | 1136.5 | 91.1 (123/135) | (85.0 - 95.3) | 6.6 |
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range: NA
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): A total of 142 positive and 142 negative assay controls were tested a sufficient number of times with acceptable results on all testing days at all testing sites. Additionally, a total of 71 processing controls were tested a sufficient number of times with acceptable results on all testing days at all testing sites.
## d. Detection limit: The Limits of Detection (LODs) for the GC Q^x Assay with Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain ATCC 19424 in PreservCyt specimens when extracted on the BD Viper System were determined to be ≤ 100 GC cells per mL. The GC Q^x Assay on the BD Viper System in extracted mode was able to detect 17 GC strains with ≥ 95% proportion positive at a concentration of 50 cells per mL in clean diluted PreservCyt Solution.
## e. Analytical specificity:
1. Cross Reactivity: Same as described in K081825 submission. Cross reactivity studies were not repeated for this submission.
2. Interference: The performance of the BD ProbeTec GC Q^x Assay on the BD Viper System in extracted mode was evaluated in the presence of potential interfering substances which may be encountered in swab, urine, and/or PreservCyt specimens. Potential interfering substances were spiked into UPT urine and vaginal swab specimen matrices as well as PreservCyt specimens in LBC Specimen Dilution Tubes, in both the presence and the absence of GC organisms (150 GC cells/mL in urine matrix and 300 GC cells/mL in swab/LBC Specimen Dilution Tube matrix). Results are summarized in the following table.
{6}
GC Q⁺ Interfering Substances.
| Interpretation | Swab | Urine | PreservCyt |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| No Interference Observed | Blood (≤60%)
Seminal Fluid
Mucus
Over The Counter vaginal products and contraceptives
Hemorrhoidal cream
Prescription vaginal treatments
Leukocytes (1x10⁶ cells/mL)
1x10⁶ cells/mL Neisseria gonorrhoeae | Blood (≤1%)
Seminal fluid
Mucus
Antibiotics
Analgesics
Phenazopyridine
Over The Counter deodorant sprays and powders
Hormones
Leukocytes
Albumin <1 mg/mL
Glucose
Acidic urine (pH 4.0)
Alkaline urine (pH 9.0)
Bilirubin
1x10⁶ cells/mL Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Organisms associated with Urinary Tract Infections | Blood (≤1%)
Seminal Fluid
Mucus
Over The Counter vaginal products and contraceptives
Hemorrhoidal cream
Prescription vaginal treatments
Leukocytes (1x10⁶ cells/mL)
1x10⁶ cells/mL Neisseria gonorrhoeae |
| May cause extraction control (EC) failures | Blood (>60%) | Not applicable | Glacial Acetic Acid + Blood (≤5%/1% V/V) |
| May cause False Negative results | Not applicable | Not applicable | Glacial Acetic Acid + Blood (≤5%/1% V/V) |
f. Assay cut-off: NA
g. Cross Contamination and Carryover: An internal study was conducted to evaluate the risk of producing a false positive result in either the same run on the BD Viper System in extracted mode (within run cross-contamination) or in a subsequent run (between run carryover). Testing was conducted using negative and positive samples on three BD Viper Systems. Negative samples consisted of CT/GC Q⁺ Swab Diluent/LBC Specimen Dilution Tube with PreservCyt Solution. Positive samples consisted of a representative analyte (10⁵ CT EB/mL) spiked into CT/GC Q⁺ Swab Diluent/LBC Specimen Dilution Tube with PreservCyt Solution. The overall rate of cross-contamination (i.e., with alternating columns of positive and negative samples and a prevalence of 50%) was 0.41% (9/2208) for the CT/GC Q⁺ Swab Diluent and 0.45% (5/1104) for the LBC Specimen Dilution Tube with PreservCyt Solution. The overall rate of carryover contamination (i.e., carryover between successive runs when the prevalence was 50% in the previous run) was 0.36% (8/2208) for the CT/GC Q⁺ Swab Diluent and 0.54% (6/1104) for the LBC Specimen Dilution Tube with PreservCyt Solution. Cross-contamination and carryover contamination across the three BD Viper Systems are summarized in the following table.
{7}
Cross Contamination and Carryover Contamination (PreservCyt)
| Media Type | BD Viper System | Cross-Contamination | | | Carryover Contamination | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | n | Positive Results | Percent Positive | n | Positive Results | Percent Positive |
| PreservCyt Solution | 1 | 368 | 1 | 0.27 | 368 | 1 | 0.27 |
| | 2 | 368 | 3 | 0.82 | 368 | 0 | 0.00 |
| | 3 | 368 | 1 | 0.27 | 368 | 5 | 0.45 |
| | Overall | 1104 | 5 | 0.45 | 1104 | 6 | 0.54 |
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate method: See below under Performance Characteristics
b. Matrix comparison: NA
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: See under performance characteristics
b. Clinical specificity: See under performance characteristics
Performance Characteristics
PreservCyt Specimen Clinical Study
Endocervical swab specimens and PreservCyt specimens were collected from 2079 compliant female subjects attending family planning, OB/GYN, and sexually transmitted disease clinics at eleven geographically diverse clinical sites in North America. Subjects were classified as symptomatic if they reported symptoms such as dysuria, coital pain/difficulty/bleeding, abnormal vaginal discharge, or pelvic/uterine/adnexal pain. Subjects were classified as asymptomatic if they did not report symptoms. Two subjects were excluded due to an undetermined patient infected status. Three subjects did not have a PreservCyt specimen result. Therefore there were 2074 subjects evaluated.
Three randomized endocervical swab specimens and a PreservCyt specimen were collected from each female subject. The three reference endocervical swabs were tested with the BD ProbeTec ET CT/GC/AC assay, the BD ProbeTec GC Q⁰ assay, and another commercially available NAAT (Nucleic Acid Amplification Test). Sensitivity and specificity for PreservCyt specimens were calculated by comparing results to a patient infected status (PIS) algorithm. The designation of positive or negative PIS was based on the endocervical swab specimen results from the three reference methods. At least two positive reference results were required to establish a subject as PIS-positive. At least two negative reference results were required to establish a subject as PIS-negative. Data are presented in the following tables.
{8}
Summary of Cervical Sampling Devices Used in the PreservCyt Specimen Clinical Study
| Cervical Sampling Device Used | Clinical Collection Site Number | | | | | | | | | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
| Broom-Type Device | 89 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 16 | 464 | 272 | 83 | 0 | 99 | 0 | 1068 |
| Spatula/Cytobrush | 74 | 154 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 209 | 282 | 0 | 145 | 1011 |
GC Q* Assay Performance for PreservCyt Specimens Compared to Patient Infected Status (by symptomatic status)
| | | Performance Compared to Patient Infected Status | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Symptomatic Status | n | Sensitivity | 95% C.I. | Specificity | 95% C.I. | PPV% | NPV% | Error Initial/Final |
| A | 1349 | 92.3% (24/26) | (74.9% - 99.1%) | 100.0% (1323/1323) | (99.7% - 100.0%) | 100% | 99.9% | 1/0 |
| S | 725 | 100.0% (17/17) | (80.5% - 100.0%) | 99.9% (707/708) | (99.2% - 100.0%) | 95.9% | 100% | 0/0 |
| Total | 2074 | 95.3% (41/43) | (84.2% - 99.4%) | 99.95% (2030/2031) | (99.7% - 100.0%) | 100% | 99.9% | 1/0 |
GC Q* Assay Performance for PreservCyt Specimens Compared to Patient Infected Status (by clinical site)
| | | | Performance Compared to Patient Infected Status | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Collection Site | Prevalence | n | Sensitivity | 95% C.I. | Specificity | 95% C.I. | # CT (+) and GC (+) | PPV % | NPV % |
| 1 | 5.5% | 163 | 88.9% (8/9) | (51.8% - 99.7%) | 100.0% (154/154) | (97.6% - 100.0%) | 5 | 100.0 % | 99.4% |
| 2 | 5.2% | 154 | 100.0% (8/8) | (63.1% - 100.0%) | 99.3% (145/146) | (96.2% - 100.0%) | 1 | 88.7% | 100.0 % |
| 3 | 3.2% | 95 | 100.0% (3/3) | (29.2% - 100.0%) | 100.0% (92/92) | (96.1% - 100.0%) | 2 | 100.0 % | 100.0 % |
| 4 | 13.3% | 45 | 100.0% (6/6) | (54.1% - 100.0%) | 100.0% (39/39) | (91.0% - 100.0%) | 2 | 100.0 % | 100.0 % |
| 5 | 0.0% | 16 | NA | NA | 100.0% (16/16) | (79.4% - 100.0%) | 0 | NA | NA |
| 6 | 1.6% | 516 | 100.0% (8/8) | (63.1% - 100.0%) | 100.0% (508/508) | (99.3% - 100.0%) | 2 | 100.0 % | 100.0 % |
| 7 | 2.9% | 272 | 87.5% (7/8) | (47.3% - 99.7%) | 100.0% (264/264) | (98.6% - 100.0%) | 3 | 100.0 % | 99.6% |
| 8 | 0.0% | 292 | NA | NA | 100.0% (292/292) | (98.7% - 100.0%) | 0 | NA | NA |
{9}
10
| | | | Performance Compared to Patient Infected Status | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Collection Site | Prevalence | n | Sensitivity | 95% C.I. | Specificity | 95% C.I. | # CT (+) and GC (+) | PPV % | NPV % |
| 9 | 0.0% | 282 | NA | NA | 100.0% (282/282) | (98.7% - 100.0%) | 0 | NA | NA |
| 10 | 0.0% | 97 | NA | NA | 100.0% (97/97) | (96.3% - 100.0%) | 0 | NA | NA |
| 11 | 0.7% | 142 | 100.0% (1/1) | (2.5% - 100.0%) | 100.0% (141/141) | (97.4% - 100.0%) | 0 | 100.0 % | 100.0 % |
GC Q⁵ Assay Performance for PreservCyt Specimens Compared to Patient Infected Status (by clinic type)
| | | | Performance Compared to Patient Infected Status | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clinic Type | Prevalence | n | Sensitivity | 95% C.I. | Specificity | 95% C.I. | PPV % | NPV % |
| Family Planning | 0.7% | 1187 | 100.0% (8/8) | (63.1% - 100.0%) | 100.0% (1179/1179) | (99.7% - 100.0%) | 100.0 % | 100.0 % |
| OB/GYN | 3.0% | 367 | 90.9% (10/11) | (58.7% - 99.8%) | 100.0% (356/356) | (99.0% - 100.0%) | 100.0 % | 99.7% |
| STD | 4.6% | 520 | 95.8% (23/24) | (78.9% - 99.9%) | 99.8% (495/496) | (98.9% - 100.0%) | 95.9% | 99.8% |
Analysis of GC Positive/Negative PreservCyt Specimens Based on Patient Infected Status
| | | | | | Symptomatic Status | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PIS GC | AC2 Swab | ProbeTec Swab | Viper Swab | PreservCyt | A | S | Table 13C: Total |
| + | NA | + | + | + | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| | + | - | + | - | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| | + | - | + | + | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| | + | + | NA | + | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| | + | + | + | - | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| | + | + | + | + | 21 | 14 | 35 |
| Total PIS Positive | | | | | 26 | 17 | 43 |
| - | NA | - | - | - | 181 | 79 | 260 |
| | - | I | - | - | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| | - | - | NA | - | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| | - | - | LE | - | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| | - | - | - | - | 1129 | 624 | 1753 |
| | - | - | - | + | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| | - | - | + | - | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| | - | + | - | - | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| | + | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Total PIS Negative | | | | | 1323 | 708 | 2031 |
{10}
4. Clinical cut-off: Clinical cut-off was validated during the swab and urine clinical trial (K081825). The cutoff was 125 MaxRFU (> 125 MaxRFU = positive; < 125 MaxRFU = negative). The same cutoff was utilized for the clinical trial to validate the performance of the PreservCyt Solution specimens when tested with the GCQ assay on the BD Viper System in extracted mode.
# 5. Expected values/Reference range:
A. Prevalence: The prevalence of positive $N$ gonorrhoeae specimens in patient populations depends upon: clinic type, age, risk factors, gender, and test method. The prevalence observed with the GC $Q^{\mathrm{x}}$ Assay during a multi-center clinical trial for PreservCyt specimens ranged from 0.0% to 13.3% based on the data presented in the table "GC $Q^{\mathrm{x}}$ Assay Performance for PreservCyt Specimens Compared to Patient Infected Status (by clinical site)" under performance.
B. Positive and Negative Predictive Value: Hypothetical positive and negative predictive values (PPV & NPV) for the GC $Q^{\mathrm{x}}$ Assay from the multi-center clinical trial for PreservCyt specimens are shown in the following table. These calculations are based on hypothetical prevalence and overall sensitivity and specificity (compared to the patient infected status) of $95.3\%$ and $99.95\%$ for PreservCyt specimens.
GC Hypothetical Positive and Negative Predictive Values (PreservCyt) Compared to Patient Infected Status
| Prevalence (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | 95.3 | 99.95 | 97.5 | 99.9 |
| 5 | 95.3 | 99.95 | 99.0 | 99.8 |
| 10 | 95.3 | 99.95 | 99.5 | 99.5 |
| 20 | 95.3 | 99.95 | 99.8 | 98.8 |
| 30 | 95.3 | 99.95 | 99.9 | 98.0 |
| 40 | 95.3 | 99.95 | 99.9 | 97.0 |
| 50 | 95.3 | 99.95 | 99.9 | 95.5 |
N. Instrument: Same as described in K081825.
O. System Descriptions: Same as described in K081825
P. Other Supportive Device and Instrument Information: NA
Q. Proposed Labeling: The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion: The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.