The Sofia™ (ATUS) device is indicated for use as a B-mode ultrasonic imaging system for imaging of a patient's breast when used with an automatic scanning linear array transducer. The device is not intended to be used as a replacement for screening mammography.
Device Story
Sofia™ (ATUS) is an automated breast ultrasound system; consists of exam table with pyramid-shaped dome, motor drive, fluidics system, and ultrasound probe. Patient lies prone with breast in pendulous position within fluid-filled dome; eliminates need for breast compression. Device uses automated linear array transducer to acquire serial 2D B-mode grayscale ultrasound images of entire breast. System integrates with commercially available ultrasound system (GE LOGIQ e) to acquire and store data. Radiologist reviews 2D images to identify abnormal anatomical features. Facilitates diagnostic breast imaging; provides alternative to manual compression-based ultrasound systems.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Included mechanical performance evaluations, simulated use tests, and acoustic output testing. Conformance to IEC 60601 series electrical and electromagnetic safety standards verified.
Technological Characteristics
Automated B-mode ultrasonic imaging system. Uses linear array transducer (GE 12L-RS, 7-11 MHz). Components: exam table, motor drive, fluidics system. Connectivity: integrates with GE LOGIQ e ultrasound system. Standards: IEC 60601-1, UL 60601-1, CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1-M90, IEC 60601-1-2.
Indications for Use
Indicated for B-mode ultrasonic imaging of the breast in patients requiring diagnostic ultrasound examination. Not intended as a replacement for screening mammography.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A diagnostic ultrasonic transducer is a device made of a piezoelectric material that converts electrical signals into acoustic signals and acoustic signals into electrical signals and intended for use in diagnostic ultrasonic medical devices. Accessories of this generic type of device may include transmission media for acoustically coupling the transducer to the body surface, such as acoustic gel, paste, or a flexible fluid container.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K080555
JUN - 3, 2008
# Section 2 - 510(k) Summary and Certification
[As required by 21 CFR 807.92(c)]
#### 1. Contact Person
Mark L. Stribling President & CEO iVu Imaging Corporation www.ivuimaging.com 4121 Grace Ln, Grapevine, TX 76051-6586 Tel: 817-545-9766 Fax: 817-354-0062 Email: mstribling@ivuimaging.com
# 2. General Information
| Name: | iVu Imaging Corporation |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Name: | Sofia™ (ATUS) Imaging Device |
| Classification Name: | Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic |
| Classification: | This device is classified by the Reproductive, Abdominal<br>and Radiological Devices into Class II, (21 CFR 892.1560<br>Ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system and 892.1570<br>Diagnostic ultrasonic transducer) |
## 3. Device Description
The Sofia™ (ATUS) device consists of three (3) major components 1) an exam table which houses the examination pyramid, motor drive assembly, fluidics evacuation and storage system, and the power supply assembly 2) an ultrasound probe which is embedded into the exam pyramid on one end and connected to the ultrasound system on the other end, 3) an ultrasound system that acquires and stores the ultrasound data from the patient's breast exam.
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Sofia™ (ATUS) device, as well as, the two predicate devices (Trade Name: FFBU Diagnostic Ultrasound System manufactured by U-Systems, Inc (K032640), Trade Name: ABUS Diagnostic Ultrasound System manufactured by U-Systems, Inc (K052355) utilize standard B-Mode grayscale ultrasound to achieve their intended use. Both the Sofia™ (ATUS) device and the U-Systems FFBU and ABUS systems use automated linear ultrasound transducers to evaluate breast tissue. The Sofia™ (ATUS) device, as well as, the U-Systems FFBU and ABUS systems all use automated linear transducers to acquire serial 2D grayscale images of the entire breast. These 2D images can then be reviewed by a radiologist to determine if any abnormal anatomical features are present in the patient's breast. The Sofia™ (ATUS) system utilizes the same mode of operations, general operating principals, as well as, general and specific indications for use as the predicate devices described above.
## 4. Intended Use
The Sofia™ (ATUS) device is indicated for use as a B-mode ultrasonic imaging system for imaging of a patient's breast when used with an automatic scanning linear array transducer. The device is not intended to be used as a replacement for screening mammography.
#### 5. Substantial Equivalence Comparison
The iVu Sofia™ (ATUS) device is substantially equivalent to the following devices with respect to intended use, design, materials and construction:
- The FFBU Diagnostic Ultrasound System manufactured by U-. Systems, Inc (K032640)
- . The ABUS Diagnostic Ultrasound System manufactured by U-Systems, Inc (K052355).
Section 4 of this 510K shows much more detail relative to specific similarities and differences between the Sofia™ (ATUS) system and the predicate devices; also a table is provided for clarity. The Sofia™ (ATUS) device and the predicate devices are substantially equivalent in their intended uses and / or device design. In addition to the similar intended use, all of the predicate devices utilize B-Mode Grayscale Ultrasound to achieve their intended use. Both the Sofia™ (ATUS) and the predicate devices use automated linear ultrasound transducers to image breast tissue. Both the Sofia™ (ATUS) device and the predicate devices use commercially available FDA 510K approved ultrasound systems to acquire ultrasound images.
{2}------------------------------------------------
The Sofia™ (ATUS) system uses the GE LOGIQ e (K050126). The U-Systems ABUS and FFBU systems use the Siemens Antares DUS (K023720). Refer to Attachment I for a copy of the GE Medical Systems 510K (K050126).
A brief discussion of the similarities and differences between the Sofia™ (ATUS) device and its predicate devices is provided below.
#### Similarities
- Similar to the Sofia™ (ATUS), the U-Systems FFBU system uses an automated . linear transducer to acquire serial 2D images of the patient's breast. The FFBU system uses a commercially available FDA 510K approved ultrasound system to acquire and process B-Mode grayscale images of a patient's breast.
- Similar to the Sofia™ (ATUS), the U-Systems ABUS system uses an automated . linear transducer to acquire serial 2D images of the entire patient's breast. The ABUS system uses a commercially available FDA 510K approved ultrasound system to acquire and process B-Mode grayscale images of a patient's breast.
#### Differences
- . The Sofia™ (ATUS) system uses an FDA 510K approved linear transducer manufactured by GE Medical Systems. The U-Systems ABUS device uses a custom automated linear transducer. The transducers listed above are all broad band transducers with frequency ranges between 7MHZ and 11MHZ.
- t The Sofia™ (ATUS) system positions the patient in a prone position lying on its examination table with the breast in a pendulous position within the pyramid shaped dome. The U-Systems ABUS and FFBU devices position the patient in a supine position and use the transducer housing of its devise to compress the breast tissue between the transducer face and the thoracic wall.
- . iVu's pendulous position of the breast in a fluid environment eliminates the need for breast compression. No new issues of safety or efficacy are created.
### 6. Summary of Studies
The function and performance of the Sofia™ (ATUS) system have been evaluated through non-clinical design verification and validation tests. Testing included mechanical performance evaluations and simulated use tests. The results of the Sofia™ (ATUS) systems performance evaluations demonstrate that the Sofia™ (ATUS) device design is well suited for its intended use.
iVu Imaging completed mechanical performance evaluations to verify that the Sofia™ (ATUS) system meets predetermined specifications, conforms to product performance requirements, and supports the compatibility of internal components. Test results, as documented in Section 7, support that the Sofia™ (ATUS) system meets the predetermined specifications and performance requirements for its intended use.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Additional testing of The Sofia™ (ATUS) device will be performed by an independent testing laboratory (Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc) and must demonstrate conformance with the IEC 60601 series of electrical and electromagnetic safety standards before commercial distribution begins. In Section 7 of this document, under "ELECTRICAL SAFETY TESTING" is a signed certification by the President of iVu attesting to the fact that such testing will occur prior to commercialization. The following specific standards will be tested.
| Document<br>Number | Description |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| IEC 60601-1 | IEC 60601-1 Issue 1988/12/01 Ed:2 Medical Electrical Equipment<br>Part 1: General Requirements for Safety; (Amd. 1-1991)<br>(CENELEC EN 60601-1: 1990) (Amd. 2-1995) (Corrigendum-1995) |
| UL 60601-1 | UL 60601-1 UL Standard for Safety Medical Electrical Equipment,<br>Part 1: General Requirements for Safety Issued: 4/25/2003 Ed: 1 |
| CAN/CSA-C22.2 No.<br>601.1-M90 | CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 601.1-M90 Canadian Electrical Code, Part I.<br>Rev. 1999 |
| IEC 60601-1-2 | IEC 60601-1-2 Issued: 2001/09/30 Ed:2 Medical Electrical<br>Equipment Part 1-2: General Requirements for Safety -<br>Collateral Standard: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Req. and<br>Tests |
In Section 7, Bench testing included testing performed in-house, as well as, an opinion from an expert in the field of acoustic sonography who also performed and documented acoustical output testing. In-house testing, the opinion, and acoustic testing demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Sofia (ATUS) system.
## 7. Conclusion (statement of equivalence)
The data and information provided in this submission supports a substantial equivalence determination, and, therefore, 510(k) premarket notification clearance of the Sofia™ (ATUS) Device.
{4}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized image of an eagle with three stripes on its body. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUN - 3 2008
iVu Imaging Corportaion % Mr. Daniel W. Lehtonen Sr. Staff Engineer - Medical Devices Intertek Testing Services 2307 E. Aurora Rd., Unit B7 TWINSBURG OF 44087
Rc: K080555
Trade/Device Name: Sofia™ Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (ATUS) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.1560 Regulation Name: Ultrasonic pulsed echo imaging system Regulatory Class: II Product Code: ITX and IYO Dated: May 16, 2008 Received: May 19, 2008
Dear Mr. Lehtonen:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
This determination of substantial equivalence applies to the following transducers intended for use with the Sofia™ Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (ATUS), as described in your premarket notification:
#### Transducer Model Number
## 12L-RS
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA 's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Lehtonen
systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus permits your device to market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain
other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html
If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact Paul Hardy at (240) 276-3666.
Sincerely yours,
Vogue McHanz
Sm Nancy C. Brogdon Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure(s)
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use Statement
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number: K080255
Sofia™ Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (ATUS) Device Name:
Indications for use:
The Sofia™ (ATUS) device is indicated for use as a B-mode ultrasonic imaging system for imaging of a patient's breast when used with an automatic scanning linear array transducer. The device is not intended to be used as a replacement for screening mammography.
Prescription Use X (Per 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Aomi M Whang
(Division Sign-Off)
D sion of Reproductive, Abdominal a F -diological Devices ! (U(k) Number
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Diagnostic Ultrasound Indications for Use Form
## 510(K) Number: K080555
Device Name: Sofia ™ Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (ATUS) device Ultrasound probe - GE 12L-RS
Intended Use: Diagnostic ultrasound imaging or fluid flow analysis of the human body as follows
| | Mode of Operation | | | | | | | | | | |
|---------------------------------|-------------------|---|---|-----|-----|------------------|----------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------|--|
| Clinical Application | A | B | M | PWD | CWD | Color<br>Doppler | Amplitude<br>Doppler | Color<br>Velocity<br>Imaging | Combined<br>(Specify) | Other<br>(specify) | |
| Ophthalmic | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fetal | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Abdominal | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Intraoperative (specify) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Intraoperative<br>Neurological | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pediatric | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Small Organ (Breast) | | P | | | | | | | | | |
| Neonatal Cephalic | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adult Cephalic | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cardiac | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transesophageal | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transrectal | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transvaginal | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transurethral | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Intravascular | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Peripheral Vascular | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Laparoscopic | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Musculoskeletal<br>Conventional | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Musculo-skeletal<br>Superficial | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other (specify) | | | | | | | | | | | |
N=New indication: P=Previously Cleared by FDA; E= Added Under Appendix E
Additional Comments: The iVu Imaging Sofia™ Automated Tomographic Ultrasound (ATUS) device is intended for ultrasonic breast examinations.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
lone In Whay
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Reproductive, Abdominal ar Radiological Dev 510(k) Number
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.