K071340 · Thermofisher Scientific OY · KHS · Oct 5, 2007 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K071340
Device Name
CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2), SCAL, NORTROL AND ABTROL
Applicant
Thermofisher Scientific OY
Product Code
KHS · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 5, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1160
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Carbon dioxide (CO₂) reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total carbon dioxide in human serum and plasma (Li-heparin) on T60 analyzer. Bicarbonate measurements, in conjunction with tests such as glucose, urea, sodium, potassium, and chloride, are used in the assessment of disturbances of acid base balance resulting from metabolic or respiratory causes. sCal For in vitro diagnostic use on T60 analyzer. sCal is used as a multicalibrator for quantitative measurements using methods defined by Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy. Nortrol For in vitro diagnostic use for quantitative testing on T60 analyzer. Nortrol is a control serum to monitor trueness and precision of the analytes listed in the separate Nortrol value sheet. The given values are valid for T60 Clinical Chemistry Analyzers using methods defined by Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy. Abtrol For in vitro diagnostic use for quantitative testing on T60 analyzer. Abtrol is a control serum to monitor trueness and precision of the analytes listed in the separate Abtrol value sheet. The given values are valid for T60 Clinical Chemistry Analyzers using methods defined by Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy.
Device Story
Liquid, ready-to-use enzymatic reagent kit for quantitative CO2 determination; utilizes phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase methodology. Input: human serum or plasma samples. Process: bicarbonate ions react with PEP via PEPC to form oxaloacetate; malate dehydrogenase reduces oxaloacetate to malate, oxidizing NADH to NAD+. Output: spectrophotometric absorbance decrease at 380nm, proportional to CO2 concentration. Used in clinical chemistry laboratories on T60 analyzer; operated by trained laboratory personnel. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing and monitoring acid-base imbalances. Benefits include rapid, automated quantitative assessment of metabolic/respiratory status.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated over 20 days (40 runs) using three reagent lots and three control levels; CVs ranged from 1.0% to 5.3%. Linearity established from 5.0–40.0 mmol/L. Method comparison with predicate (n=100 samples) showed correlation coefficients of 0.9825 (total) and Deming regression Y = 0.978X + 1.23. No clinical data.
Technological Characteristics
Liquid, ready-to-use enzymatic assay. Reagents: PEP (8.0 mM/L), NADH (1.6 mM/L), PEPC (>1000 U/L), MDH (>200 U/L), buffer (66 mmol/L), NaN3, stabilizers. Sensing principle: spectrophotometric absorbance at 380nm. Designed for T60 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer. Calibrators and controls are human-derived, tested negative for HIV-1/2, HBsAg, and HCV.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of total CO2 in human serum/plasma (Li-heparin) to assess acid-base balance disturbances (metabolic/respiratory) in conjunction with other electrolytes/metabolites.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bicarbonate/carbon dioxide test system is a device intended to measure bicarbonate/carbon dioxide in plasma, serum, and whole blood. Bicarbonate/carbon dioxide measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous potentially serious disorders associated with changes in body acid-base balance.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k071340
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Carbon Dioxide
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative enzymatic assay
E. Applicant:
Thermo Fisher Scientific
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
sCal, code 981831
Nortrol, code 981043
Abtrol, code 981044
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Enzymatic, Carbon Dioxide (KHS) | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1160
Bicarbonate/carbon dioxide test system | 75 Clinical Chemistry(CH) |
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| Calibrator, Multi-Analyte Mixture (JIX) | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1150
Calibrator | 75 Clinical Chemistry(CH) |
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| Control (JJY) | Class I reserved | 21 CFR§ 862.1660
Quality control material (assayed and unassayed) | 75 Clinical Chemistry(CH) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below.
{1}
2
2. **Indication(s) for use:**
**Carbon dioxide (CO₂)**
Carbon dioxide (CO₂) reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total carbon dioxide in human serum and plasma (Li-heparin) on T60 analyzer. Bicarbonate measurements, in conjunction with tests such as glucose, urea, sodium, potassium, and chloride, are used in the assessment of disturbances of acid base balance resulting from metabolic or respiratory causes.
**sCal**
For in vitro diagnostic use on T60 analyzer. sCal is used as a multicalibrator for quantitative measurements using methods defined by Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy.
**Nortrol**
For in vitro diagnostic use for quantitative testing on T60 analyzer. Nortrol is a control serum to monitor trueness and precision of the analytes listed in the separate Nortrol value sheet. The given values are valid for T60 Clinical Chemistry Analyzers using methods defined by Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy.
**Abtrol**
For in vitro diagnostic use for quantitative testing on T60 analyzer. Abtrol is a control serum to monitor trueness and precision of the analytes listed in the separate Abtrol value sheet. The given values are valid for T60 Clinical Chemistry Analyzers using methods defined by Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy.
3. **Special conditions for use statement(s):**
For Prescription use only
4. **Special instrument requirements:**
To be used with T60 Chemistry Analyzer.
**I. Device Description:**
The carbon dioxide reagent is supplied as a liquid, ready-to-use, single reagent kit. It contains Phosphoenolpyruvate 8.0 mM/L, NADH 1.6 mM/L, Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) (Microbial) >1000 U/L, Malate Dehydrogenase (microbial) >200 U/L, Buffer (66 mmol/L), NaN₃, pH 8.05 at 20°C, and stabilizers.
All human materials included in the calibrators and controls were tested by FDA approved methods and found to be negative for the presence of antibodies to HIV-1, HIV-2, HBsAg, and HCV.
**J. Substantial Equivalence Information:**
1. **Predicate device name(s):**
Roche Diagnostics/Hitachi Bicarbonate Liquid
2. **Predicate 510(k) number(s):**
k032377
{2}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Characteristics | Carbon Dioxide (CO2) | Roche Diagnostics/Hitachi Bicarbonate Liquid |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Indications for Use | Carbon dioxide (CO2) reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total carbon dioxide in human serum. Bicarbonate measurements, in conjunction with tests such as glucose, urea, sodium, potassium, and chloride, are used in the assessment of disturbances of acid base balance resulting from metabolic or respiratory causes. | In vitro test for the quantitative determination of bicarbonate in human serum and plasma on Roche automated clinical chemistry analyzers. |
| Assay protocol | Enzymatic rate | Enzymatic rate |
| Sample type | Serum, plasma (Li-heparin) | Serum, plasma (Li-heparin) |
| Reagent | PEP 8.0 mM, NADH (1.6 mmol/L), MDH (microbial) > 200U/L, PEPC (microbial) ≥ 1000U/L, Buffer (66 mmol/L), NaN3, pH 8.05 at 20°C, stabilizers. | PEP > 60 mmol/L, NADH analog (3 mmol/L), MDH (porcine) > 20000 U/L, PEPC (microbial) > 2000 U/L, buffer, stabilizer, preservative. |
| Format | Reagent provided as a ready to use liquid. | Reagent is provided in a ready to use format. |
| Storage/Stability | Reagent in unopened vial is stable at 2-8°C until expiration date indicated on vial label. | Shelf life at 2-8°C until the expiration date on the label. |
| Expected Values | 22 – 29 mmol/L | 22 – 29 mmol/L |
| Linearity / Assay range | 5.0 – 40.0 mmol/L | 1.5 – 50.0 mmol/L |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices; Approved Guideline. Vol. 19 No.2. February 1999.
CLSI EP9-A: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline. Vol. 15 No. 17. December 1995.
L. Test Principle:
Carbon Dioxide Reagent is a quantitative enzymatic assay based on the PEP Carboxylase methodology. Carbon Dioxide (in the form of bicarbonate ions) reacts with phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), in the presence of phosphoenolpyruvate
{3}
carboxylase (PEPC) to form oxaloacetate. Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) catalyzes the reduction of oxalacetate to malate with the concomitant oxidation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) to $\mathrm{NAD+}$ . Spectrophotometric determination of the decrease in absorbance monitored at $380\mathrm{nm}$ is proportional to the amount of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ in the sample.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The precision was evaluated using three lots of reagents and three levels of quality control serum containing normal and abnormal levels of $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ on the T60 analyzer. Studies were carried out in duplicate in two runs per day over 20 days (40 runs). The results are tabulated below.
Within-day Precision
| Description | Control Level 1 | Control Level 2 | Control Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot No. 1 | | | |
| Number of data points | | | |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 15.6 | 25.3 | 34.6 |
| SD (mmol/L) | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| CV (%) | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| Lot No. 2 | | | |
| Number of data points | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 15.7 | 25.2 | 34.3 |
| SD (mmol/L) | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| CV (%) | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Lot No. 3 | | | |
| Number of data points | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 15.5 | 25.1 | 34.1 |
| SD (mmol/L) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| CV (%) | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Between Run Precision
| Description | Control Level 1 | Control Level 2 | Control Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lot No. 1 | | | |
| Number of data points | - | - | - |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 15.6 | 25.3 | 34.6 |
| SD (mmol/L) | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| CV (%) | 4.4 | 4.3 | 3.6 |
{4}
| Lot No. 2 | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Number of data points | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 15.7 | 25.2 | 34.3 |
| SD (mmol/L) | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| CV (%) | 5.3 | 3.9 | 4.5 |
| Lot No. 3 | | | |
| Number of data points | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Mean (mmol/L) | 15.5 | 25.1 | 34.1 |
| SD (mmol/L) | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| CV (%) | 4.2 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
To determine the linearity range, the sponsor prepared ten $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ test samples through serial dilution of a $60\mathrm{mmol / L}$ bicarbonate standard made by dissolving $0.252\mathrm{g}$ of Sodium Bicarbonate in $50~\mathrm{mL}$ deionized water. Test samples concentrations ranged from 4.67 - 44 mmol/L. All ten $\mathrm{CO}_{2}$ levels were run in duplicate on T60 analyzer. The sponsor's acceptance criteria are based on measurement values between 15-50 mmol/L with $\%$ recovery being within $95 - 105\%$ of the assigned values, and below 15 mmol/L, $\pm 2\mathrm{mmol / L}$ from the assigned value. For the range tested, the linear regression analysis demonstrated a linear regression equation, $\mathrm{Y} = 1.029\mathrm{X} - 0.564$ . The assay range claimed by the sponsor is $5.0 - 40\mathrm{mmol / L}$ . The sponsor also conducted studies to show the linearity of the reagent maintained through out the claimed shelf life of one year using a reagent lot at the completion of one year storage at $2 - 8^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . The linear regression analysis demonstrated equation, $\mathrm{Y} = 1.025\mathrm{X} - 0.127$ . Using the same acceptance criteria, the sponsor claimed the linear range of $5 - 40\mathrm{mmol / L}$ .
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): The sponsor's protocols indicate that each calibrator (sCal), and control (Nortrol and Abtrol) lot is traceable to the manufacturer's primary reference material. The values are assigned based on multi determinations performed using T60 instruments. The assigned value is the median of all the values generated for each calibrator and control. Additionally, control range is calculated as the target value $\pm 2$ standard deviations. The value assignment sheet lists the lot-specific values.
In the labeling the sponsor recommends calibrating the test at least every three days and every time a new reagent bottle is used. The sponsor also recommends using quality control samples at least once a day, after each calibration and when a new bottle is used. However, the sponsor also suggests the control intervals must be adapted to the individual laboratory requirement.
The sponsor claims that all open on-board reagents are stable for 5 days. Based on the stability studies conducted, the sponsor claimed open vial
{5}
stability at 2 - 8°C is 7 days and shelf life (unopened) stability at 2 - 8°C is 4 years for calibrators and 3 years for controls.
d. Limit of Blank (LOB):
To demonstrate the limit of the blank, a serum matrix equivalent solution, Serasub, containing no CO₂ (blank sample) was tested in eleven replicates. The sponsor defined the limit of zero-concentration (LOB) sample as ±3SD, which was demonstrated to be 0.7467 mmol/L and 0.5022 mmol/L for Serasub aged 2 months and 12 months, respectively. Along with the results from linearity studies and LOB determined here, the sponsor established the assay range of 5.0 – 40 mmol/L.
e. Analytical specificity:
The sponsor evaluated the effect of some known endogenous and exogenous interferents by spiking those substances in an aliquot of normal sera and comparing with an unspiked aliquot of the same sample. The interferents and the test range included hemoglobin (0 – 1000 mg/dL), lipemia (0 – 2000 mg/dL), unconjugated bilirubin (0 – 60 mg/dL), and conjugated bilirubin (0-60 mg/dL). Based on the sponsor’s defined acceptance criteria on interference limit of ±10% of control, the results indicate that there are no interferences up to the concentrations tested for any of the substances. The sponsor also conducted CO₂ reagent assay interference by sample hemolysate (0 – 1040 mg/dL) and based on the same acceptance criteria confirmed that there is no interference up to 400 mg/dL.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Performance of the Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) Reagent assayed on the T60 analyzer was compared with the results generated for the predicate device, Roche CO₂-L, Bicarbonate Liquid (k032377) using 100 samples. The samples consisted of 71 serum (range: 9.1 – 49.5 mmol/L) and 29 Li-heparin plasma (range: 11.4 – 45.2 mmol/L). Comparison of the data based on two methods for serum, plasma and samples as a total gave correlation coefficients of 0.9835, 0.9816, and 0.9825, respectively. Deming regression analysis for serum, plasma and samples as a total resulted in the following equations, Y = 0.972X + 1.4; Y = 1.046X - 0.24; and Y = 0.978X + 1.23, respectively.
b. Matrix comparison:
The sponsor conducted independent studies using serum and plasma to demonstrate that the performance of the Carbon Dioxide Reagent is substantially equivalent to the predicate, as described above.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable.
{6}
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range*:
The expected values of CO₂ given for adult (22 – 29 mmol/L) were based on literature. The sponsor recommends in the labeling that each laboratory determine its own reference range.
* Burtis, CA and Ashwood, ER (ed.), Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 5th edition, WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 2001, p. 732, 966.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.