K070841 · Southern Implants, Inc. · DZE · Jun 21, 2007 · Dental
Device Facts
Record ID
K070841
Device Name
ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM
Applicant
Southern Implants, Inc.
Product Code
DZE · Dental
Decision Date
Jun 21, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 872.3640
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The NSI Implant System is intended to be implanted in the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for fixed or removable dental prostheses in a single tooth, partially edentulous prostheses, or full arch prostheses. It further adds the option for immediate loading on single and splinted multiple unit restorations when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, to restore chewing function.
Device Story
NSI Endosseous Dental Implant System consists of screw-type implants and abutments; implanted into upper or lower jaw arches by dental professionals to support fixed or removable dental prostheses. System provides foundation for single tooth, partially edentulous, or full arch restorations; enables immediate loading when primary stability and occlusal conditions are met. Implants manufactured from ASTM F67-95 Grade III or IV Titanium; surface enhanced via alumina particle blasting. Device restores patient chewing function. Clinical use involves surgical placement in dental clinic setting. Safety validated through fatigue testing per FDA Class II Special Controls guidance; sterilization via Co60 irradiation.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies were conducted or deemed necessary for this submission. Evidence is based on bench testing, specifically fatigue testing conducted in accordance with the FDA Class II Special Controls Guidance Document for Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Abutments.
Technological Characteristics
Screw-type endosseous dental implants and abutments. Material: ASTM F67-95 Grade III or IV Titanium. Surface modification: Alumina (Al2O3) particle blasting. Sterilization: Co60 irradiation (min 25.0 kGy) per ISO 11737, ISO 13409. Packaging validated per ASTM D 4169-04, ASTM F 88-00, ASTM F 1929-98, and ISO 11607.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring dental prostheses support in upper or lower jaw arches, including single tooth, partially edentulous, or full arch cases. Allows for immediate loading on single and splinted multiple unit restorations given good primary stability and appropriate occlusal loading.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K070841
172
## 510(K) PREMARKET NOTIFICATION SUMMARY
Name/Address of Submitter: Southern Implants, Inc. 10355 B Democracy Lane Fairfax, VA 22030
JUN 2 1 2007
Establishment Registration Number: 3003845138
Contact Person: Greta M. Hols Phone: (703) 278-3953 Fax: (703) 278-3954
Date Summary Prepared: March 16, 2007
Device Classification Name: Endosseous Implant and Accessories
Device Classification Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3640 and 21 CFR 872.3630
Device Regulatory Status: Class II Special Controls
Trade Name: Endosseous Dental Implant
Purpose: The purpose of this 510(k) is to include additional implants and accessories in the NSI Endosseous Implant System that did not fall within the size range and design shapes identified in prior 510(k) submissions.
Performance Standards: FDA has not established a performance standard applicable to endosseous implants and their accessories. The materials in the NSI Implant System meet applicable voluntary standards. Northern Implant's screw-type implants and abutments are manufactured from ASTM F67-95 Grade III or Grade IV Titanium.
| Predicate Devices: | K003620 NSI Hexed and Non-Hexed Implant System |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| | K020617 NSI Hexed and Non-Hexed Implant System |
| | K033171 NSI Hexed and Non-Hexed Implant System |
| | K052490 NSI Hexed and Non-Hexed Implant System |
| | K053478 NSI Hexed and Non-Hexed Implant System |
| | K061169 NSI Hexed and Non-Hexed Implant System |
Device Description and Intended Use: The NSI Implant System is intended to be implanted in the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for fixed or removable dental prostheses in a single tooth, partially edentulous prostheses, or full arch prostheses. It further adds the option for immediate loading on single and splinted multiple unit restorations when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, to restore chewing function.
The 4.0 co-axis implant is not intended, nor should it be used, in conjunction with an angled abutment.
Sterilization Methods Used: Sterilization of these implants will be achieved using Co60 irradiation, with a minimum dose of 25.0 kGy (2.5 m rads), creating a Sterility Assurance Level of 10th . Validation of sterilization will be done as specified by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). Standards utilized include:
| ISO 11737 | Sterilization of Health Care Products – Requirements for validation and routine control –<br>Radiation sterilization |
|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ISO 11737-2 | Sterilization of Medical Devices – Microbial Methods – Part 2: Tests of sterility<br>performed in the validation of a sterilization process |
| ISO 13409 | Sterilization of Health Care Products – Radiation Sterilization – substantiation of 25kGy as |
Page 5 of 33
{1}------------------------------------------------
K070841
2fz
#### a sterilization dose for small or infrequent production batches.
#### Packaging Validation:
All Southern Implants packaging is validated following these standards:
| ♣ ASTM D 4169-04 | Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ♦ ASTM F 88-00 | Standard Test Method for Seal strength of Flexible Barrier Materials |
| • ASTM F 1929-98 | Standard Test Method for Detecting Seal Leaks in Porous Medical Packaging by<br>Dye Penetration |
| EN 552 | Sterilization of medical devise - Validation and routine control of sterilization by<br>irradiation |
| EN556-1:1997 | Sterilization of medical devices - Requirements for medical devices to be labeled<br>"Sterile" |
| EN 868-1:1997 | Packaging materials and systems for medical devices with are to be sterilized:<br>Part 1 General requirements and test methods |
| EN 868-5:1999 | Packaging materials and systems for medical devices which are to be sterilized –<br>Part 5: Heat and self-sealable pouches and reels of paper and plastic film<br>construction - Requirements and test methods |
| EN 868-9: 2000 | Packaging materials and systems for medical devices which are to be sterilized –<br>Part 9: Uncoated non-woven materials of polyolefines suitable for use as<br>packaging of medical devices which are to be terminally sterilized –<br>Requirements and test methods. |
| EN 868-10:2000 | Packaging materials and systems for medical devices which are to be sterilized –<br>Part 10: Adhesive coated nonwoven material of polyolefines for use in the<br>manufacture of heat sealable pouches, reels and lids - Requirements and test<br>methods |
| ♦ ISO 11607 | Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices |
Technological Characteristics: The physical properties and designs of the additional implants and accessories in the NSI Endosseous Dental Implant System were compared with legally marketed predicate devices. The technological characteristics were comparable.
Surface Modifications: The surface of our implant is blasted using 100 micron alumina (AI2O3) particles. Alumina is a highly biocompatible material and hence if any particles remain embedded in the surface, they will not pose a complication. The other measure taken to reduce the potential of embeddiment is to blast with relatively low pressure. If the indentations caused are significantly smaller than the size of the blast media, then particles tend to not adhere to the surface. (Our S, = 1.43 microns is a fraction of the particle size of 110 microns).Each and every implant is visually inspected under a microscope after surface enhancement as a matter of manufacturing protocol. In addition to visual inspection, a sample implant is sent for SEM testing four times a year for evaluation of the surface as well.
Brief Discussion of Clinical Studies: Clinical studies were not conducted, or deemed necessary, for the purpose of this 510(k) submission.
Brief Discussion of Engineering Studies: Fatigue Testing was conducted per FDA Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Abutments that was issued on May 12, 2004. Modification to the testing protocol was discussed with the FDA prior to conducting the test (Enclosure 8 Appendix B). Testing revealed a stable screw joint at the highest forces tested (Enclosure 8).
Conclusions Drawn: The NSI Endosseous Dental Implant System has the same intended use as, and technological characteristics similar to, the legally marketed predicate devices. Any differences in the technological characteristics did not raise new issues of safety or effectiveness.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular and contains the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. In the center of the seal is an abstract image of an eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Greta M. Hols Southern Implants, Incorporated 10355 B Democracy Lane Fairfax, Virginia 22030
JUN 2 1 2007
Re: K070841
Trade/Device Name: Endosseous Dental Implant System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3640 Regulation Name: Endosseous Dental Implant Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DZE Dated: May 18, 2007 Received: May 21, 2007
Dear Ms. Hols:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Page 2 -- Ms. Hols
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Chiu Lin, Ph.D.
Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
### Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
K070841
INDICATION FOR USE
510(k) Number:
Device Name: Endosseous Dental Implant System
Indication for Use: The NSI Implant System is intended to be implanted in the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for fixed or removable dental prostheses in a single tooth, partially edentulous prostheses, or full arch prostheses. It further adds the option for immediate loading on single and splinted multiple unit restorations when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, to restore chewing function.
# CONCURRENCE OF CDRH OFFICE OF DEVICE EVALUATION
OR
Prescription Use
Over-the-counter Use _
(Per 21 CFR801.109)
Susan Runne
510(k) Number: k070441
Page 3 of 33
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.