K070731 · Plus Orthopedics AG · HAW · Jul 31, 2007 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K070731
Device Name
PIGALILEO TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT (THR) SYSTEM
Applicant
Plus Orthopedics AG
Product Code
HAW · Neurology
Decision Date
Jul 31, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.4560
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System is intended to be used in computer assisted orthopedic surgery to aid the surgeon with bone cuts and implant positioning during joint replacement. It provides information to the surgeon that is utilized to place surgical instruments during surgery utilizing anatomical landmarks and other data specifically obtained intra-operatively (e.g. hip center, pelvic plane etc.). Examples of some surgical procedures include but are not limited to: Primary total hip replacement Revision hip surgery Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty
Device Story
PiGalileo™ THR System is a software-controlled electromechanical stereotaxic device for computer-aided orthopedic surgery. System uses infrared (IF) camera and passive markers on surgical instruments to track position in real-time. Intra-operative anatomical landmarks (e.g., spinae, symphysis, femur) are scanned via probe to calculate hip cup and stem alignment. System cart houses CPU, monitor, user interface, and IF camera. Surgeon operates system in OR to receive real-time guidance on bone cuts and implant positioning. Output provides visual data on screen to assist surgeon in placing instruments; surgeon maintains control and can revert to conventional techniques. Benefits include improved precision in implant alignment during hip arthroplasty.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Design verification and validation were performed in accordance with 21 CFR 820.30. No clinical data was provided. Compliance with IEC 60601-1 (electrical safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC), and ISO 14971 (risk management) was demonstrated.
Technological Characteristics
Stereotaxic navigation system using infrared (IF) camera and passive markers. System components: CPU, monitor, keyboard/touchpad, IF camera, and surgical instruments. Software-controlled electromechanical device. Connectivity: Standalone system cart. Sterilization: Cleaning/disinfection/sterilization per AAMI TIR 12-1994, ISO 17664, and ISO 11134. Biocompatibility per ASTM/ISO standards for invasive devices.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing orthopedic joint replacement surgery, including primary total hip replacement, revision hip surgery, and minimally invasive hip arthroplasty, requiring computer-assisted guidance for bone cuts and implant positioning.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A stereotaxic instrument is a device consisting of a rigid frame with a calibrated guide mechanism for precisely positioning probes or other devices within a patient's brain, spinal cord, or other part of the nervous system.
PiGalileo™ Total Knee Replacement (TKR) System (K061362)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# |070731
JUL 3 1 2007
# Attachment B - Revised Premarket Notification 510(k) Summary
:
Attachment B July 26, 2007
Company Confidential
.
{1}------------------------------------------------
# K070731
# Premarket Notification 510(k) Summary
#### 1. Submitter Information
Company Name and Address:
PLUS ORTHOPEDICS AG Erlenstraße 4a CH-6343 Rotkreuz Switzerland
Contact Name:
Pamela J. Weagraff, Principal Consultant Quintiles Consulting 18 Bridie Lane Norfolk, MA 02056
Telephone:508-528-1745 Facsimile: 978-752-1225 E-mail: pamela.weagraff@quintiles.com
Date Prepared: July 26, 2007
#### 2. Name of Device
- Trade Name: PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System (a)
- (b) Common Name: Navigation System
- (c) Classification Name and Reference:
Title 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), Part 882.4560 Stereotaxic instrument, Product Code: HAW
# 3. Substantial Equivalence Claimed to Predicate Device
VectorVision Hip, K060468, manufactured by BrainLAB AG Orthopilot® 2 THA V 2.0, K050752, manufactured by Aescular®, Inc. Stryker Navigation System, K022365, manufactured by Stryker Corporation PiGalileo™ Total Knee Replacement (TKR) System, K061362, manufactured by Plus Orthopedics AG
{2}------------------------------------------------
### 4. Device Description
The PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) software application when provided with the PiGalileo™ system cart results in the PiGalileo™ THR System, a softwarecontrolled electromechanical stereotaxic device for computer-aided navigation of PiGalileo™ surgical instruments with the purpose of assisting the surgeon in optimally positioning hip prostheses. Refer to Section 11.0 for an in depth description of the PiGalileo™ THR System.
The PiGalileo™ THR System is intended to be used in computer-assisted orthopedic surgery to aid the surgeon with bone cuts and implant positioning during joint replacement. It provides information to the surgeon that is utilized to place surgical instruments during surgery utilizing anatomical landmarks and other data specifically obtained intra-operatively.
The PiGalileo™ THR System is based on common stereotaxic technology in which Infrared (IF) LED (light emitting diodes) or passive markers on the surgical instruments allow the instruments to be tracked in real time in the surgical field.
In the case of PiGalileo™ THR System, patient data that is required to navigate the surgical instruments is collected during the procedure. The system utilizes this data to establish a connection between passive locaters, i.e., Infrared (IF) light, and the system's IF camera as previously described tracks the surgical instruments in real time in the surgical field.
The precision of navigation-assisted surgery depends on accurate scanning of skeletal landmarks. Scanned morphological data represents the basis for calculating the position of the hip cup and hip stem. Scanned points must represent unique anatomic landmarks so that they can be located in a safe and reproducible manner throughout surgery. For cup navigation, the spinae, left/ right are scanned as well as the symphysis. Each point is scanned three times to enhance precision and used for inclination and anteversion alignment. For stem navigation, the sagital plane is determined from the tibialis anterior and the intersection point on the femur. The position and alignment of the proximal stem axis are determined with a probe which provides the basis of the varus/valgus alignment.
The surgeon maintains control of the operation and any decisions required with regard to the surgery at all times. Risk mitigations implemented under Design Controls ensure that sufficient fail safe mechanisms allow the surgeon to convert to non-navigated conventional surgical techniques at any time.
The navigation platform for the PiGalileo™ THR System is the same as the navigation platform cleared under PiGalileo™ TKR System, K061362, and includes the following elements:
{3}------------------------------------------------
- (a) System Cart housing the following items; there are no changes to the system cart as compared to K061362.
- 1 System electronics such as CPU and connection box
- 트 Monitor
- I User Interface consisting of keyboard, touch pad and hard controls, e.g., "ON / OFF", footswitch
- Infrared (IF) Camera and Camera Stand/Tripod
- l Optional printer
- . System cabling
- (b) PiGalileo™ THR Software refers to the PiGalileo™ System Software and the THR software application:
- . PiGalileo™ System Software: this software is the same as that of the PiGalileo™ TKR System; there are no changes to either the system software or the calculations or the landmark technique as compared to K061362.
- 지 PiGalileo™ THR software application consists of two applets, PiGalileo™ Hip Cup and PiGalileo™ Hip Stem. Each applet consists of a collection of software modules that support the surgeon in hip cup and hip stem replacement. Each module is designed specifically for an implant in which the software calculates the values provided on screen differently for each implant, the specific implant geometry and the implant specific instruments.
- (c) Surgical Instruments: include universal instruments such as hemispheres, and various locators; navigated instruments are equipped with markers that are tracked by the stereotaxic camera.
The POLARCUP® Dual Mobility System consists of two components: a thin press fit shell and a liner component.
## 5. Intended Use / Indication for Use
The PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System is intended to be used in computer assisted orthopedic surgery to aid the surgeon with bone cuts and implant positioning during joint replacement. It provides information to the surgeon that is utilized to place surgical instruments during surgery utilizing anatomical landmarks and other data specifically obtained intra-operatively (e.g. hip center, pelvic plane etc.).
Examples of some surgical procedures include but are not limited to: Primary total hip replacement Revision hip surgery Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty
{4}------------------------------------------------
# 6. Predicate Device Comparison of Indications for Use / Intended Use and Technical Characteristics
The comparison of the PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System to the predicate devices was based on a review of the Design Control documentation, relevant aspects of which are included in the company's 510(k) Premarket Notification, and information concerning the predicate device, PiGalileo™ TKR System, K061362, that was available to the company internally, information concerning the predicate device that was obtained from the predicate device manufacturer's web site. The comparison considered technical characteristics and the indications for use / intended use.
# 7. Performance Data
- (a) Performance Standards (Section 514 Compliance): No performance standards applicable to this device, 882.4580, stereotaxic instrument, have been adopted under Section 514 of the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act.
- (b) PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System does conform to the following FDA recognized standards:
- Thermal, Electrical and Mechanical Safety i) IEC 60601-1: Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1: General Requirements for Safety
- ii) Electromagnetic Compatibility: IEC 60601-1-2:01: Electromagnetic Compatibility, Requirements and Tests, Emissions - Class A Limit, and Immunity IEC 61000-3-2:01: Electromagnetic Compatibility - Part 3-2 Limits for Harmonic Current Emissions IEC 61000-3-3:94+A1:01: Electromagnetic Compatibility -- Part 3-3 Limitation of Voltage Changes, Voltage Fluctuations
- iii) Software
IEC 60601-1-4:1996, Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-4: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Programmable electrical medical systems
FDA's "Reviewer Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submission for Software Contained in Medical Devices", May 11, 2005 FDA's "Guidance for Off-The-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices"
- iv) Sterilization
Cleaning, disinfection and sterilization testing was performed according to the following test protocols:
"Microbiological Efficiency Control of the Automated Cleaning and Disinfection Method", AAMI TIR 12-1994, ISO 17664, LM SOP 2-11-01
{5}------------------------------------------------
"Microbiological Efficiency Control of Steam Sterilization (Fractionated Vacuum Procedure)", AAMI TIR 12-1994, ISO 17664, (half-cycle method), AINSI/AAMI/ISO 11134, EN 556-1, AINSI/AAMI ST 67, LM P 2-11-04, LM SOP 2-11-04
- v) Risk Analysis: ISO 14971:2000, Application of risk management to medical devices.
- vi) Biocompatibility (Note: applies only to surgical tools, i.e., materials for system and THR software application do not come into contact with the patient.) ASTM/ISO standards, i.e., suitable for surgically invasive devices for transient to short term use.
- vii) General: FDA's "Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device", January 10, 1997 FDA's "Premarket Notification 510(k): Regulatory Requirements for Medical Devices", August, 1995 FDA's Updated 510(k) Sterility Review Guidance K90-1, August 30, 2002
- viii) Performance Testing: Design verification and design validation, e.g., bench testing was performed according to FDA's Design Control Requirements, Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 820.30.
#### 8. Conclusion:
The information and data provided in this 510(k) Premarket Notification establish that the PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System is substantially equivalent to the afore-mentioned predicate devices with respect to indications for use/intended use, and technical characteristics.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular border with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES-USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles a stylized caduceus or a representation of human figures.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
# JUL 3 1 2007
Plus Orthopedics AG % Ouintiles Consulting Pamela J. Weagraff, MBA, RAC Principal Consultant 18 Bridie Lane Norfolk, Massachusetts 02056
Re: K070731
Trade/Device Name: PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.4560 Regulation Name: Stereotaxic instrument Regulatory Class: II Product Code: HAW Dated: July 11, 2007 Received: July 16, 2007
Dear Ms. Weagraff:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{7}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Pamela J. Weagraff, MBA, RAC
forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Mark A. Millerson
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
## ODE Indications Statement
# 510(k) Number (if known): Unknown
### Device Name: PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System
#### Indications for Use:
The PiGalileo™ Total Hip Replacement (THR) System is intended to be used in computer assisted orthopedic surgery to aid the surgeon with bone cuts and implant positioning during joint replacement. It provides information to the surgeon that is utilized to place surgical instruments during surgery utilizing anatomical landmarks and other data specifically obtained intra-operatively (e.g. hip center, pelvic plane etc.).
Examples of some surgical procedures include but are not limited to: Primary total hip replacement Revision hip surgery Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty
Prescription Use: X (21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-the-Counter Use: (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
## (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Mark A. Milliken
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K070731
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.