UCP RAPID DRUG SCREENING TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANT, PROPOXYPHENE TESTS
K061457 · Ucp Biosciences, Inc. · LFG · Aug 21, 2006 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K061457
Device Name
UCP RAPID DRUG SCREENING TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANT, PROPOXYPHENE TESTS
Applicant
Ucp Biosciences, Inc.
Product Code
LFG · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Aug 21, 2006
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3910
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
UCP Rapid "" Drug Screening Tricyclic Antidepressant, Propoxyphene Test are rapid, qualitative, competitive binding immunoassays and intended for qualitatively the detection Tricyclic Antidepressant, Propoxyphene and their metabolites in human urine at the following cut-off concentrations: Tricyclic Antidepressant 1000 ng/mL Propoxyphene 300 ng/mL The tests provide only preliminary test results, which should be confirmed by other methods such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Clinical considerations and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary positive results are indicated. The tests are not intended to be used in monitoring the drugs levels.
Device Story
UCP Rapid Drug Screening tests are lateral flow immunochromatographic assays for qualitative detection of Tricyclic Antidepressants and Propoxyphene in human urine. Device utilizes competitive binding principle; drug in sample competes with drug conjugate for limited antibody binding sites. Visual output indicates presence or absence of drug at specified cut-off concentrations. Tests are performed without instrumentation; intended for professional use. Results are preliminary; clinical judgment and confirmatory testing (GC/MS) required for positive results. Benefits include rapid, point-of-care screening for drug presence.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical comparison study using 128 urine specimens per drug (64 positive, 64 negative). Specimens included 10% concentrations between -50% cutoff to cutoff and 10% between cutoff to +50% cutoff. Results compared against predicate devices and confirmed via HPLC or GC/MS. Performance demonstrated ≥ 98% agreement for all drugs. Additional bench testing included precision, sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, interference, and stability studies.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay; competitive binding format. Visual, qualitative end-result. No instrumentation required. Standalone test strips or devices. Evaluated for precision, sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, interference, and stability.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of Tricyclic Antidepressants and Propoxyphene and their metabolites in human urine at 1000 ng/mL and 300 ng/mL cut-offs, respectively. Intended for preliminary screening; results require confirmation by GC/MS. Not for monitoring drug levels.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tricyclic antidepressant drugs test system is a device intended to measure any of the tricyclic antidepressant drugs in serum. The tricyclic antidepressant drugs include imipramine, desipramine, amitriptyline, nortriptyline, protriptyline, and doxepin. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic depression to ensure appropriate therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A tricyclic antidepressant drugs test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
Predicate Devices
ACON TCA One Step Tricyclic Antidepressant Test Strip and Device (k021526)
Instant-View Propoxyphene Urine Test and Cassette (k022915)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k061457
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Tricyclic antidepressants in urine.
Propoxyphene in urine.
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative
E. Applicant:
UCP Biosciences Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
UCP Rapid™ Drug Screening Tricyclic Antidepressants Test
UCP Rapid™ Drug Screening Propoxyphene Test
G. Regulatory Information:
| Product Code | Classification | Regulation Section | Panel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LFG | II | 21 CFR 862.3910 | 91 (Tox) |
| JXN | II | 21 CFR 862.3700 | 91 (Tox) |
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The UCP Rapid™ Drug Screening Tricyclic Antidepressant Test and UCP
{1}
Rapid™ Drug Screening Propoxyphene Test are rapid, qualitative, competitive binding immunoassays for the detection of Tricyclic Antidepressants, Propoxyphene and their metabolites in human urine at the following cutoff levels:
| Test | Calibrator | Cut-off |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tricyclic Antidepressant | Nortriptyline | 1000 ng/mL |
| Propoxyphene | Propoxyphene | 300 ng/mL |
The tests provide only preliminary data, which should be confirmed by other methods such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The test configuration comes with either single drug test or in combination with multiple other drug tests. Clinical considerations and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test results, particularly when preliminary positive results are indicated. The tests are not intended to be used in monitoring drug levels.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not applicable (N/A)
I. Device Description:
The UCP™ Drug Screening Tricyclic Antidepressants and Propoxyphene test are both lateral flow chromatographic immunoassays that contain two test formats, a dipstick test strip and a cassette test card format. The dipstick test strip format is initiated by dipping the test strip into urine. The cassette test device uses the same principle however urine is added to a sample well of a cassette.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
ACON TCA One Step Tricyclic Antidepressant Test Strip and Device
Instant-View Propoxyphene Urine Test and Cassette.
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k021526 and k022915, respectively.
3. Comparison with predicate:
{2}
The device is similar to the predicates in that they measure the same analyte in the same matrix, have the same intended use, utilize the same test methodology and cutoff concentrations. There were no differences noted.
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None Referenced
## L. Test Principle:
The UCP Rapid Drug Screening Tricyclic Antidepressants and Propoxyphene Test Devices and Strips are one-step lateral flow immunoassays containing 1) a purple-colored conjugate pad with colloidal gold conjugated with anti-drug antibodies, 2) a nitrocellulose membrane with a test line (T line coated with the drug antigen) and a control line (C line coated with goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies). The test is a competitive binding immunoassay in which drugs and drug metabolites in a urine sample compete with immobilized drug conjugate for limited labeled antibody binding sites. The test devices are cassettes that allow for urine to be added and the urine migrates through the test device by capillary action. The test strips are dipped into urine specimens and the urine migrates through the test strip by capillary action.
If the drug or drug metabolite concentration in the specimen is below the cutoff level, the anti-drug antibodies in colloidal gold particles will bind to the drug antigens coated in the test line of the nitrocellulose membrane to form a T line, which indicates a negative result. If the concentration of drug in the urine specimen is at a cutoff level or higher, it will bind with antibodies conjugated with colloidal gold particles, so that no T line will develop in the test region, which indicates a positive result. The colloidal gold-antibody conjugate should bind to the C line and form a purple-colored and regardless of the presence of drug or drug metabolite in the urine specimen as long as a sufficient sample volume has been applied.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision was assessed for both TCA and Propoxyphene by conducting a within lot and a lot-to-lot precision study. The lot-to-lot precision study used drug free human urine spiked with commercially available drug standards that produced concentrations of -50% cutoff, -25% cutoff, the cutoff, +25% cutoff and +50% cutoff. The samples were tested with 3 lots of each assay device by three operators over a period of 10 days (N=60). Two operators are trained laboratory workers and one is professional with limited laboratory background. The results are presented in the charts below.
3
{3}
Tricyclic Antidepressants Inter Lot Reproducibility
| Concentration (ng/mL) | N | Lot #1 | | Lot #2 | | Lot #3 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision |
| 0 | 60 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 500 | 60 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 750 | 60 | 18/2 | 90% | 17/3 | 85% | 18/2 | 90% |
| 1000 | 60 | 1/19 | 95% | 1/19 | 95% | 0/20 | 100% |
| 1250 | 60 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
| 1500 | 60 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
Propoxyphene Inter Lot Reproducibility
| Concentration (ng/mL) | N | Lot #1 | | Lot #2 | | Lot #3 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision |
| 0 | 60 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 150 | 60 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 225 | 60 | 18/2 | 90% | 19/1 | 95% | 17/3 | 85% |
| 300 | 60 | 1/19 | 95% | 0/20 | 95% | 0/20 | 100% |
| 375 | 60 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
| 450 | 60 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
A within lot precision study was conducted for both drugs with drug free human urine spiked with commercially available drug standards that produced concentrations of -50% cutoff, -25% cutoff, the cutoff, +25% cutoff and +50% cutoff. Each specimen, at each concentration analyte, was tested four times daily for five consecutive days by the same three operators (same lot) at the sponsor's facility. The results are listed in the charts below.
Tricyclic Antidepressants within lot precision:
| Concentration (ng/mL) | N | Results #Neg/#Pos | Precision (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | 60 | 60/0 | 100% |
| 500 | 60 | 60/0 | 100% |
| 750 | 60 | 50/10 | 83% |
| 1000 | 60 | 3/57 | 95% |
| 1250 | 60 | 0/60 | 100% |
| 1500 | 60 | 0/60 | 100% |
{4}
Propoxyphene within precision study:
| Concentration (ng/mL) | N | Results #Neg/#Pos | Precision (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0 | 60 | 60/0 | 100% |
| 150 | 60 | 60/0 | 100% |
| 225 | 60 | 55/5 | 92% |
| 300 | 60 | 1/59 | 98% |
| 375 | 60 | 0/60 | 100% |
| 450 | 60 | 0/60 | 100% |
In order to show that both formats of the device (strips and cassette) are equivalent in readability, and additional bridging study was conducted. Normal drug free urine was spiked with commercially available drug standard to the same levels indicated in the charts above. Twenty UCP test strips and 20 UCP cassette devices from the same lots were tested and summarized in the charts below.
Tricyclic Antidepressants Test Bridging Study
| Concentration (ng/mL) | N | UCP Rapid TCA Strip | | UCP Rapid TCA Cassette | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision |
| 0 | 40 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 500 | 40 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 750 | 40 | 18/2 | 90% | 18/2 | 90% |
| 1000 | 40 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
| 1250 | 40 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
| 1500 | 40 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
Propoxyphene Test Bridging Study
| Concentration (ng/mL) | N | UCP Rapid PPX Strip | | UCP Rapid PPX Cassette | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision | Results # Neg/ Pos | Precision |
| 0 | 60 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 150 | 60 | 20/0 | 100% | 20/0 | 100% |
| 225 | 60 | 17/3 | 85% | 17/3 | 85% |
| 300 | 60 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 95% |
| 375 | 60 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
| 450 | 60 | 0/20 | 100% | 0/20 | 100% |
The results of the three precision studies show that there is no significant lot-to-lot or within lot variability. The bridging study also shows that the two formats (strip and cassette) are equivalent.
{5}
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable (N/A). This assay is intended for qualitative use.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
This device has internal process controls. A colored line appearing in the control region confirms that sufficient sample volume has been used. Users are informed not to interpret the test if a colored line failed to appear in the control region.
External controls are not supplied with this device.
d. Detection limit:
Sensitivity of the UCP Rapid Drug Screening Tests was characterized by validating the test performance around the claimed cutoff concentrations. The results support the sponsors chosen cutoffs of $1000\mathrm{ng / mL}$ for TCA and 300 for propoxyphene. See the Precision section above for additional information regarding test performance around the cutoff.
e. Analytical specificity:
Cross-reactivity was evaluated by spiking various concentrations of similarly structured drug compounds into drug-free urine/a negative control. The sponsored determined the concentration of the drug that produced a response approximately equivalent to the cutoff concentration of the assay (1000 ng/mL for TCA and 300 for propoxyphene). The cross-reactivity results are listed in the table below.
Tricyclic Antidepressants
| Compound | Response Equivalent to cutoff in ng/mL |
| --- | --- |
| Nortriptyline | 1,000 |
| Trimipramine | 4,500 |
| Amitriptyline | 1,000 |
| Promazine | 2,000 |
| Desipramine | 1,000 |
| Imipramine | 1,000 |
| Clomipramine | 18,000 |
| Doxepine | 1,000 |
| Maprotiline | 2,000 |
{6}
7
Propoxyphene
| Compound | Response equivalent to cutoff in ng/mL |
| --- | --- |
| Propoxyphene | 300 |
| Norpropoxyphene | 600 |
| Methadone | 100,000 |
| 2-ethyl,5-dimethyl-3,3,diphenylpryoline (EDDP) | 100,000 |
The sponsor tested many common substances and biological materials for interference with the UCP Rapid Drug Screening Tests at a concentration of 100 mg/mL in drug-free and drug positive urines. The sponsor states that they was no cross-reactivity detected. The compounds are listed in the package insert.
The sponsor evaluated urine pH for test interference in negative urine specimens and in specimens with concentrations of 50% above the cutoff. The specimens were adjusted to pH ranges from 4.5 to 9. The testing results were summarized in the tables below. The results showed that there was no interference from urine pH ranging from 4.5 to 9 with either the TCA or the PPX test.
Negative Urine
| pH range | TCA | PPX |
| --- | --- | --- |
| pH 4.5 | - | - |
| pH 5 | - | - |
| pH 6 | - | - |
| pH 7 | - | - |
| pH 8 | - | - |
| pH 9 | - | - |
50% above the cutoff Urine
(TCA positive urine: Nortriptyline at 1500 ng/mL)
(PPX positive urine: Propoxyphene at 450 ng/mL)
| pH range | TCA | PPX |
| --- | --- | --- |
| pH 4.5 | + | + |
| pH 5 | + | + |
| pH 6 | + | + |
| pH 7 | + | + |
| pH 8 | + | + |
| pH 9 | + | + |
The sponsor evaluated specific gravity interference by adding distilled water
{7}
and sodium chloride to negative urine specimens and to specimens that were 50% above the cutoff. The specific gravity values ranged from 1.002 to 1.035. The control used was an unaltered urine sample. The results are listed in the table below and showed that urine specific gravity does not interfere with the TCA and propoxyphene tests.
Negative Urine
| Specific Gravity | TCA | PPX |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1.01 (control) | - | - |
| 1.002 | - | - |
| 1.02 | - | - |
| 1.035 | - | - |
150% cutoff urine sample
| Specific Gravity | TCA | PPX |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1.01 (control) | + | + |
| 1.002 | + | + |
| 1.02 | + | + |
| 1.035 | + | + |
f. Assay cut-off:
The identified cutoff concentrations of the assays are commonly found in industry. There are no recommended cutoffs for these assays by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). TCA has a cutoff of 1000 ng/mL and propoxyphene has a cutoff of 300 ng/mL.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The UCP Rapid Drug Screening TCA and PPX Tests were compared to the predicate devices and reference methods. The TCA test was compared to HPLC and the PPX was compared to the GC/MS reference method. One hundred and forty (140) clinical urine samples containing drug free urine (52), nortriptyline (48), amitriptyline (16), imipramine (10), desipramine (10) and Nortriptyline/Amitriptyline combined (4) were tested by the predicate devices and on the reference methods at the sponsor's facility. Thirteen percent of the clinical urine samples contained drug concentrations between 50% below the cutoff and the cutoff for each drug tested. Another thirteen percent of the clinical urine samples contained drug concentrations between the cutoff and 50% above the cutoff for each drug tested.
{8}
Tricyclic Antidepressant Comparison Study:
Candidate Device Results vs. Predicate Device Results
| | Positive by Predicate Device | Negative by Predicate Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Positive by Candidate Device | 68 | 2 |
| Negative by Candidate Device | 5 | 65 |
% Agreement among positive is 97%
% Agreement among negative is 93%
Candidate Device Results vs. HPLC at cutoff 1000 ng/mL values
| Candidate Device Results | Less than half the cutoff concentration | Near Cutoff Negative (Between 50% below the cutoff and the cutoff concentration | Near Cutoff Positive (Between the cutoff and 50% above the cutoff concentration) | High Positive (greater than 50% above the cutoff concentration) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 0 | 0 | 17 * | 52 |
| Negative | 52 | 18 ** | 1 * | 0 |
GC/MS values are used to categorize the samples in this table.
% Agreement among positive is 100%
% Agreement among negative is 98.6%
* 12 samples contained nortriptyline above 1000 ng/mL and below 1500 ng/mL, 6 samples contained amitriptyline, desipramine, or imipramine at concentrations equivalent to >1000 ng/mL nortriptyline and < 1500 ng/mL nortriptyline.
** 12 samples contained nortriptyline below 1000 ng/mL and above 500 ng/mL, 6 samples contained amitriptyline, desipramine, or imipramine at concentrations equivalent to <1000 ng/ml nortriptyline and >500 ng/mL nortriptyline.
UCP Rapid Drug Screening PPX Test Vs Predicate Device Results
| | Positive by Predicate Device | Negative by Predicate Device |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Positive by UCP Device | 63 | 1 |
| Negative by UCP Device | 1 | 63 |
* Percent agreement among positive is 98%
*Percent agreement among negative is 98%
{9}
UCP Rapid Drug Screening PPX Test vs. GC/MS at cutoff 300 ng/mL value
| UCP Device Results | Less than half the cutoff conc. | Between 50% below the cutoff and the cutoff conc. | Between the cutoff and 50% above the cutoff con. | More than 50% above the cutoff conc. |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Positive | 0 | 1 | 11 | 52 |
| Negative | 52 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
* Percent agreement among positive is 98%
*Percent agreement among negative is 98%
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable. This assay is intended for only one sample matrix.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.