K060651 · St Jude Medical · NFA · Sep 13, 2006 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K060651
Device Name
PROXIS SYSTEM, MODEL EPS101
Applicant
St Jude Medical
Product Code
NFA · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Sep 13, 2006
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1250
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Proxis System is indicated for use as a proximal embolic protection system to prevent distal release of and to aspirate embolic material (thrombus/debris) in saphenous vein coronary bypass graft(s) (3.0 mm -- 5.0 mm) during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or stenting procedures. The Proxis System is also indicated to control the flow of fluids in the coronary and peripheral vasculature. The safety and effectiveness of this device as an embolic protection system has not been established in the cerebral, carotid or peripheral vasculature; native coronary arteries; or for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Device Story
Proxis System is a proximal embolic protection device used during percutaneous coronary interventions. It consists of an evacuation sheath catheter, inflation device, aspiration syringe, lip seal, and strainer basket. The device is tracked over a guidewire to a position proximal to the lesion. A sealing balloon is inflated to stop antegrade flow, creating a stagnant flow environment; this prevents distal embolization during lesion treatment. After intervention, the device aspirates fluid and embolic debris from the vessel. An optional infusion catheter may deliver saline to the site during aspiration. Used by interventional cardiologists in a clinical setting (e.g., cath lab). The device provides proximal occlusion, differing from distal protection systems. It benefits patients by reducing the risk of distal emboli release during graft procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Proximal Trial: prospective, randomized, multi-center study (n=594 analyzed). Compared Proxis System (test) vs. distal protection devices (control). Primary endpoint: MACE. Intent-to-treat MACE: 9.2% (Proxis) vs 10.0% (Control), p=0.006 for non-inferiority. Per-protocol MACE: 7.1% (Proxis) vs 10.2% (Control), p=0.001. As-treated MACE: 7.1% (Proxis) vs 11.7% (Control), p<0.001. Results demonstrate non-inferiority to distal protection systems.
Technological Characteristics
Proximal embolic protection system. Components: Evacuation sheath catheter (over-the-wire), CO2-actuated inflation device, aspiration syringe, lip seal, strainer basket. Compatible with 7F+ guide catheters. Provides proximal vessel occlusion via balloon inflation. Non-clinical testing included biocompatibility, sterilization, and shelf-life validation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or stenting in saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts (3.0-5.0 mm). Contraindicated for use in cerebral, carotid, or peripheral vasculature, native coronary arteries, or patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous catheter is a device that is introduced into a vein or artery through the skin using a dilator and a sheath (introducer) or guide wire.
PercuSurge GuardWire Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System (K013913)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
K060651
# 510(K) SUMMARY
SEP 1 3 2006
#### ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION 1.1.
| Name: | St. Jude Medical |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------|
| Address: | 6550 Wedgwood Road North |
| | Suite 150 |
| | Maple Grove, MN 55311 |
| Phone: | 763-463-4700 |
| Fax: | 763-488-9780 |
| Contact Person: | Kimberly Briggs |
| | Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist |
| Date: | March 10, 2006 |
#### PROXIS SYSTEM DEVICE INFORMATION 1.2.
| Name of Device: | Proxis System |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| Common Name: | Proximal Embolic Protection Device |
| Classification Name: | Device, coronary saphenous vein bypass graft, temporary, |
| | for embolization protection (870.1250) |
| Device Classification: | Class II |
| Product Code: | NFA |
### PREDICATE DEVICE INFORMATION 1.2.1.
The Proxis System included in this 510k submission is a modification to the current Proxis System by implementing three primary design changes and an expansion of indications to allow for use as an embolic protection system.
This Proxis System is physically identical to the predicate Proxis System, which is market cleared for a Flow Control indication (K042117) with the exception of three primary design modifications. The three primary changes include: Proxis catheter type changed from 'rapid-exchange' type to an 'over-the-wire' type., inflation device change from syringe type w/saline to pushbutton type w/CO2 and the backend configuration changed from a double Y-adaptor to a single Y-adaptor. The Proxis System is similar in function and intended use to market cleared predicate embolic protection systems: the FilterWire (K023691), GuardWire Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System
l
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### 1.2.2. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Proxis System is a proximal embolic protection system used in conjunction with other interventional devices. The Proxis System protects the patient from distal embolization by preventing antegrade flow of emboli release during an interventional procedure and then removing it from the vessel. The Proxis System consists of an Evacuation Sheath Catheter compatible with 7F or larger guide catheters, Inflation device, Aspiration syringe, Lip Seal and Strainer basket. In addition, an optional accessory called the Proxis Infusion Catheter (packaged separately, K023548) may be used with Proxis System.
The Proxis catheter is loaded onto the guide wire and tracked down to the distal portion of the guide catheter and proximal to the lesion site. To minimize the occlusion time, the interventional devices are advanced through the Proxis catheter and positioned near the distal tip. When the sealing balloon is inflated, antegrade flow of the fluid in the target vessel is prevented. To minimize the release of embolic material, stagnation of flow is accomplished before any devices touch or cross- the lesion(s).
In the stagnant flow, the guide wire is advanced across the lesion site and the interventional device is tracked over the guide wire. After the treatment, fluid and particles from the procedure are evacuated using the aspiration syringe. If there is insufficient venous or collateral flow, the Proxis Infusion Catheter (optional accessory) may be used to deliver saline distal to the treatment site while simultaneously applying vacuum to evacuate fluid and particles from the treatment site.
### 1.2.3. INTENDED USE
The Proxis System is indicated for use as a proximal embolic protection system to prevent distal release of and to aspirate embolic material (thrombus/debris) in saphenous vein coronary bypass graft(s) (3.0 mm -- 5.0 mm) during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or stenting procedures.
The Proxis System is also indicated to control the flow of fluids in the coronary and peripheral vasculature.
The safety and effectiveness of this device as an embolic protection system has not been established in the cerebral, carotid or peripheral vasculature; native coronary arteries; or for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
{2}------------------------------------------------
#### TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 1.2.4.
The Proxis device is physically the same Proxis device that was cleared under the flow-control indication (K042117) with the exception of three primary design modifications. The three primary changes include: Proxis catheter type ('over-the-wire' vs. 'rapid-exchange'), inflation device (pushbutton type w/CO2 vs. syringe type w/saline) and the backend configuration (single Y-adaptor vs. double Y-adaptor). The other difference is an expansion of the indications for embolic protection. The embolic protection expansion is supported by clinical data from the Proximal Trial that demonstrates substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices that have similar indications, i.e. FiiterWire EX Embolic Protection System (K023691) and PercuSurge GuardWire Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System (K013913) and the Kensey Nash TriActiv (K042040). The primary difference in technologies to the predicate devices is that the Proxis System provides proximal occlusion vs. distal occlusion.
## SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTING 1.3.
Non-clinical verification and validation of the Proxis System was performed through extensive in vitro bench testing, biocompatibility testing, and sterilization, shelf life testing and in vivo animal studies. Results of the testing demonstrated that the Proxis System design met all specifications and intended uses.
#### SUMMARY OF CLINICAL DATA 1.4.
The modifications to the Proxis System do not impact the therapeutic aspect of the Proxis Embolic Protection System. As such, a physician evaluation (20 patients) was performed to evaluate the usability aspects of the modified Proxis System as compared to the current Proxis System. In addition, the Proximal Trial was performed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the current Proxis System for embolic protection during percutaneous treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenosis. The study consisted of a test arm (Proxis Embolic Protection System + current practice) and a control arm (current practice with market cleared distal protection devices, FilterWire and GuardWire). Six-hundred (600) randomized patients, with 117 additional roll-in and 5 educational patients were enrolled in 68 investigational sites in Canada, Europe and the United States. Five-hundred ninety-four (594) randomized patients were included in the analysis. The following conclusions resulted from the study:
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Patient Group | MACE | Confidence Intervals | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|----------------------|------------------------------|
| Intent to treat (as randomized) | Test (n=294) | 9.2% | Diff -0.8 CI [-5.5%, 4.0%] |
| | Control (n=300) | 10.0% | P=0.006 for non-inferiority |
| Per Protocol (patients who<br>received the assigned<br>device) | Proxis (n=240) | 7.1% | Diff -3.1 CI [-8.1%, 2.0%] |
| | Distal (n=236) | 10.2% | P=0.001 for non-inferiority |
| As treated (patients<br>analyzed based on<br>treatment received) | Proxis (n=241) | 7.1% | Diff -4.6 CI [-9.6%, 0.3%] |
| | Distal (n=282) | 11.7% | P<0.001 for non-inferiority |
| | No Protection (n=70) | 10.0% | |
| Mid-Portion (patients who<br>could be treated with either<br>device) | Proxis (n=177) | 6.2% | Diff -5.0 CI [-10.6%, 0.6%] |
| | Distal (n=205) | 11.2% | P=0.0001 for non-inferiority |
## ..! T--i-1 D « .......
# । '5 CONCLUSION
・・・
.
In conclusion, the Proxis System included in this submission is substantially equivalent to the existing Proxis System (K042117), FilterWire Embolic Protection System (K023691), Guardwire Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System (K023878), and TriActiv (K042040).
{4}------------------------------------------------
# DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/2 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The seal features an abstract image of an eagle with three lines forming its body and wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
SEP 1 3 2006
Ms. Kimberly Briggs Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist St. Jude Medical 6550 Wedgwood Road North, Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55311
> K060651 Trade/Device Name: Proxis System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1250 Regulation Name: Percutaneous Catheter Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NFA Dated: September 8, 2006 Received: September 11, 2006
# Dear Ms. Briggs:
Re:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the cnclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it rr your de rice is exactive in controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 – Ms. Kimberly Briggs
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Duna R. Willing
(A Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known):
510(k) Number (if known): K060605
Device Name: Proxis System
Indications for Use:
The Proxis System is indicated for use as a proximal embolic protection system to prevent distal release of and to aspirate embolic material (thrombus/debris) in saphenous vein coronary bypass graft(s) (3.0 mm – 5.0 mm) during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or stenting procedures.
The Proxis System is also indicated to control the flow of fluids in the coronary and peripheral vasculature.
The safety and effectiveness of this device as an embolic protection system has not been established in the cerebral, carotid or peripheral vasculature; native coronary arteries; or for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
X Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Duna R. Vachner
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Page 1 of 1
510(k) Number_K066665 5
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.