The Micrus Courier Microcatheters are intended to assist in the delivery of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents such as occlusion coils, into peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
Device Story
Micrus Courier Microcatheters are single-lumen, intravascular diagnostic/therapeutic catheters. Device consists of flexible shaft (Pebax/nylon with PTFE liner, stainless steel reinforcement), atraumatic distal tip with two radiopaque markers, luer hub, and hydrophilic coating. Used by physicians in clinical settings to navigate peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature. Operates by manual advancement/retraction to deliver contrast media or embolic coils. Radiopaque markers facilitate visualization under fluoroscopy for precise placement. Benefits include improved trackability through tortuous anatomy and compatibility with specific embolic coil systems, aiding in minimally invasive vascular procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data. Testing included tensile strength, flexibility/stiffness, burst pressure (>300 PSI), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1), air/liquid leakage (ISO 10555-1), fatigue tolerance in tortuous arterial models, corrosion resistance, kink resistance, tracking force, and tip shape retention.
Technological Characteristics
Single-lumen catheter; materials: Pebax, nylon, PTFE liner, stainless steel reinforcement; hydrophilic coating (Hydromer); two radiopaque marker bands; EtO sterilization (SAL 10^-6); dimensions vary by model (165, 170, 190, 210) with ID 0.0165"-0.0210" and OD 1.7-3.0 Fr; manual operation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for delivery of diagnostic agents (contrast media) and therapeutic agents (occlusion coils) into peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An intravascular diagnostic catheter is a device used to record intracardiac pressures, to sample blood, and to introduce substances into the heart and vessels. Included in this generic device are right-heart catheters, left-heart catheters, and angiographic catheters, among others.
{0}------------------------------------------------
# Safety and Efficacy Summary ll.
## A. Contact Information
K.016
Margaret Webber Director, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs Micrus Endovascular Corporation 610 Palomar Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94085
## B. Device Name
Micrus Microcatheters, Courier," 165, 170, 190, & 210 Device: Catheter, Intravascular, Diagnostic Regulation Number: 870.1200 Product Code: DQO Device Class: 2
## C. Predicate Device(s)
| Number | Description | Clearance Date |
|---------|------------------------------------|----------------|
| K032624 | Micrus Microcatheter, Concourse-14 | Sept 10, 2003 |
## D. Device Description
The Micrus Microcatheters consist of 4 major components:
- 트 A flexible shaft with a lubricious liner extruded from Teflon. The shaft is reinforced with stainless steel (coiled distally and braided proximally). The outer shaft jacket is made from Pebax and nylon Grilamid L25).
- 트 An atraumatic distal flexible tip containing two radiopaque marker bands. The marker bands are useful in tracking catheter tip position and during placement of detachable embolic coils.
- l A standard luer hub insert, which is molded onto the flexible shaft.
- l A hydrophilic coating (Hydromer), which covers the distal 100 centimeters of the Microcatheters.
### E. Intended Use
The Micrus Courier Microcatheters are intended to assist in the delivery of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents such as occlusion coils, into peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
{1}------------------------------------------------
# F. Intended Use Predicate Device (per products' Instructions for Use)
The Micrus Microcatheter, Concourse-14 is intended to assist in the delivery of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents such as occlusion coils, into peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Micrus Endovascular Corporation
.
| G. Technological (Physical and Mechanical) Characteristics as Compared to Predicate | | | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Characteristic | Predicate: Micrus Concourse-14 | Micrus Courier 165, 170, 190, & 210 | Equivalence |
| Shaft Materials | Pebax with PTFE liner | Pebax and nylon with PTFE liner | Substantially equivalent |
| Shaft Design | Flexible single lumen shaft. The catheter shaft is made from Pebax with a PTFE liner. The distal flexible tip is atraumatic with 2 radiopaque markers. | Flexible single lumen shaft. The catheter shaft is made from Pebax & nylon with a PTFE liner. The distal flexible tip is atraumatic with 2 radiopaque markers. | Substantially equivalent |
| Distal Shaft Length<br>(dry & hydrated states) | 20 to 25 cm | 30 to 35 cm | Substantially equivalent |
| Proximal ID/OD<br>(dry & hydrated states) | ID: 0.0165" – 175"<br><br>OD: 0.031" (2.4 French) | Inner diameters are within specifications:<br>Courier 165 ID is .0165" minimum<br>Courier 170 ID is 0.0170" minimum<br>Courier 190 ID is 0.0190" minimum<br>Courier 210 ID is 0.0210" minimum<br>Outer diameters are within specifications:<br>Courier 165 OD is 0.033" max. (2.3 Fr.)<br>Courier 170 OD is 0.034" max. (2.4 Fr.)<br>Courier 190 OD is 0.042" max. (3.0 Fr.)<br>Courier 210 OD is 0.042" max. (3.0 Fr.) | Substantially equivalent |
| Distal ID/OD<br>(Dimensions unchanged in<br>dry & hydrated states) | ID: 0.0165"<br><br>OD: 0.025" (1.9 French) | Inner diameters are within specifications:<br>Courier 165 ID is .0165" minimum<br>Courier 170 ID is 0.0170" minimum<br>Courier 190 ID is 0.0190" minimum<br>Courier 210 ID is 0.0210" minimum<br>Outer diameters are within specifications:<br>Courier 165 OD is 0.023" max. (1.7 Fr.)<br>Courier 170 OD is 0.024" max. (1.8 Fr.)<br>Courier 190 OD is 0.032" max. (2.5 Fr.)<br>Courier 210 OD is 0.032" max. (2.5 Fr.) | Substantially equivalent |
. \$ C rı 1 iaal /Dhara т. て
{3}------------------------------------------------
Micrus Endovascular Corporation
、
| Shaft Marker | Tip Markers | Coating | Effective Length<br>(dry & hydrated states) | MicroCoil Compatibility | New feature. |
|----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| No shaft marker | Two radiopaque marker bands, spaced 3 cm apart. | Hydrophilic coating. | 150 cm (59") | Coils:<br>Compatible with 10-System embolic coils.<br>Wires:<br>Compatible with 0.010" and 0.014" guide wires. | Substantially<br>equivalent |
| Shaft marker located at 90 cm from the distal tip. | Two radiopaque marker bands, spaced 3 cm apart. | Hydrophilic coating. | 150 cm (59") | Coils:<br>Courier 165 & 170 are compatible with 10-System embolic coils; Courier 190 & 210 are compatible with 18-System coils.<br>Wires:<br>Courier 165 & 170 are compatible with 0.010" and 0.014" guide wires; Courier 190 & 210 are compatible with 0.014" and 0.018" guide wires. | Substantially<br>equivalent |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Micrus Endovascular Corporat
# H.
Dicusson of Non-Clinical Tests and Concludes were based upon the intended use of the dovin
the performal tots performed on the Microcations of SC Sterlits, included and reall
The following table outlines the important device characteristics and the non-clinical test data generated:
| Test or<br>Comparison | Concourse-14 | Courier 165, 170, 190, & 210 | Substantial<br>Equivalence |
|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| Tensile strength<br>and tip attachment<br>strength | The shaft to hub junction has a minimum<br>tensile strength of 1.12 lb (5 Newtons).<br>All transition junctions of the shaft have a<br>minimum tensile strength of 0.67 lb (3<br>Newtons). | The shaft to hub junction has a minimum<br>tensile strength of 1.12 lb (5 Newtons). All<br>transition junctions of the shaft have a<br>minimum tensile strength of 0.67 lb (3<br>Newtons). | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Flexibility/Stiffness | Demonstrates adequate flexibility to bend<br>easily when under pressure, such as that<br>exerted by vessel tortuosity. | As compared to the predicate,<br>demonstrates adequate flexibility to bend<br>easily when under pressure, such as that<br>exerted by vessel tortuosity. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Burst Pressure | Demonstrates a burst strength greater than<br>300 PSI. | Demonstrates a burst strength greater than<br>300 PSI. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Biocompatibility | Materials in the microcatheter<br>successfully pass all biocompatibility<br>testing per ISO 10993-1. | Materials in the microcatheter successfully<br>pass all biocompatibility testing per ISO<br>10993-1. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Air leakage at hub | No air leakage during testing with<br>negative pressure applied to the catheter<br>hub per ISO 10555-1. | No air leakage during testing with negative<br>pressure applied to the catheter hub per<br>ISO 10555-1. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Liquid leakage | Demonstrates there is no liquid leakage<br>during testing at 46.4 PSI (maintained for<br>30 seconds) per ISO 10555-1. | Demonstrates there is no liquid leakage<br>during testing at 46.4 PSI (maintained for<br>30 seconds) per ISO 10555-1. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Fatigue tolerance<br>and catheter<br>material integrity | | Catheter advanced and retracted 20 times<br>in a tortuous arterial model with a 150-<br>micron filter in a distal location. No<br>catheter particulate or debris resulted from<br>the rigorous stress placed upon the<br>catheter during advancement and<br>retraction | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Chemical<br>Integrity/Corrosion<br>Resistance | Demonstrates corrosion resistance per<br>ISO 10555-1 in saline solution and boiling<br>distilled water. | No change to the design of the Courier<br>microcatheters affected corrosion<br>resistance. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Material Used | Pebax shaft. PTFE liner. Hydrophilic<br>coating. All materials are biocompatible. | Pebax shaft. PTFE liner. Hydrophilic<br>coating. All materials are biocompatible. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Labeling | Label content complies with regulatory<br>requirements of all markets where the<br>product is sold. Product labels contain at<br>least 2 removable stickers, which specify<br>the catalog number, lot number and<br>product name. | Label content complies with regulatory<br>requirements of all markets where the<br>product is sold. Product labels contain at<br>least 2 removable stickers, which specify<br>the catalog number, lot number and<br>product name. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Proximal shaft kink<br>radius | Demonstrates a minimum kink resistant<br>radius | Demonstrates a minimum kink resistant<br>radius of 0.325" in the proximal shaft. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Distal shaft kink<br>radius | Demonstrates a minimum kink resistant<br>radius of 0.07" in the distal shaft. | Demonstrates a minimum kink resistant<br>radius of 0.07" in the distal shaft. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Tracking force | Demonstrates the microcatheter is able to<br>track through a tortuous path. | Demonstrates the microcatheter is able to<br>track through a tortuous path with less or<br>equal force (friction) than the predicate | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| | | | |
| Tip shape retention | Demonstrates the Microcatheter maintains<br>its tip shape when subjected to 3 hours of<br>soaking in a 37°C. bath. | Demonstrates the Microcatheter maintains<br>its tip shape when subjected to 3 hours of<br>soaking in a 37°C. bath. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Packaging Integrity | Tyvek Pouch. | Tyvek Pouch. | Equivalent |
| | Sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened<br>packaging that is designed to maintain<br>sterility unless the primary product pouch<br>has been opened or damaged. | Sterile and non-pyrogenic in unopened<br>packaging that is designed to maintain<br>sterility unless the primary product pouch<br>has been opened or damaged. | |
| | Packaging qualified to prevent microbial<br>recontamination for a minimum of 3-yrs. | The Courier microcatheters use the same<br>packaging as is used for the Concourse<br>microcatheter. The package integrity has<br>been qualified to prevent microbial<br>recontamination for a minimum of 3-yrs. | |
| Shipping/transit<br>testing | Demonstrates the microcatheter<br>successfully withstands the domestic and<br>international distribution environment, per<br>ISO 10555-1. | Demonstrates the microcatheter<br>successfully withstands the domestic and<br>international distribution environment, per<br>ISO 10555-1. | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| Sterility | Sterilized using EtO with a sterility<br>assurance level of 10-6 | Sterilized using EtO with a sterility<br>assurance level of 10-6 | Substantially<br>Equivalent |
| | The above non-clinical testing has demonstrated the substantially equivalent performance of the Microcatheters | | |
{5}------------------------------------------------
Micrus Endovascular Corporation
.
.
.
.
{6}------------------------------------------------
The above non-clinical testing has demonstrated the substantially equivalent performance of the Micrus Microcatheters,
"Courier," with the predicate "Concourse" Microcatheter.
41 41
1.1 1
1
The above non-climical testing has and and and and seriormance of the Micrus Micrus Microcalleres,
"Courier," with the produce" Microcaties:
The catheres are single lumen cat
Micrus Endovascular Corporatic
{7}------------------------------------------------
# I. 510(k) Summary of Safety and Efficacy
Based upon the design, materials, function, intended use, comparison with currently marketed devices and the non-clinical testing performed by Micrus Corporation, it is concluded that the "Courier" Microcatheters are substantially equivalent to the "Concourse-14" in safety and effectiveness.
Ray Mabus
Margaret Webber Director, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs Micrus Endovascular Corporation January 9, 2006
{8}------------------------------------------------
# DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/8/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized depiction of an eagle or bird-like figure with three curved lines representing its body and wings. The logo is surrounded by the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the emblem.
# Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
12 2006 MAY
Micrus Endovascular Corporation c/o Ms. Margaret Webber Director, Regulatory and Clinical Affairs 821 Fox Lane San Jose. CA 95131
K060116 Re:
Micrus Courier Microcatheters Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1200 Regulation Name: Catheter Intravascular, Diagnostic Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DQO Dated: March 31, 2006 Received: April 4, 2006
Dear Ms. Webber:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{9}------------------------------------------------
# Page 2 - Ms. Margaret Webber
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Duna R. Voelmer
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{10}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): _ |< C 6 O / 16
Device Name: Micrus Courier Microcatheters" Model #s MST165000-00. MST170000-00, MST190000-00, & MST210000-00
Indications For Use:
The Micrus Courier microcatheters are intended to assist in the delivery of diagnostic agents, such as contrast media, and therapeutic agents such as occlusion coils, into peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
bana R. la Innes
510(k) Numbe
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.