K060076 · Surgicount Medical · LWH · Mar 14, 2006 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K060076
Device Name
SURGICOUNT SAFETY-SPONGE SYSTEM
Applicant
Surgicount Medical
Product Code
LWH · General Hospital
Decision Date
Mar 14, 2006
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 880.2740
Device Class
Class 1
Indications for Use
The SurgiCount Medical Safety-Sponge System™ is indicated for use in counting and recording the number of thermally labeled surgical sponges, laparotomy sponges and towels used during surgical procedure.
Device Story
System comprises thermally labeled surgical sponges/towels and a mobile computer with specialized software. Each sponge/towel features a unique identification label. During surgery, a handheld laser imager scans labels to track items entering and exiting the surgical field. Software records initial counts, tracks items in use, and reports totals on demand or at procedure end. Used in surgical settings by operating personnel. Provides real-time inventory management to ensure all sponges are accounted for before surgical closure. Benefits patient by reducing risk of retained surgical items.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study conducted under non-significant risk IRB approval in a surgical setting. Evaluated accuracy of sponge counts (in/out of field, clean/soiled), time efficiency, and ease of use. Results demonstrated the system functioned as intended, accurately counting sponges with no adverse events reported. Data supported substantial equivalence to existing manual counting and inventory control methods.
Technological Characteristics
Non-absorbable gauze sponges/towels with x-ray detectable strips and unique thermally attached identification labels. System uses a mobile computer with a handheld laser imaging scanner. Software performs inventory counting and reporting. Connectivity via mobile hardware platform. Biocompatible materials.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use in counting and recording thermally labeled surgical sponges, laparotomy sponges, and towels during surgical procedures.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A surgical sponge scale is a nonelectrically powered device used to weigh surgical sponges that have been used to absorb blood during surgery so that, by comparison with the known dry weight of the sponges, an estimate may be made of the blood lost by the patient during surgery.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K060076
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for Surgicount Medical. The logo consists of a grid of black squares on the left, followed by the word "SURGICOUNT" in large, bold letters. Below that, the word "MEDICAL" is written in white letters on a black background. The text "A Division of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc." is below the black background, and the phrase "You Can Count On Us TM" is at the bottom.
MAR 1 4 2006
1/3
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 3 emecula, CA 92591 P: 951-587-6201, F: 951-587-6
## 510(K) SUMMARY (21 CFR 807.92)
#### SURGICOUNT MEDICAL SAFETY-SPONGE SYSTEM
- SurgiCount Medical division of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. 510(k) Owner: 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 330 Temecula, CA 92591 Tel: 951-587-6201 Fax: 951-587-6237
- Contact Person: Sharon Rockwell Tel: 714-695-9269 E-mail: srockwell@writeme.com
- Date Prepared: December, 2005
- Trade Name: Safety Sponge™ System
- Common Name: Surgical sponge and surgical sponge counter
- Classification Name: Nonabsorbable gauze for internal use per 21 CFR 878.4450, GDY Surgical sponge counter, unclassified, 21 CFR 888.2740, LWH
- Predicate Devices: Tyco/Kendall X-ray detectable surgical sponges Tyco BAG-IT Sponge Counting System SMS Blood Bank Transfusion System, BK960036
- Device Description: The Safety Sponges include surgical sponges, laparatomy pads and surgical towels, each unit of which contains a unique identification label permanently fused to the gauze or fabric. The labels allow the sponges and towels to be individually recognized by a commercially available sight laser imager.
The Safety Sponge Counter is a commercially available mobile computer with specialized software designed for mobile data collection. Integrated imaging technology allows capture of the information coded in the unique identification label on the sponges, pads and towels. The computer counts the initial number of sponges opened, and using the custom software program, reports the total sponges used at the end of the procedure or on
{1}------------------------------------------------
demand, and compares that number to the original. Individual sponges may be identified as entered into the surgical field but not discarded, so that the surgical field can be explored before surgically closing the patient.
The SurgiCount Medical Safety-Sponge System is indicated for Intended Use: use in counting and recording the number of thermally labeled surgical sponges, laparatomy sponges and surgical towels used during surgical procedures.
> The indications are similar to those of the predicate device, BAG-IT Sponge Counting System by Tyco; "for efficient counting and containment of lap sponges, and for constant visibility for assessing blood loss and counting of sponges."
> The SurgiCount Medical indications are also comparable to a software module from Advanced Medical Systems (AMS), approved under 510(k) BK960036, "for inventory management of bank transfusion systems, which require unique blood identifications." Though the AMS software module is used for blood bags, it is designed to run on general purpose hardware platforms supplied by commercial manufacturers, and records patient identification, counts of blood bags in different stages of inventory, and reports the total number of bags in a particular location, or on demand. The counting of blood bags is comparable to the counting of surgical sponges and is not critical to the intended use of the software.
Technological Characteristics:
Surgical sponges from SurgiCount Medical arc identical to those of Tyco/Kendall in terms of technological characteristics. Both are non-absorbable gauze with x-ray detectable strips. The SurgiCount Medical sponges, pads and towels have a unique identifying label thermally attached to every sponge, pad and towel. The thermal label identifies the product to the hand held scanner which reads the label with a commercially available laser imaging reader on a mobile computer. The scanner can read the label through blood and bodily fluids. A customized software program, similar to the predicate software for inventory control of blood bags, uses the scanned information to count the number of items used at the beginning of a surgical procedure, and then again at appropriate times as indicated by hospital practice, such as just before surgical closure. The sponge count in and out of the procedure can be helpful in determining if any sponges may of the Procedural sponge counts can be obtained on inside a patient.
{2}------------------------------------------------
K066076
1/3
demand from the mobile computer, or at the end of the procedure for a permanent report.
Non-Clinical
Non-clinical testing included demonstrating permanence of the Performance Data: label on gauze pads, biocompatibility of the label material, manufacturing validation that one and only one unique label was placed per pad, software validation of the hand-held scanning device, and simulated finished product testing of the total system. Results showed that the gauze labels do not flake or peel, and that the material is comparable to commercially available predicates in terms of biocompatibility. The validated software functioned as intended under simulated use, properly counting sponges in simulated body fluids and providing hard copy reports equivalent to those used for blood bag inventory products. The testing supports a determination of substantial equivalence to products and technologies previously cleared by FDA.
- The SurgiCount Safety-Sponge System has been tested clinically Clinical Data: under non-significant risk IRB approvals in a surgical setting. The device functioned as intended, and accurately counted surgical sponges into and out of the field, on both clean and soiled sponges. The study compared accuracy of sponge counts as well as time spent for counting sponges, and operating personnel's assessment of the software program and ease of use. No adverse events were Results supported substantial equivalence to reported. commercially available surgical sponges and counters used for inventory control of other medical devices.
- The non-clinical and clinical test results demonstrate the thermally Conclusions: labeled sponges are as safe as the predicate device, and the software installed on the commercially available mobile computer performs accurately, making its use more effective than hand counting sponges. The system provides improved accuracy, comparable to inventory control systems used for blood bag counting.
{3}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The seal features a stylized eagle with three stripes representing health, services, and human. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAR 1 4 2006
SurgiCount Medical c/o Rockwell & Associates Ms. Sharon Rockwell 5582 Chalon Road Yorba Linda, California 92886
Re: K060076
Trade/Device Name: SurgiCount Medical Safety-Sponge System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.2740 Regulation Name: Surgical sponge scale Regulatory Class: I Product Code: LWH Dated: December 21, 2005 Received: January 10, 2006
Dear Ms. Rockwell:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device we nave reviewed your bection of the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate for use stated in the encrosare) to tegals) to tegals (1976) the Medical Device Amendments, or to
commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical For J. Day commerce proof to May 20, 1976, the encordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). and Cosment Act (Act) that do not require appro the general controls provisions of the Act. The 1 ou may, therefore, market the act include requirements for annual registration, listing of general controls provisions of use ice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it If your device is classified (500 a00 roy ins. Existing major regulations affecting your device can
may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major and contributi may be subject to such additional controller Listing of Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean Flease be advised that 11971 is issuance or our device complies with other requirements of the Act that I DA has made a and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must of any I cacal statutes and regenanents, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 Comply with an the Hel 37equirements) (1); good manufacturing practice requirements as set Of It Fart 607); adoning (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic forth in the quality by over of sions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 – Ms. Sharon Rockwell
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) This letter will and w you'ls ough finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally prematics notification. The stars in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please ir you deems of Compliance at (240) 276-0115. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small other general informational and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
dl.mde
Mark N. Melke Acting Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
SurgiCount Medical Traditional 510(k) Safety-Sponge System™
K060076
December, 2005
## TAB 4
# INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known): K060076
Device Name: SurgiCount Medical Safety-Sponge System™
Indications for Use:
The SurgiCount Medical Safety-Sponge System™ is indicated for use in counting and recording the number of thermally labeled surgical sponges, laparotomy sponges and towels used during surgical procedure.
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
#### (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Page | of l
e2gmdl.
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number_ Ko60076
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.