K053488 · Conformis, Inc. · NPJ · Mar 9, 2006 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K053488
Device Name
CONFORMIS BICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPAIR SYSTEM
Applicant
Conformis, Inc.
Product Code
NPJ · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Mar 9, 2006
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3560
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is intended for use in patients with severe knee joint pain and disability whose conditions cannot be solely addressed by the use of a prosthetic device that treats only a single knee compartment, such as a unicondylar or patellofemoral prosthesis. The indications for use include restoring joint function and relief of pain due to: - painful joint disease due to osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or . rheumatoid arthritis of the knee - post traumatic loss of joint function . - . failed osteotomies, hemiarthoplasties and unicondylar implants. The BiCompartmental Knee Repair System may be utilized when the medial or lateral condyle and the patellofcmoral areas have been affected by one or more of these conditions. The ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is intended only for use with bone cement.
Device Story
Patient-specific femorotibial semi-constrained total knee implant; designed from patient CT or MRI scans to match natural bone geometry. Inputs: patient imaging data. Processing: software removes surface defects to create smooth design image; Solid Works OTS software used for design. Output: custom metallic device (cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy) and UHMWP tibial/patellar components. Used in clinical settings by orthopedic surgeons. Device restores joint function and relieves pain in patients with multi-compartment knee disease. Integrates with ConforMIS Unicondylar Knee Replacement System tibial components and ConforMIS Total Knee Repair System patellofemoral components.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Materials: Cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy (ASTM-F-1537) and Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (ASTM-F-648). Design: Patient-specific, semi-constrained, cemented. Connectivity: None. Sterilization: Not specified. Software: Uses OTS software for surface design and defect removal.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients with severe knee joint pain and disability due to osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic loss of function, or failed prior surgeries (osteotomies, hemiarthroplasties, unicondylar implants) where single-compartment treatment is insufficient. Applicable when medial or lateral condyle and patellofemoral regions are affected. Requires bone cement.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A knee joint patellofemorotibial polymer/metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a knee joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a tibial component or components and a retropatellar resurfacing component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
{0}------------------------------------------------
MAR 9 2006
510(k) Summary
# ConforMIS, Inc.
# BiCompartmental Knee Repair System
# 510(k) Premarket Notification K_0 5-34 88
# GENERAL INFORMATION
## Manufacturer:
ConforMIS Inc. 323 C Vintage Park Drive Foster City, CA 94404 Phone 650-286-4151 FAX 650-286-4160
## Contact Person:
Patrick Hess, PhD Chief Executive Officer ConforMIS, Inc.
Date Prepared: December 5, 2005
# DEVICE INFORMATION
Trade/Proprietary Name: BiCompartmental Knee Repair System
Common/Classification Name: Knee joint femorotibial cemented prosthesis
Classification: 21 CFR 888.3530 – Knee joint femorotibial Classifications all polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis.
Device Class: Class II
Device Product Code: NPJ
{1}------------------------------------------------
## PREDICATE DEVICES
The ConforMIS, Inc. BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is substantially equivalent to FDA-approved predicate devices with regard to indications for use and technological characteristics. These predicate devices are:
| Technological Characteristics | Indications for Use |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| • Imaging Therapeutics™ Knee Interpositional<br>Device (K033242)<br>• ConforMIS Unicondylar Knee (K043570) | • Smith & Nephew Hybrid Knee Femoral<br>Components (K042896)<br>• ConforMIS Unicondylar Knee<br>(K043570)<br>• Natrual Knee® - Sulzer Orthopedics<br>(K002356) |
### INTENDED USE
The ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is intended for use in patients with severe knee joint pain and disability whose conditions cannot be solely addressed by the use of a prosthetic device that treats only a single knee compartment, such as a unicondylar or patellofemoral prosthesis. The indications for use include restoring joint function and relief of pain due to:
- painful joint disease due to osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or . rheumatoid arthritis of the knee
- post traumatic loss of joint function .
- . failed osteotomies, hemiarthoplasties and unicondylar implants.
The BiCompartmental Knee Repair System may be utilized when the medial or lateral condyle and the patellofcmoral areas have been affected by one or more of these conditions.
The ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is intended only for use with bone cement.
### PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
The ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is a femorotibial semi-constrained total knee implant. The design of the product incorporates a bone preserving approach, with minimal bone resection, for the treatment of severe pain and/or disability of a knee damaged by osteoarthritis or trauma. It is intended for use in those patients whose condition cannot be appropriately and effectively addressed using a device that treats only a single knee compartment
{2}------------------------------------------------
(i.e. a unicondylar or patellofemoral prosthesis), when the medial or lateral condyle and the patellofemoral regions are affected. Using patient imaging (either CT or MRI scans), a patient specific implant is designed that best meets the geometric and anatomic requirements of the specific patient. The treatment allows for the placement of a cemented metallic device designed from the patient's natural bone geometry. The device is manufactured from cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy (ASTM-F-1537) from data obtained from images of the patient's individual geometry obtained using either CT or MRI scans. The tibial and patellar components are manufactured from Ulta-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene ("UHMWP" ASTM-F-648) The ConforMIS, Inc., Implant Software is used to remove surface defects to produce a working design image of a smooth surface. Off the Shelf (OTS) software is utilized to produce the surface Subsequently, Solid Works OTS software is used to create the design. ConforMIS, Inc., Implant Engineering Drawing. The BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is intended for use in conjunction with the tibial components of the ConforMIS Unicondylar Knee Replacement System and the patellofemoral components of the ConforMIS Total Knee Repair System.
### SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
### Use of the Term "Substantial Equivalence"
The term "Substantial Equivalence" is used in this submission within the confines of the statutory use of the term in the FDA's evaluation of a Pre-Market Notification Submission. Any statement regarding Substantial Equivalence used in this submission relates only to whether the device that is the subject of this submission may be lawfully marketed in the United States without pre-market approval or reclassification, and should not be interpreted as an admission, or any kind or type of evidence, in any patent proceeding, including patent infringement litigation or proceeding before any Patent Office.
The present submission and statements therefore should not be construed as affecting or relating to the scope of any patent application, or to whether the product addressed in the submission, or its use, may be considered indistinct, from a patentability perspective, from any other device referred to in this submission.
#### Technological Characteristics
The technological characteristics of the ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System are substantially equivalent to those of the cited predicate orthonedic devices. The image analysis is identical to that used for the Imaging Therapeutics Interpositional Device (iPD) and the ConforMIS Unicondylar Implant. This device is equivalent in terms of design process, materials, production process, and equipment.
{3}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
Substantial equivalence is also supported for the ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System by the predicate devices previously cited and cleared in the treatment of osteoarthritic knees the use of such a device is warranted.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus, which is a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus. The logo is black and white.
Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
2006 MAR 9
ConforMIS, Inc c/o Patrick Hess, PhD Chief Executive Officer 323 Vintage Park Drive, Suite C Foster City, California 94404
Re: K053488
Trade/Device Name: ConforMIS BiCompartmental Knee Repair System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3530 Regulation Name: Knee joint femorotibial metal/polymer semi-constrained cemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: NPJ Dated: December 13. 2006 Received: December 16, 2006
Dear Dr. Hess:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments. on to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug. and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA). 11 may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21. Parts 800 to 898. In addition. FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination docs not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Patrick Hess, PhD
electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus. permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801). please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0210. Also, please note the regulation emitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (300) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely vours.
Herbert Lewis
Mark N. Melkerson Acting Director Division of General. Retorative and Neurological Devices Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number: K _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Device Name: ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System
Indications for Use:
The ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is intended for The Conformils, Inc., Dicomparinent and disability whose conditions use in pattents with severe know form passes of a prosthetic device that treats only a single knee compartment, such as unicondylar or patellofemoral prosthesis. The indications for use include restoring joint function and relief of pain due to:
- painful joint disease due to osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or . rheumatoid arthritis of the knee
- post traumatic loss of joint function .
- post tradinatio 1005 01 Juliarthoplasties and unicondylar implants. .
The BiCompartmental Knee Repair System may be utilized when the medial The BROMIPATICAL TERS REPART COLLER COLLER COLLECT affected by one or more of these conditions.
The ConforMIS, Inc., BiCompartmental Knee Repair System is intended only for use with bone cement.
Over-The-Counter Use Prescription Use _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Prescription Use _____x_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-
CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Herbert Leunig
(Division Sign-Off) Division of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
**510(k) Number** K053488
003
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.