This device is intended to acquire and condition the ECG signal from a patient so that it can be transmitted via radio frequency to a workstation in a hospital or clinical setting where the ECG is displayed and analyzed. This device is for use with ambulatory adult patients, which need monitoring while undergoing cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation or other monitoring. Patient demographics, exercise protocol information can be entered via wireless input devices or automatically a variety of commercially available. A database can be created for use with an Outcomes program.
Device Story
TeleRehab 2004 is a telemetry monitoring system for cardiac/pulmonary rehabilitation; acquires/conditions ECG signals from ambulatory adult patients; transmits data via radio frequency to a central workstation; used in hospital or clinical settings; operated by clinicians; system includes signal transmitter, receiver, and workstation computers; displays ECG waveforms; stores patient data/demographics; enables tracking of rehabilitation progress; supports database creation for outcomes programs; provides non-diagnostic monitoring; benefits patients by allowing remote or in-hospital monitoring during exercise protocols.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Device performance verified against IEC 60601-1 (safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC), and various EN 61000 series standards for emissions, electrostatic discharge, radiated susceptibility, electrical fast transients, surge, conducted susceptibility, magnetics, and voltage fluctuations. No clinical data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Electrically powered, prescription telemetry system. Components: signal transmitter, receiver, workstation. Connectivity: local area network. Materials: biocompatible medical grade materials for patient contact. Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, EN 55011, EN 61000 series. No sterilization required. Software: PC-based monitoring and reporting.
Indications for Use
Indicated for ambulatory adult patients undergoing cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation or requiring physiological monitoring. Not for diagnostic use.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A radiofrequency physiological signal transmitter and receiver is a device used to condition a physiological signal so that it can be transmitted via radiofrequency from one location to another, e.g., a central monitoring station. The received signal is reconditioned by the device into its original format so that it can be displayed.
Predicate Devices
ScottCare TeleRehab System of Cardiac Rehabilitation (K041607)
Quinton Q-Tel RMS
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
## APR 1 3 2005
### 510(k) SUMMARY
# 510(k) Premarket Notification for ScottCare TeleRehab™ 2004 Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation System (TeleRehab™ 2004)
# Submitter's Name, Address, Telephone Number:
ScottCare Corporation 4791 West 150th Street Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Phone: (216) 362-0550 Facsimile: (216) 267-6129
#### Contact Person:
Wayne Stripe Manager of Quality Assurance ScottCare Corporation
Date Prepared: February 8, 2005
#### Name of Device:
Name of Device:
ScottCare TeleRehab™ 2004 Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation System (TeleRehab™ 2004)
### Name/Address of Sponsor:
ScottCare Corporation 4791 West 150th Street Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Phone: (216) 362-0550 Facsimile: (216) 267-6129
## Common or Usual Name:
Common of 'Usual Prailion Telemetry Monitoring System
#### Classification Name:
Classification Names
#### Predicate Devices:
Predicate Devices:
ScottCare Corporation's "ScottCare TeleRehab™ System of Cardiac Rehabilitation." Scoulcare Corporation's - Beotesare - release - releasement System." (K041607)
### Intended Use:
Intended Use:
This device is intended to acquire and condition the ECG signal from a patient to a veryeration to a veryeration to a veryeration This device is intended to acquire and condition the 2000 telements transmitter to a workstation in a hospital or clinical setting where the ECG is displayed and analyzed. This device is for use in a hospital of cimical setting which need monitoring while undergoing cardiac or pulmonary with ambulatory adult patients, which need monitoring is viewed and stored on a workstation for
{1}------------------------------------------------
tracking of the patients' progress through rehabilitation. Patient demographics, excited insult tracking of the patients "progress unough remoment" a variety of caranters input and medical information can be cifered Tha a Valloy of Section of the face. A database can be created for use with an Outcomes program.
## Technological Characteristics:
Technological Characteristics.
Both the TeleRehabTM 2004 and its' TeleRehab predicate are electrically powered, porchional devices with the same intended function and use. Both incorporation a olinion or pornition principles; have the same basic performance characteristics, are used in a clinical or hospital principles, have the same basic PC technology on the same ambulatory adult population. Both devices display ECG waveforms of the transmitted signals and include a central monitoring Both devices display ECO waveromis of the transmitter and a receiver. Both devices station, one of multiple receivers and connection to a local area network. Additionally, both devices can be used to develop, edit and produce reports of patient data acquired during them rehabilitation process. Both devices do not require sterilization. Mechanical safety, aside from rehability, is not applicable for either device. Stability, electromechanical compatibility, electrical stability, is not applicable for the proposed device was performed in accordance with safety and themal salely testing of the proposed as reading Equipment - Part 1: General applicable sections of ILC 00001 Fulle 110 or applicable for either device. Both devices are Requirements For Salety. Chininear salety is not op both devices are similar and generated data used in identical allatomical sites. Thanks actives. The primary difference between the is identical. 10th2lig energy is not cinner of on the TeleRehab™ 2004 includes a new digital I elekendom. 2004 and 113 predicate to the differences between the TeleRehab™ 2004 and the receiver for signal lectpublic "None of mact on the safety and efficacy of the proposed device. predicate TeleKenab device have an impact on the sames which are beyond the TeleRehalt™ While the Quinton device has additional marcasions when viewed as a Radiofrequency Physiological 2004, they share the same multanons for use as with Now of the TeleRehab™ 2004 Signal Transmitter and Receiver pursually powered, prescription devices with the same intended and Q-Tel RMS predicate are electrically porters) data and conditioning the ECG signal so that it can be transmitted by radio waves to a workstation. They incorporate the same basic operational principles, have the same basic performance characteristics, are used in a clinical or hospital environment, and utilize the same basic PC technology on the same and include and include a hospital environment, and unize the same base i & ansmitted signals and include a central monitoring station, one or several workstation computers, a signal transmitter and a central monitoring station, one of multiple receivers and connection to a local area newving and riguing Optional workstations may be comected to both systems via network for entering and viewing Optional workstations may be comiceled to both devices can be used to develop. patient demographic and renab sessori data. 770 developilitation process. Both devices edit and produce reports of patient data acquired arade electrode and patient lead.
do not require sterilization, and utilize a biocompatible medical is not opticable do not require stermization, and united a broompanse and from stability, is not applicable that come into contact with the patient. "Menhamed safety and themal safety and themal safety and themalicable for either device. Stability, electionicelians was performed in accordance with applicable testing of the proposed and predically of the may be new le part it General Requirements sections of IEC 60001-1 and IEC 00001-1 a measure in the property. Both devices are used in
{2}------------------------------------------------
identical anatomical sites. Human factors for both devices are similar and generated data is identical analy and emit ionizing energy.
The primary difference between the TeleRehab™ 2004 and the Quinton Q-Tel RMS device is I he primary difference between the Telefonal and optional ECG features for other than the intended that the Quinton device includes auditional and options 2004 and the TeleRehab™ 2004 and the use for TeleKenab™ 2004. None of the Gifterences connects of the device when used as the TeleRehab™ 2004 is intended.
### Device Description:
Device Description: ScottCare TeleKellaborm 2004 Cardiopannonial (outpatient) environment). It is used
device intended for non-diagnostic use in a remote or in-hospital (outpation) of coursely t device intended for non-thaghosic use in a remote transmitted via radio frequency to a
to acquire and condition the ECG signal so that it can be seriest, of the heat, of workstation. The telemetry capable system measures the electrical activity of the heart of workstation. The telement capable system inteasedial or pumonary rehabilitation, or other ambulatory adults undergoning presentous monitoring such as Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) patients.
### Performance Data:
Performance Data:
The ScottCare TeleRehab™ 2004 Cardiopulmonary Monitoring System was tested to and meets the requirements of the following standards.
- > IEC 60601-1 Safety of Medical Electrical Equipment Part 1: General Requirements
- > IEC 60601-1-2:2004/EN61000-4 Generic Emissions Standard
- > EN 55011 Class B Product Specific Emissions
- > EN61000-4-2 Electrostatic Discharge
- > EN61000-4-3 Radiated Susceptibility
- > EN61000-4-4 Electrical Fast Transient Burst
- > EN61000-4-5 Surge
- > EN61000-4-6 Conducted Susceptibility
- > EN61000-4-8 Magnetics
- > EN61000-3-2 Harmonic Current
- > EN61000-3-3 Voltage Fluctuations and Flicker
- > EN61000-3-5 Voltage Fidetuations and I neness and alarms (applicable parts only)
## Substantial Equivalence:
Substantial Equivalence:
The performance data shows that ScottCare TeleRehabTM Cordios Poblioging The performance data shows that ScottCare TeleRehab System for Cardiac Relabilitation System is substantially equivalent to the Bootecare a provent system (K041607) and is safe for intended use.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three wing segments, symbolizing care and protection. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle.
Public Health Service
APR 1 3 2005
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
ScottCare Corporation c/o Mr. Ned Devine Entela, Inc. 3033 Madison Avenue SE Grand Rapids, MI 49458
Re: K050778 KU50778
Trade Name: ScottCare TeleRehab™ 2004 Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation System (TeleRehab™ 2004) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.2910 Regulation Name: Radiofrequency Physiological Signal Transmitter and Receiver Regulatory Class: II (two) Product Code: DRG Dated: Undated Received: March 28, 2005
Dear Mr. Devine:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device we nave reviewed your bocation in (a) the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate for use stated in the encreativent of the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to conniner of rial to rial) 2011-07-12 in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, de vices that have been require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). and Cosmeter Free (110) that as device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The I ou may, mererere, mains of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of general controls provisions or ractice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it If your device is elassified (soo as rols. Existing major regulations affecting your device can may be subject to bach additions, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Page 2 -- Mr. Ned Devine
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean Please be advised that 1271 3 issuates or a case ice complies with other requirements of the Act that I Dri has made a acternations administered by other Federal agencies. You must of ally reactal statutes and regarations and limited to: registration and listing (21 Comply with an the Fice orequirements, as a manufacturing practice requirements as set CFK Fart 807), labeling (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic form in the quality systems (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. product radiation control provisions (Section ) our device as described in your Section 510(k) This letter will anow you to ough manieang your antial equivalence of your device to a legally premarket notheadon: "The PDF Intelling of casion for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please If you desire spochie at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, Colliati the Office of Compilance wa (21CFR Part 807.97) you may obtain. Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Other general information on your responsional and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Blyminma for
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
# 510(k) Number (if known): TBD
Cardiopulmonary TeleRehab™ 2004 ScottCare Name: Device Rehabilitation System (TeleRehab™ 2004)
Indications For Use: This device is intended to acquire and condition the Indications For 'Ose. This device is include transmitted via radio frequency
ECG signal from a patient so that it can be transmitted via a hospital ECG signal from a patient so the it var it var setter to a workstation in a hospital (WMTF) while a Stickman telomen's and analyzed. This device is a or clinical selling where the ECC is as a sees monitoring while for use with anibulatory addit pattersting the data output from the undergoing cardiac or pullionary renarmany remains of the patients' progress through rehabilitation or other monitoring. Patients patients - progress - through - remaintain- - 1 information can be entered via demographies, exercise protocor hire wireless input devices or automatically a variety of connifereially available weeks. A database can be created for use with an Outcomes program.
Prescription Use _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ X AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Blummen
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Cardiovascular Devices 510(k) Number KI) 50777
Page 1 of 1
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.