XPECT INFLUENZA A/B

K031565 · Remel, Inc. · PSZ · Jul 17, 2003 · Microbiology

Device Facts

Record IDK031565
Device NameXPECT INFLUENZA A/B
ApplicantRemel, Inc.
Product CodePSZ · Microbiology
Decision DateJul 17, 2003
DecisionSESE
Submission TypeTraditional
Regulation21 CFR 866.3328
Device ClassClass 2

Indications for Use

REMEL's Xpect™ Influenza A/B is a rapid in vitro immunochromatographic test for the direct, qualitative detection of influenza A and influenza B viral antigen (nucleoprotein) from nasal wash, nasal swab, and throat swab specimens from symptomatic patients. The test is intended as an aid in the rapid diagnosis of influenza A and influenza B viral infections. Negative tests should be confirmed by cell culture.

Device Story

Xpect™ Influenza A/B is a rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic assay; detects influenza A and B nucleoprotein antigens in nasal wash, nasal swab, or throat swab specimens. Patient sample is diluted and applied to a sample well; capillary action moves the sample across membrane strips. Viral antigens bind to conjugated antibodies; antibody-antigen-antibody complexes are captured at test lines (T) to form visible lines. Control lines (C) confirm proper test function. Results are interpreted visually by healthcare providers. Negative results require confirmation by cell culture. Device aids in rapid diagnosis of influenza infections.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical trial at three U.S. sites (children's hospital, university hospital, reference lab) compared Xpect™ Flu A/B to cell culture. Overall sensitivity: 92.2% (71/77) for influenza A, 97.8% (45/46) for influenza B. Overall specificity: 100% for both. Discrepant analysis via RT-PCR performed on available samples. Analytical sensitivity evaluated using 12 influenza strains. Cross-reactivity tested against 36 microorganisms; no cross-reactivity observed. Interfering substances (blood, mouthwash, throat drops, nasal sprays, common OTC medications) showed no interference.

Technological Characteristics

Immunochromatographic membrane assay. Device incorporates separate membrane strips for influenza A and B. Qualitative detection via antibody-antigen-antibody complex captured on membrane. Visual readout via colored particles. Standalone test device.

Indications for Use

Indicated for symptomatic patients requiring rapid qualitative detection of influenza A and B viral nucleoprotein antigens from nasal wash, nasal swab, or throat swab specimens. Aid in diagnosis; negative results require cell culture confirmation.

Regulatory Classification

Identification

An influenza virus antigen detection test system is a device intended for the qualitative detection of influenza viral antigens directly from clinical specimens in patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection. The test aids in the diagnosis of influenza infection and provides epidemiological information on influenza. Due to the propensity of the virus to mutate, new strains emerge over time which may potentially affect the performance of these devices. Because influenza is highly contagious and may lead to an acute respiratory tract infection causing severe illness and even death, the accuracy of these devices has serious public health implications.

Special Controls

*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) The device's sensitivity and specificity performance characteristics or positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement, for each specimen type claimed in the intended use of the device, must meet one of the following two minimum clinical performance criteria: (i) For devices evaluated as compared to an FDA-cleared nucleic acid based-test or other currently appropriate and FDA accepted comparator method other than correctly performed viral culture method: (A) The positive percent agreement estimate for the device when testing for influenza A and influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 80 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 70 percent. (B) The negative percent agreement estimate for the device when testing for influenza A and influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 95 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 90 percent. (ii) For devices evaluated as compared to correctly performed viral culture method as the comparator method: (A) The sensitivity estimate for the device when testing for influenza A must be at the point estimate of at least 90 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 80 percent. The sensitivity estimate for the device when testing for influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 80 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 70 percent. (B) The specificity estimate for the device when testing for influenza A and influenza B must be at the point estimate of at least 95 percent with a lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval that is greater than or equal to 90 percent. (2) When performing testing to demonstrate the device meets the requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a currently appropriate and FDA accepted comparator method must be used to establish assay performance in clinical studies. (3) Annual analytical reactivity testing of the device must be performed with contemporary influenza strains. This annual analytical reactivity testing must meet the following criteria: (i) The appropriate strains to be tested will be identified by FDA in consultation with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and sourced from CDC or an FDA-designated source. If the annual strains are not available from CDC, FDA will identify an alternative source for obtaining the requisite strains. (ii) The testing must be conducted according to a standardized protocol considered and determined by FDA to be acceptable and appropriate. (iii) By July 31 of each calendar year, the results of the last 3 years of annual analytical reactivity testing must be included as part of the device's labeling. If a device has not been on the market long enough for 3 years of annual analytical reactivity testing to have been conducted since the device received marketing authorization from FDA, then the results of every annual analytical reactivity testing since the device received marketing authorization from FDA must be included. The results must be presented as part of the device's labeling in a tabular format, which includes the detailed information for each virus tested as described in the certificate of authentication, either by: (A) Placing the results directly in the device's § 809.10(b) of this chapter compliant labeling that physically accompanies the device in a separate section of the labeling where the analytical reactivity testing data can be found; or (B) In the device's label or in other labeling that physically accompanies the device, prominently providing a hyperlink to the manufacturer's public Web site where the analytical reactivity testing data can be found. The manufacturer's home page, as well as the primary part of the manufacturer's Web site that discusses the device, must provide a prominently placed hyperlink to the Web page containing this information and must allow unrestricted viewing access. (4) If one of the actions listed at section 564(b)(1)(A)-(D) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act occurs with respect to an influenza viral strain, or if the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines, under section 319(a) of the Public Health Service Act, that a disease or disorder presents a public health emergency, or that a public health emergency otherwise exists, with respect to an influenza viral strain: (i) Within 30 days from the date that FDA notifies manufacturers that characterized viral samples are available for test evaluation, the manufacturer must have testing performed on the device with those viral samples in accordance with a standardized protocol considered and determined by FDA to be acceptable and appropriate. The procedure and location of testing may depend on the nature of the emerging virus. (ii) Within 60 days from the date that FDA notifies manufacturers that characterized viral samples are available for test evaluation and continuing until 3 years from that date, the results of the influenza emergency analytical reactivity testing, including the detailed information for the virus tested as described in the certificate of authentication, must be included as part of the device's labeling in a tabular format, either by: (A) Placing the results directly in the device's § 809.10(b) of this chapter compliant labeling that physically accompanies the device in a separate section of the labeling where analytical reactivity testing data can be found, but separate from the annual analytical reactivity testing results; or (B) In a section of the device's label or in other labeling that physically accompanies the device, prominently providing a hyperlink to the manufacturer's public Web site where the analytical reactivity testing data can be found. The manufacturer's home page, as well as the primary part of the manufacturer's Web site that discusses the device, must provide a prominently placed hyperlink to the Web page containing this information and must allow unrestricted viewing access.

Predicate Devices

Submission Summary (Full Text)

{0} 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY A. 510(k) Number: k031565 B. Analyte: Influenza A/B nucleoprotein antigens C. Type of Test: Rapid Immunochromatographic test D. Applicant: Remel, Inc. E. Proprietary and Established Names: Xpect™ Influenza A/B F. Regulatory Information: 1. Regulation section: 21 CFR 866.3330; Influenza virus serological reagents 2. Classification: Class I 3. Product Code: GNX; Antigens, CF, Influenza Virus A, B, C. 4. Panel: Microbiology (83) G. Intended Use: 1. Intended use(s): REMEL's Xpect™ Influenza A/B is a rapid *in vitro* immunochromatographic test for the direct, qualitative detection of influenza A and influenza B viral antigen (nucleoprotein) from nasal wash, nasal swab, and throat swab specimens from symptomatic patients. The test is intended as an aid in the rapid diagnosis of influenza A and influenza B viral infections. Negative tests should be confirmed by cell culture 2. Indication(s) for use: REMEL's Xpect™ Flu A/B is a rapid *in vitro* immunochromatographic test for the direct, qualitative detection of influenza A and influenza B viral antigen (nucleoprotein) from nasal wash, nasal swab, and throat swab specimens from symptomatic patients. The test is intended as an aid in the rapid diagnosis of influenza A and influenza B viral infections. Negative tests should be confirmed by cell culture. 3. Special condition for use statement(s): 4. Special instrument Requirements: H. Device Description: The Xpect™ Influenza A/B is a chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of influenza A and influenza B viral antigens. The test device {1} incorporates separate membrane strips for influenza A and for influenza B. To perform the test, the patient specimen is diluted and added to the sample well of the device. The mixture moves along the membranes by capillary action. If present, influenza A or B viral antigens in the patient sample bind anti-influenza A or B conjugated antibodies. A visible line forms as a complex of antibody-antigen-antibody coated colored particles is captured in the test region (T). Antibody coated colored particles not bound at the test line are later captured in the control region (C) containing goat anti-mouse antibody. A visible line will always appear in the control region indicating that the test is working properly. The presence of a control line combined with the absence of a visible test line is interpreted as a negative test result. Page 2 of 4 # I. Substantial Equivalence Information: 1. Predicate device name(s): BD Directigen Flu A+B 2. Predicate K number(s): k001364 3. Comparison with predicate: | Similarities | | | | --- | --- | --- | | Item | Device | Predicate | | Procedure | Qualitative; Influenza A and B viral antigens with differentiation. | Qualitative; Influenza A and B viral antigens with differentiation. | | Differences | | | | Item | Device | Predicate | | Assay | Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) membrane assay | Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) membrane assay | | Specimen Type | Nasal wash, nasal swab, and throat swab specimens | Nasopharyngeal wash, nasopharyngeal aspirate, nasopharyngeal swab, lower nasal swab, throat swab and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens | # J. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable): # K. Test Principle: Immunochromatographic Test # L. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable): 1. Analytical performance: a. Precision/Reproducibility: Reproducibility testing was conducted at four sites Ninety-nine percent of the 96 samples tested produced the expected result. b. Linearity/assay reportable range: {2} Page 3 of 4 c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method): d. Detection limit: Table: Analytical Sensitivity | Influenza Strain | Type | Detection Limit CEID_{50} | | --- | --- | --- | | A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1) | A | 8.9 x 10^{3} | | A/Fort Monmouth/1/47 (H1N1) | A | 7.9 x 10^{3} | | A/New Jersey/8/76 (H1N1) | A | 8.9 x 10^{3} | | A/Hong Kong/8/68 (H3N2) | A | 2.8 x 10^{3} | | A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2) | A | 8.9 x 10^{2} | | A/Port Chalmers/1/73 (H3N2) | A | 4.0 x 10^{3} | | B/Lee/40 | B | 7.9 x 10^{5} | | B/Allen/45 | B | 4 | | B/Maryland/1/59 | B | 6 | | B/GL/1739/54 | B | 8.9 x 10^{3} | | B/Taiwan/2/62 | B | 3 | | B/Hong Kong/5/72 | B | 1.58 x 10^{2} | e. Analytical specificity: Thirty-six microorganisms were evaluated with the Xpect™ Influenza A/B test. No cross-reactivity was observed for influenza A or influenza B. f. Assay cut-off: 2. Comparison studies: a. Method comparison with predicate device: Clinical Accuracy: Comparison studies were conducted at 3 sites. For all specimens evaluated, the overall sensitivity of the Xpect™ Influenza A/B test when compared to culture was 92.2% (71/77) for influenza A and 97.8% (45/46) for influenza B. The overall specificity was 100% for both influenza A (314/314) and influenza B (345/345). Sample types Nasal Wash/Aspirate (n=239) Influenza A 92.5% Sensitivity (37/40) 100% Specificity (199/199) Influenza B 100% Sensitivity; (36/36) 100% Specificity (203/203) Throat Swabs (n=30) Influenza A 100% Sensitivity (10/10) 100% Specificity (20/20) Influenza B 100% Sensitivity; (4/4) 100% Specificity (26/26) {3} Page 4 of 4 Nasal Swab (nasopharyngeal swab; nasal swab) (n=122) Influenza A 88.9% Sensitivity (24/27) 100% Specificity (95/95) b. Matrix comparison: Influenza B 83.3% Sensitivity; (5/6) 100% Specificity (116/116) 3. Clinical studies: a. Clinical sensitivity: b. Clinical specificity: c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b are not applicable): 4. Clinical cut-off: 5. Expected values/Reference range: M. Conclusion: The Performance characteristics reported here for the device indicate that it is comparable to the other such test kits currently in the market.
Innolitics

Panel 1

/
Ready

Predicate graph will load when search results are available.

Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.

PDF viewer will load when search results are available.

Loading panels...

Select an item from Submissions

Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.

Section Matches

Results will appear here.

Product Code Matches

Results will appear here.

Special Control Matches

Results will appear here.

Loading collections...