5.0 MM DIAMETER POLYAXIAL SCREWS (MOSS MIAMI 6.35MM SYSTEM)
Applicant
Depuyacromed
Product Code
KWP · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Aug 27, 2002
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
When used as a posterior, noncervical hook, and/or sacral/iliac screw fixation system, or as an anterior, thoracic/lumbar screw fixation system, the Moss Miami Spinal system is intended to treat scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis, fracture, loss of stability due to tumor, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, a previously failed fusion surgery or degenerative disc disease (i.e., discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies). When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the noncervical spine in skeletally mature patients, the Moss Miami Spinal System is indicated for degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The Moss Miami Spinal System is also indicated for pedicle screw fixation in skeletally mature patients with severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the L5 - S1 vertebral joint, having fusions with autogenous bone graft, with the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (levels of pedicle screw fixation are L3 - S1), and for whom the device system is intended to be removed after solid fusion is attained.
Device Story
5.0mm diameter polyaxial screws for Moss Miami 6.35mm spinal system; used for posterior/anterior spinal fixation. Device provides mechanical stabilization of vertebral segments to facilitate fusion. Operated by surgeons in clinical/OR settings. Screws are implanted into pedicles or sacral/iliac regions to anchor spinal constructs. Provides structural support for patients with spinal deformities or instability; aids in achieving solid fusion. Output is physical stabilization of the spine.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Data submitted to characterize the mechanical performance of the 5.0mm diameter polyaxial screws.
Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring noncervical spinal fixation for degenerative spondylolisthesis with neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, failed fusion, or severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3-4) at L5-S1.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of an alloy, such as stainless steel, that consists of various hooks and a posteriorly placed compression or distraction rod. The device is implanted, usually across three adjacent vertebrae, to straighten and immobilize the spine to allow bone grafts to unite and fuse the vertebrae together. The device is used primarily in the treatment of scoliosis (a lateral curvature of the spine), but it also may be used in the treatment of fracture or dislocation of the spine, grades 3 and 4 of spondylolisthesis (a dislocation of the spinal column), and lower back syndrome.
{0}------------------------------------------------
## IX. 510(k) Summary
| SUBMITTER: | DePuy AcroMed, Inc.<br>325 Paramount Drive<br>Raynham, MA 02767 |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CONTACT PERSON: | Lisa A. Gilman |
| DATE PREPARED: | August 2, 2002 |
| CLASSIFICATION NAME: | Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Interlaminal<br>Orthosis, Spinal Pedicle Fixation |
| PROPRIETARY NAME: | 5.0mm Diameter Polyaxial Screws for the Moss Miami<br>6.35mm System |
| PREDICATE DEVICES: | Moss Miami Spinal System (K983583, K992168 &<br>K002607) |
| INTENDED USE: | When used as a posterior, noncervical hook, and/or<br>sacral/iliac screw fixation system, or as an anterior,<br>thoracic/lumbar screw fixation system, the Moss<br>Miami Spinal system is intended to treat scoliosis,<br>kyphosis and lordosis, fracture, loss of stability due to<br>tumor, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, a previously<br>failed fusion surgery or degenerative disc disease<br>(i.e., discogenic back pain with degeneration of the<br>disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic<br>studies).<br><br>When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the<br>noncervical spine in skeletally mature patients, the<br>Moss Miami Spinal System is indicated for<br>degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective<br>evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture,<br>dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and |
1/2
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Moss Miami Spinal System is also indicated for pedicle screw fixation in skeletally mature patients with severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the L5 - S1 vertebral joint, having fusions with autogenous bone graft, with the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (levels of pedicle screw fixation are L3 - S1), and for whom the device system is intended to be removed after solid fusion is attained.
K (12262
- Manufactured from ASTM F-136 implant grade MATERIALS: titanium alloy, ASTM F-1314 implant grade stainless steel, and ASTM F-138 implant grade stainless steel.
## PERFORMANCE DATA:
Data were submitted to characterize the 5.0mm diameter Polyaxial Screws (Moss Miami 6.35mm System.)
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of the department's name encircling a symbol. The symbol features three stylized human profiles facing right, stacked on top of each other. The profiles are rendered in a simple, flowing line, creating a sense of unity and connection.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
AUG 2 7 2002
Mr. Frank Maas Manager, Regulatory Affairs DePuy Acromed, Inc.
325 Paramount Drive
Raynham, Massachusetts 02767
K022623 Re:
Trade/Device Name: 5.0mm Diameter Polyaxial Screws (Moss Miami 6.35mm System) Regulatory Number: 21 CFR 888.3070, 21 CFR 888.3050 Regulation Name: Pedicle Screw Spinal System, Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MNH, MNI, KWP Dated: August 2, 2002 Received: August 7, 2002
Dear Mr. Maas:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Frank Maas
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 21 CFR Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97), Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours.
L. Mark N. Millhussen
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use III.
510(k) Number (if known): _ KO22623___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5.0mm diameter Polyaxial Screws (Moss Miami 6.35mm Device Name: System)
## Indications For Use:
When used as a posterior, noncervical hook, and/or sacral/iliac screw fixation system, or as an anterior, thoracic/lumbar screw fixation system, the Moss Miami Spinal system is intended to treat scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis, fracture, loss of stability due to tumor, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, a previously failed fusion surgery or degenerative disc disease (i.e., discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies).
When used as a pedicle screw fixation system of the noncervical spine in skeletally mature patients, the Moss Miami Spinal System is indicated for degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).
The Moss Miami Spinal System is also indicated for pedicle screw fixation in skeletally mature patients with severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the L5 - S1 vertebral joint, having fusions with autogenous bone graft, with the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (levels of pedicle screw fixation are L3 - S1), and for whom the device system is intended to be removed after solid fusion is attained.
(Please do not write below this line - continue on another page if needed)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
| Prescription Use: | OR Over-The-Counter Use: |
|----------------------|--------------------------|
| (Per 21 CFR 801.109) | |
for Mark N Millanzo
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of General, Restorative
and Neurological Devices
| 510(k) Number | K022623 |
|---------------|---------|
|---------------|---------|
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.
