K022294 · Im Systems · MNR · Apr 25, 2003 · Anesthesiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K022294
Device Name
APNEACHECK
Applicant
Im Systems
Product Code
MNR · Anesthesiology
Decision Date
Apr 25, 2003
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 868.2375
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The SleepCheck is a small monitor designed to assess nasal and oral airflow. Apnea breathing events are counted based on a reduction in airflow. The device is intended for use as a screening device to determine the need for clinical diagnosis and evaluation by polysomnography based on the patient's score.
Device Story
SleepCheck is a pager-sized, battery-powered monitor for sleep apnea screening. Patient self-applies device at home, clipping it to nightshirt and placing an air cannula sensor under nostrils/above lip. Device captures nasal and oral airflow via pressure-based sensor. Microprocessor filters and digitizes airflow signals at 10 samples/second. Device detects apnea events defined as airflow reduction for 10+ seconds. LCD displays total apnea count, Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), and a dynamic bar graph for real-time breathing verification. Upon waking, patient returns device to physician. Physician reviews LCD readout to assess disordered breathing and determine if further clinical polysomnography is required. Benefits include convenient, non-tethered home screening for sleep-disordered breathing.
Clinical Evidence
Six clinical studies (111 subjects, 151 sleep nights) conducted at home and in sleep labs, sponsored by NIH. Validated against gold-standard polysomnography (PSG). Results showed high agreement with PSG: sensitivity 1.00, specificity 0.88, and correlation (r) to PSG of 0.99. Comparator SleepStrip reported sensitivity 0.97, specificity 0.67, and correlation 0.71.
Indicated for patients requiring screening for sleep-disordered breathing to determine the need for clinical diagnosis and evaluation by polysomnography.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A breathing (ventilatory) frequency monitor is a device intended to measure or monitor a patient's respiratory rate. The device may provide an audible or visible alarm when the respiratory rate, averaged over time, is outside operator settable alarm limits. This device does not include the apnea monitor classified in § 868.2377.
{0}------------------------------------------------
## APR 2 5 2003
"SleepCheck" 510(k) Premarket Notification, April 17, 2003 Individual Monitoring Systems, Inc.
## 510(k) SUMMARY:
K022294
"This summary of 510 (k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92."
#### Submitter's Name and Address:
David T. Krausman, Ph.D.
Individual Monitoring Systems, Inc. (DBA IM Systems)
1055 Taylor Avenue, Suite 300
Baltimore, MD 21286
Phone: 410-296-7723, Fax: 410-321-0643
Contact Person: David T. Krausman, Ph.D.
#### Date Summary was prepared:
April 17, 2003
#### Name of Device:
Trade Name: SleepCheck
Common Name: Sleep Apnea Screening Device
Classification Name: Ventilatory Effort Recorder
## ldentification of predicate device:
Number: K002135, "SleepStrip", Influent Ltd.
Product Code: 73 MNR
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Statement of Intended Use:
The SleepCheck is intended for use in monitoring nasal and oral airflow. The device is intended for use as a prescreening tool to determine the need for clinical diagnosis and evaluation by polysomnography based on the patient's test score.
#### Description of Device:
The SleepCheck is a pager-sized monitor that clips onto the patient's nightshirt. The monitor utilizes an air cannula sensor to capture the patient's nasal and oral airflow. The sensor cannula, containing 3 airflow ports, is placed under the nostrils, above the lip and held in place around the ears with a lanyard. The unit has an LCD readout that displays the total number of apneas and the apnealhypopnea index (AHI). The LCD also flashes a warning if the sensor is improperly applied or displaced. The LCD also provides a dynamic bar graph that displays the breathing pattern. As the patient inhales and exhales, the bar moves back and forth, verifying proper sensor application and monitor operation. When breathing decreases or is interrupted for 10 seconds or longer, this event is considered an apnea episode and is tallied on the LCD readout. The patient self-applies the unit before going to bed and wears the unit through the night. Upon waking, the patient will take off the unit and return it to the physician. The physician will check the LCD to learn the number of apneas and the rate of apnea events (AHI) that occurred throughout the night. The technical validity of the test is also indicated.
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Comparison Inventory:
| Function: | SleepCheck | SleepStrip |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | Monitor sleep apnea events | Monitor sleep apnea events |
| Method of Measurement | Airflow sensor-pressure | Airflow sensor-thermal |
| Sensor placement site | Rests over the lip, under the nose | Rests over the lip, under the nose |
| Sensor elements | 3 prongs - two nasal, one oral | 3 prongs - two nasal, one oral |
| Measured variable | Oral and nasal airflow | Oral and nasal airflow |
| Sensor attachment | Air-cannula lanyard style | Stick-on adhesive-backed |
| Display type | Liquid crystal display element | Chemical display element |
| Breathing Indicator | Moving-bar display | Blinking-light display |
| Signal loss indicator | Yes, on display | Yes, on display |
| Apnea detection counter | 254 per hour maximum | 126 per hour maximum |
| Index scoring | AHI per sleep period | AHI per sleep period |
| Event score | Total apnea event count | AHI x 5 = total apnea event count |
| Display function | Numeric readout - decimal counter | Numeric readout - binary counter |
| Sleep night use | Single night monitoring | Single night monitoring |
| Maximum run-time | 9 hours | 5 hours |
| Controller | Microprocessor | Microprocessor |
| Airflow signal conditioning | Filtered and digitized | Filtered and digitized |
| Sampling method | Analog to digital conversion | Analog to digital conversion |
| Sample rate | 10 per second continuous | 10 per second continuous |
| Apnea detection criterion | Signal decrease 10 sec. or longer | Signal decrease 10 sec. or longer |
| Monitor application | Patient self-applies | Patient self-applies |
| Download | None - display readout only | None - display readout only |
| Physical Characteristics | Small, non-tether monitor | Small, non-tether monitor |
| Power | Alkaline battery | Lithium battery |
| Clinical Studies | Clinically tested against PSG | Clinically tested against PSG |
| | Sensor | FDA Number and Date |
| SleepCheck | Pro-Tech model #1294 | #K982293 July 13, 1998 |
| | Braebon model #0589/0588 | #K984431 Dec. 30, 1998 |
| SleepStrip | EPM EasyFlow | #K922112 Dec 7, 1992 |
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Comparable characteristics of the SleepCheck and SleepStrip devices:
The SleepCheck and the predicate device SleepStrip (#K002135) manufactured by Influent, Ltd., are substantially equivalent in technology, function, and intended use: both wireless breathing monitors are indicated to screen patients for sleep disordered breathing; both devices use airflow sensors to detect nasal and oral airflow; both use a microprocessor to analyze airflow; both devices measure disordered breathing based on reduced air-flow; both devices use a low-power battery; and both devices have a display to show the recorded results to a physician. The major functions of both devices are to demonstrate on the display the amount of disordered breathing the patient experienced; both tools are intended as a screening device. Both the SleepCheck and SleepStrip devices have been validated in clinical studies using polysomnography.
The SleepCheck has one minor variation with respect to its predicate device: the SleepCheck airflow sensors are FDA Cleared single-use units (Pro-Tech FDA#K982293 - model #1294; or Braebon FDA#K984431 - model #0589/0588), while the SleepStrip airflow sensor is an FDA Cleared singleuse thermistor unit (EPM #K9221120). The airflow signals produced by these sensors are substantially equivalent for their intended use. Please see Table 1 for a comparison of the components of the SleepCheck and the predicate device SleepStrip.
Table 1: Component Characteristics of SleepCheck & Predicate Device
Based on the information provided above and herein, the SleepCheck is substantially equivalent to the SleepStrip with respect to intended use, technological characteristics, and performance.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Biocompatibility characteristics of SleepCheck
Two components of the SleepCheck contact the wearer for the sleep period (usually 1-9 hours). Both components have been FDA cleared. The first component is the airflow sensor. The SleepCheck requires the use of either a Pro-Tech or Braebon airflow sensor (see Table 2). Both airflow sensors are clearly marked as single-use components. The second component is the casing. The ABS plastic casing of the SleepCheck is identical to the ABS plastic casing of the PAM-RL as it was approved in #K010997. Oct. 15, 2001 (see Table 2), in formulation, processing, and sterilization, and no other chemicals have been added. No adjustments have been made to either the airflow sensors or to the casing.
Table 2.0: FDA-Cleared SleepCheck Components
| Part | Title | FDA Number and Date |
|-----------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|
| Airflow Sensors | Pro-Tech model #1294 | #K982293 July 13, 1998 |
| Airflow Sensors | Braebon model #0589/0588 | #K984431 Dec. 30, 1998 |
| Casing | PAM-RL casing | #K010997, Oct. 15, 2001 |
#### Assessment of SleepCheck Performance Data:
In total, six clinical studies were conducted to validated the accuracy of the apnea detection technology and the functionally of the SleepCheck device against the gold standard PSG. These studies consisted of 111 sleep tests totaling 151 sleep nights. All studies were sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (#N43-NS-5-2328 – NINDS; #N43-NS-8-2328 – NINDS; #1R43HL65166-01A1 – NIHLB). The results of these studies were both submitted to NIH and presented at various National Sleep Disorder Conferences. All studies conducted both at-home and in the sleep laboratory indicated a highly positive agreement with full PSG, with high sensitivity and specificity. See Table 3. Based on these results, the apnea detection technology provided by SleepCheck measuring single oral/nasal channel airflow is substantially equivalent in performance to the gold standard PSG for the intended use as a prescreening tool to determine the need for clinical diagnosis and evaluation by polysomnography based on the patient's test score.
{5}------------------------------------------------
| | SleepCheck1 | Sleep Strip2 |
|--------------------------|-------------|--------------|
| Sensitivity: | 1.00 | .97 |
| Specificity | .88 | .67 |
| r to PSG (gold standard) | .99 | .71 |
Table 3.0: Performance Characteristics of SleepCheck & Predicate Device
'Spiro et al. (2002) Sleep: 25(supplement), A275. 2 Lavie et al (2000) Sleep: 23(Supplement 2), A7.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the top half of the circle. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines beneath them, possibly representing water or movement.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
APR 2 5 2003
David T. Krausman, Ph.D. Individual Monitoring Systems, Incorporated 1055 Taylor Avenue, Suite 300 Baltimore, Maryland 21286
Re: K022294
Trade/Device Name: SleepCheck Regulation Number: 868.2375 Regulation Name: Ventilatory Effort Recorder Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MNR Dated: January 31, 2003 Received: February 10, 2003
Dear Mr. Krausman:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition. FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 - Mr. Krausman
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section. 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4646. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Patrice Cimentiffe
Susan Runner, DDS, MA Interim Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
Individual Monitoring Systems, Inc. "SleepCheck" 510(k) Premarket Notification, April 17, 2003
# K022294 Intended Use:
The SleepCheck is a small monitor designed to assess nasal and oral airflow. Apnea breathing events are counted based on a reduction in airflow. The device is intended for use as a screening device to determine the need for clinical diagnosis and evaluation by polysomnography based on the patient's score.
Prescription Use Only /
Pabian Cucciaste
(Division Sign-Off)
510(k) Number: K022294
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.