K013447 · Scien'Tx USA, Inc. · KWP · Jan 15, 2002 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K013447
Device Name
ISOBAR SPINAL SYSTEM
Applicant
Scien'Tx USA, Inc.
Product Code
KWP · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Jan 15, 2002
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The ISOBAR Spinal System is a pedicle screw system intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). As a pedicle screw system, the ISOBAR Spinal System is intended for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grade 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebrae in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion. When used as a posterior, non-cervical, non-pedicle screw fixation system, the ISOBAR Spinal System is intended for hook fixation from T1 to the ilium/sacrum. The non-pedicle screw indications are spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history patient history and radiographic studies), deformities (scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, trauma (fracture or dislocation) and/or previous failed fusion surgery.
Device Story
ISOBAR Spinal System comprises pedicle screws, rods, nuts, crosslink members, and hooks; provides spinal segment immobilization and stabilization. Used as adjunct to fusion for acute/chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Implanted by surgeons in clinical settings. System components provide mechanical fixation to stabilize vertebrae; supports bone graft healing. Benefits include stabilization of spinal segments in patients with severe deformities or degenerative conditions.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Bench testing only; static and fatigue compression testing performed per ASTM F1717-96.
Technological Characteristics
Components manufactured from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) conforming to ASTM F136. System includes pedicle screws, rods, nuts, crosslink members, and hooks. Mechanical fixation device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring spinal immobilization/stabilization as an adjunct to fusion. Treats thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine conditions: degenerative spondylolisthesis with neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, failed fusion (pseudarthrosis), severe spondylolisthesis (Grade 3-4 at L5-S1), and degenerative disc disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of an alloy, such as stainless steel, that consists of various hooks and a posteriorly placed compression or distraction rod. The device is implanted, usually across three adjacent vertebrae, to straighten and immobilize the spine to allow bone grafts to unite and fuse the vertebrae together. The device is used primarily in the treatment of scoliosis (a lateral curvature of the spine), but it also may be used in the treatment of fracture or dislocation of the spine, grades 3 and 4 of spondylolisthesis (a dislocation of the spinal column), and lower back syndrome.
{0}------------------------------------------------
### 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness JAN 1 5 2002
Submitter's name: (1) Submitter's address: Contact telephone number: Contact person: Date summary prepared:
Common or usual name:
Classification name:
(2)
Scient'x Guvancourt, France (512) 834-6255 Joanna Droege October 8, 2001
K013447
page 1 of 1
ISOBAR Spinal System Additional Components Trade or proprietary device name: Pedicle screw spinal system Class II
- TSRHTM Spinal Implant System (K982990) Sofamor Legally marketed predicate device: (3) Danek and the ISOLA® Spinal System (K980485) DePuy AcroMed.
#### (4) Subject device description:
The ISOBAR Spinal System consists of pedicle screws, rods, nuts, crosslink members and hooks. It can be used for single or multiple level fixation. All components are manufactured from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) that conforms to ASTM F136.
#### Subject device intended use: (ર)
The ISOBAR Spinal System is a pedicle screw system intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion fracture. (pseudarthrosis).
As a pedicle screw system, the ISOBAR Spinal System is intended for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grade 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebrae in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion.
When used as a posterior, non-cervical, non-pedicle screw fixation system, the ISOBAR Spinal System is intended for hook fixation from T1 to the ilium/sacrum. The non-pedicle screw indications are spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history patient history and radiographic studies), deformities (scoliosis and lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, trauma (fracture or dislocation) and/or previous failed fusion surgery.
#### (6) Performance data:
The Food and Drug Administration have established no performance standards applicable to pedicle screw spinal systems. However, static and fatigue compression testing was performed according to ASTM F1717-96.
#### (7) Basis for substantial equivalence:
The ISOBAR Spinal System hook components are similar in design, materials and indications as the TSRH™ Spinal Implant System (K982990) Sofamor Danek and the ISOLA® Spinal System (K980485) DePuy AcroMed.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image is a seal for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal is circular and contains the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the edge. In the center of the seal is an image of an eagle with its wings spread.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JAN 1 5 2002
Scient'X c/o Ms. Joanna Droege Regulatory/QA Manager Encore Orthopedics 9800 Metric Boulevard Austin, Texas 78758
K013447 Re:
Trade Name: ISOBAR Spinal System Regulatory Number: 21 CFR 888.3070, 21 CFR 888.3070, 21 CFR 888.3050 Regulation Name: Pedicle Screw Spinal System, Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation Device System, Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis, Regulatory Class: II Product Code: MNH, MNI, KWP Dated: October 15, 2001 Received: October 17, 2001
Dear Ms. Droege:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced We have have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use above and we nave determined an marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the stated in the encrosure) to device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in enacificin date of the Modical Doviet Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general therefore, market the act received to equirements for annual registration, listing of devices, Controls provisions of the heading, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (Premarket Approval), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations (1 Child Kel Approvar), it may of Sallery of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to allecting your device can or route entination assumes compliance with the current Good 097. A substainmin'y equirement, as set forth in the Quality System Regulation (QS) for Manufacturing Praction regulation (21 CFR Part 820) and that, through periodic (QS) inspections, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will verify such assumptions. Failure to mspections, the Food and Drag result in regulatory action. In addition, FDA may publish comply with the Grill regarenting your device in the Federal Register. Please note: this response to your premarks contrise your submission does not affect any obligation you might have under sections 531 through 542 of the Act for devices under the Electronic Product Radiation Control provisions, or other Federal laws or regulations.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Joanna Droege
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597, or at its Internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Ro. Mark n. Millman
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{3}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known): _((_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
K013447
Device Name: ISOBAR Spinal System Additional Components
XO13447
page 1 of 1
Indications For Use:
# ISOBAR Spinal System Additional Components
## Indications For Use
System is a pedicle screw system intended to provide The ISOBAR Spinal immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).
As a pedicle screw system, the ISOBAR Spinal System is intended for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (Grade 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebrae in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion.
When used as a posterior, non-cervical, non-pedicle screw fixation system, the ISOBAR Spinal System is intended for hook fixation from T1 to the ilium/sacrum. The non-pedicle screw indications are spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease (as defined by back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history patient history and radiographic studies), deformities (scoliosis, kyphosis and lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, trauma (fracture or dislocation) and/or previous failed fusion surgery.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE (F NEEDED)
Concurrerice of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of General, Restorative
and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K013447
Prescription Use X OR Over-The-Counter Use *_
(per 21 CFR 801.109)
(Optional Format 1-2-96)*_
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.
