POLY PER-Q-CATH SINGLE LUMEN PICC CATHETER, MODEL 3143100; POLY PER-Q-CATH DUAL LUMEN PICC CATHETER, MODEL 3246100
K012902 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · LJS · Sep 10, 2001 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
K012902
Device Name
POLY PER-Q-CATH SINGLE LUMEN PICC CATHETER, MODEL 3143100; POLY PER-Q-CATH DUAL LUMEN PICC CATHETER, MODEL 3246100
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
LJS · General Hospital
Decision Date
Sep 10, 2001
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5970
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The modified Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC catheters are intended for short- or long-term peripheral access to the central venous system for intravenous therapy and blood sampling.
Device Story
Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC is an open-ended, polyurethane catheter; radiopaque due to barium sulfate loading. Features include integral extension legs with thumb clamps for fluid control and depth indicators for insertion reference. Provided sterile with hydrophilic stylets; available individually or in procedural kits. Used by clinicians for peripheral access to central venous system; facilitates intravenous therapy and blood sampling. Modified design includes improved strain relief for kink resistance and increased barium sulfate content for enhanced radiographic visualization. Device functions as a conduit for fluids; output is the delivery of therapy or withdrawal of blood samples. Benefits include reliable long-term venous access.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Verification and validation performed per FDA guidance and ISO 10555 standards. Biocompatibility testing conducted per ISO 10993. Performance data demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate and met predetermined acceptance criteria.
Technological Characteristics
Polyurethane catheter; barium sulfate loaded for radiopacity. Open-ended design; 63 cm length. Includes integral extension legs and strain reliefs. Sterilized. ISO 10993 compliant materials. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for short or long term peripheral access to the central venous system for intravenous therapy and blood sampling in patients requiring central venous access. For blood therapy, 4 French or larger catheter recommended.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A percutaneous, implanted, long-term intravascular catheter is a device that consists of a slender tube and any necessary connecting fittings, such as luer hubs, and accessories that facilitate the placement of the device. The device allows for repeated access to the vascular system for long-term use of 30 days or more, and it is intended for administration of fluids, medications, and nutrients; the sampling of blood; and monitoring blood pressure and temperature. The device may be constructed of metal, rubber, plastic, composite materials, or any combination of these materials and may be of single or multiple lumen design.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls) Guidance Document: “Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission for Short-Term and Long-Term Intravascular Catheters.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
(0)2902
Section 6
### 510(k) Summary Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC Catheters
### 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Information 21 CFR 807.92
| 1. Submitter Information: | |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Submitter Name: | Bard Access Systems, Inc. |
| | [Subsidiary of C. R. Bard, Inc.] |
| Address: | 5425 W. Amelia Earhart Drive |
| | Salt Lake City, UT 84116 |
| Telephone Number: | (801) 595-0700, Ext. 4923 |
| Fax Number: | (801) 595 5425 |
| Contact Person: | Stephanie Erskine |
| Date of Preparation: | August 24, 2001 |
| 2. Device Name: | |
Device Name:
28 Aug., 2001
Trade Name: Common/Usual Name: Classification Name:
Catheter) Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC Catheter Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC Long Term Intravascular Catheter (80LJS)
Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Venous
Poly Per-O-Cath PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Venous
Predicate Device: 3. Device Name:
Trade Name:
:
Catheter) Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC Catheter Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC Common/Usual Name: Long Term Intravascular Catheter (80LJS) Classification Name: Premarket Notification: K001901, cleared for marketing on September 19, 2000
#### 4. Device Description
- The Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC Single and Dual Lumen Catheters are open-ended catheters ● extruded from polyurethane loaded with barium sulfate for radiopacity. All are 63 cm in length
- The proximal ends of the catheter tubing are expanded to serve as strain reliefs for their . connection to junctions with integral suture wings
- Integral extension legs are attached to the proximal ends of all SL and DL junctions of PQC . catheters. The extension legs serve as a conduit for fluids into and out of the catheters, and can be occluded with provided thumb clamps
- Catheter tubing is marked with depth indicators, with "0" indicated to serve as a reference for . catheter insertion point
- Catheters are provided sterile with inserted hydrophilic stylets. They are packaged . individually, or sold in procedural kits containing accessories that are provided to aid in their placement
#### 5. Intended Use
The modified Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC catheters are intended for short- or long-term peripheral access to the central venous system for intravenous therapy and blood sampling.
This is the identical intended use for the predicate Poly Per-Q-Cath PICCs. Please note that references to Midlines are not included in this Premarket Notification. Therefore, the Intended Use does not reference Midlines.
## 000046
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Summary of Technological Characteristics in relation to Predicate Device: 6.
### 6.1 Does the new device have the same indication statement?
Yes. The reference to Midlines was removed as Midlines are not included in this Special 510(k) Premarket Notification.
### Does the new device have the same technological characteristics, e.g. design, material, 6.2 etc.?
The basic fundamental scientific technology of the catheters has not changed. The strain relief The basic inindinental occinance resistance to kinking; barium sulfate content has been increased to enhance visualization by radiographic imaging techniques.
#### Could the new characteristics affect safety or effectiveness? 6.3
Yes. The modified strain relief design and the increased barium sulfate content of the catheter could affect safety and effectiveness of the device.
#### Do the new characteristics raise new types of safety and effectiveness questions? 6.4
No. There are no new issues of safety and effectiveness.
## 6.5 Do accepted scientific methods exist for assessing effects of the new characteristics?
Yes. Design validation was performed to meet the recommendations of the FDA guidance document, Design Control Guidance for Medical Device Manufacturers, dated March 11, 1997.
The FDA's Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission for Short-Term and Long-Term Intravascular Catheters, dated 3/16/95, and relevant ISO 10555 Standards were used to determine the appropriate methods for evaluating the modified device's performance.
Biocompatibility requirements of ISO-10993, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing, and the FDA-Modified ISO 10993 Test Profile for externally communicating, blood-contacting, long-term devices, were met. No materials are used in the manufacture of the modified device that have not already been cleared for similar applications by Bard Access Systems.
#### Are performance data available to assess effects of new characteristics? 6.6
Yes. Verification and validation testing was performed according to protocols based on the above-referenced guidance document recommendations and standards, as well as in accordance with in-house protocols. The modified devices met the acceptance criteria for the tests performed.
#### Do performance data demonstrate equivalence? 6.7
Yes. Performance data demonstrated that the modified Poly Per-Q-Cath PICCs are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices and/ or met pre-determined acceptance criteria, and the risks associated with use of the new device were found acceptable when evaluated by FMEA.
#### 7.0 Conclusion
The modified Poly Per-Q-Cath PICCs met predetermined performance acceptance criteria of testing performed and are substantially equivalent to the predicate.
## 000047
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its body and wings. The eagle is enclosed in a circle, and the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" is written around the circumference of the circle.
Public Health Service
92
Ro
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Ms. Stephanie A. Erskine Director of Regulatory Affairs C.R. Bard, Incorporated 5425 West Amelia Earhart Drive Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Re: K012902
Trade/Device Name: Poly Per-Q-Cath Single Lumen PICC Catheter Regulation Number: 880.5970 Regulation Name: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Regulatory Class: II Product Code: LJS Dated: August 28, 2001 Received: August 29, 2001
SEP 1 0 2001
Dear Ms. Erskine:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Erskine
and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (section 531-542 of the Act; 21); CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4618. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html.
Sincere
Timothy A. Ulatowski Director Division of Dental, Infection Control and General Hospital Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
# INDICATION(S) FOR USE STATEMENT*
The Poly Per-Q-Cath PICC is indicated for short or long term peripheral access to the central venous system for intravenous therapy and blood sampling. For blood therapy, it is recommended that a 4 French or larger catheter be used.
Signature of 510(k) Submitter:
Stephanie A. Erskine
101
Printed Name of Submitter:
Stephanie A. Erskine Director, Regulatory Affairs
Date:
*Suggested language and format to meet the requirements of sections 513(i) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, and sections 807.92(a)(5) and 801.4
of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21.
### Concurrence of Office of Device Evaluation
510(k) Number
K012902
Number _
Division Sign-Off Office of Device Evaluation
Prescription Use
OR Over-The-Counter Use
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Dental, Infection Control,
General Hospital Devices K012902
000002
2
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.