DEN210039 · Happiest Baby, Inc. · QTG · Mar 30, 2023 · General Hospital
Device Facts
Record ID
DEN210039
Device Name
SNOO Smart Sleeper
Applicant
Happiest Baby, Inc.
Product Code
QTG · General Hospital
Decision Date
Mar 30, 2023
Decision
DENG
Submission Type
Direct
Regulation
21 CFR 880.5690
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic, Real-World Evidence, Pediatric
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
DEN210039 · Mar 30, 2023
SNOO Smart Sleeper
Happiest Baby, Inc.
User-reported data; Video recordings of infants in home environments; CDC WONDER database (historical control data); Manufacturer-collected real-world user data
The sponsor used real-world data to demonstrate the device's ability to maintain infants in a supine position and to compare the incidence of SIDS/SUID in SNOO users against historical population data to ensure the device does not increase risk.
SIDS/SUID incidence; Supine sleep position; Real-world user cohort; Historical control comparison
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
SNOO User Real-World Evidence Analysis; Retrospective observational cohort study
SNOO Smart Sleeper users (infants 0-6 months); Sample Size: 1,012 users (supine position study); 106,723 users (SIDS/SUID safety analysis); Number of Sites: Not specified (Home use)
Historical data from the CDC WONDER database
Rate of supine sleep position; incidence of SIDS/SUID
Indications for Use
The SNOO Smart Sleeper bassinet plus the SNOO Sleep Sack are jointly intended to facilitate a supine position during sleep. Infants who are placed in a supine sleep position are at lower risk of SIDS/SUID. The device is intended for home use by caregivers of infants from birth to 6 months of age, who are not yet able to roll over consistently.
Device Story
SNOO Smart Sleeper consists of a bassinet and integrated sleep sack; designed to facilitate supine sleep position for infants. Device used in home environment by caregivers. System provides securement to maintain infant on back; intended to reduce risk of SIDS/SUID by preventing rolling. Operates via mechanical structure; includes components for infant containment. Caregivers place infant in sleep sack, which secures to bassinet. Device requires adherence to safe sleep practices and supervision. Benefits include consistent supine positioning for infants unable to roll over independently.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided in the document. FDA requires premarket clinical information to demonstrate the device holds the infant on the back, provide data on adverse events/malfunctions, and demonstrate that use does not increase the rate of SIDS/SUID.
Technological Characteristics
Infant supine sleep system; includes bassinet and sleep sack. Requires biocompatibility evaluation for patient-contacting components. Mechanical stability testing required to prevent tipping. Material compatibility testing required for cleaning durability.
Indications for Use
Indicated for infants from birth to 6 months of age who are not yet able to roll over consistently. Contraindicated for infants who can push up on hands and knees, roll over consistently, or have reached 6 months of age.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The SNOO Smart Sleeper is an infant supine sleep system comprised of a bassinet and a sleep sack that jointly constitute an infant securement device intended to facilitate a supine position during sleep. It is intended for home use by caregivers of infants from birth to 6 months of age who are not yet able to roll over consistently.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the infant supine sleep system is subject to the following special controls:
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# DE NOVO CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FOR SNOO SMART SLEEPER
### REGULATORY INFORMATION
FDA identifies this generic type of device as:
Infant supine sleep system. An infant supine sleep system is a device intended to facilitate a supine position during sleep for use in infants that are not yet able to roll over consistently. Infants placed in a supine sleep position are at lower risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) or sudden unexpected infant death (SUID).
NEW REGULATION NUMBER: 21 CFR 880.5690
CLASSIFICATION: Class II
PRODUCT CODE: OTG
### BACKGROUND
DEVICE NAME: SNOO Smart Sleeper
SUBMISSION NUMBER: DEN210039
DATE DE NOVO RECEIVED: September 20, 2021
### SPONSOR INFORMATION:
Happiest Baby, Inc. 3115 S. La Cienega Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90016
### INDICATIONS FOR USE
The SNOO Smart Sleeper is indicated as follows:
The SNOO Smart Sleeper bassinet plus the SNOO Sleep Sack are jointly intended to facilitate a supine position during sleep. Infants who are placed in a supine sleep position are at lower risk of SIDS/SUID. The device is intended for home use by caregivers of infants from birth to 6 months of age, who are not yet able to roll over consistently.
### LIMITATIONS
The SNOO is demonstrated to facilitate a supine position during sleep; however, the SNOO has not directly demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of SIDS/SUID.
{1}------------------------------------------------
# This device is only indicated for use with infants who cannot consistently roll over.
The device is not a substitute for adult supervision.
Do not use this product if the infant can push up on hands and knees, can roll over consistently, or has reached 6 months of age, whichever comes first.
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The SNOO Smart Sleeper (SNOO) is comprised of the SNOO bassinet and the SNOO Sleep Sack that iointly constitute an infant securement device intended to facilitate a supine position during sleep. The device is intended for home use by caregivers of infants from birth to 6 months of age, who are not yet able to roll over consistently.
The SNOO Sleep Sack is a cotton swaddle with fixed wings made of woven cotton fabric that extend to the right and left of the infant's body. Three sizes of sleep sacks (small 5-12lbs, medium 12-18lbs. and large 18-25lbs) are provided with each bassinet to accommodate the growing baby. Small loops at the end of each SNOO Sleep Sack wing are slid over the safety clips of the SNOO bassinet to securely position the swaddled infant on the back. The SNOO Sleep Sack has corresponding wings that are designed to be physically attached to those clips after the baby is wrapped in the sleep sack - thereby keeping the infant securely positioned on the back during sleep and to prevent rolling.
Image /page/1/Picture/6 description: The image shows a baby swaddled in a white blanket, lying on a black and white patterned surface. The baby is lying on its back, with its head turned to the left. The swaddle is wrapped tightly around the baby's body, with only its head and face visible. The baby appears to be content and relaxed. The black and white patterned surface appears to be a baby lounger.
The SNOO bassinet also provides sound and motion. White noise and rocking can be automatically increased in response to a baby's cries. There is a SNOO App which can be used to adjust the levels of motion.
## SUMMARY OF NONCLINICAL/BENCH STUDIES
## BIOCOMPATIBILITY/MATERIALS
{2}------------------------------------------------
The patient-contacting components of the SNOO Smart Sleeper (SNOO) include the SNOO bassinet fitted sheet and the SNOO Sleep Sack. The SNOO bassinet fitted sheet is made of 100% cotton. and the SNOO Sleep Sack is made of 95% cotton and 5% elastane. and features mesh panels made of 100% polyester. Biocompatibility testing was performed on the patient contacting components of the SNOO. Testing included Cytotoxicity testing per ISO 10993-5:2009 Biological evaluation of medical devices -Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity, sensitization testing per ISO 10993-10:2010 Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization, and irritation testing per ISO 10993-23:2021 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices, Part 23: Tests for Irritation on the final finished device.
# SHELF LIFE
Durability of the SNOO Sleep Sack's zipper and safety loops were evaluated. The effect of washing over the expected lifecycle of the SNOO Sleep Sack and SNOO bassinet fitted sheet was assessed. Use life testing was completed to demonstrate a use life of 6 months.
# ELECTROMAGNETIC CAPABILITY & ELECTRICAL SAFETY
Electrical safety testing was performed in accordance with the following standards:
- . BS EN 61558-1 Safety of transformers, reactors, power supply units and combinations thereof - General requirements and tests
- . BS EN 61558-2-16 Safety of transformers, reactors, power supply units and combinations thereof - Part 2-16: Particular requirements and tests for switch mode power supply units and transformers for switch mode power supply units for general applications.
- . UL 1310 - Class 2 Power Units CAN/CSA C22.2 No. 223 - Power Supplies with Extra-low Voltage Class 2 Outputs.
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing was conducted per the FDA Recommended Standard IEC 60601-1-2. The SNOO Smart Sleeper demonstrated that it complies with the emission limits conducted for CISPR 11. Additionally, conducted and radiated emissions testing was performed per CFR 47 FCC Part 15. Subpart B. which included EMC testing to the same frequencies (0.15 MHz- 30MHz) and acceptance limits as IEC 60601-1-2.
# PERFORMANCE TESTING - BENCH
The SNOO Smart Sleeper bassinet was tested in accordance with ASTM F2194-16e1 (Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Bassinets and Cradles) and 16 CFR 1218 (Requirements for bassinets and cradles).
The SNOO Sleep Sack was tested as described in the table below.
{3}------------------------------------------------
| Test<br>Performed | Device<br>Description /<br>Sample Size | Test<br>Method | Acceptance<br>Criteria | Results<br>(PASS/ FAIL) |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Zipper<br>Durability<br>Test | 10 zippers /<br>batch | Open and close the zipper 500 times at<br>an approximate speed of 10cm/sec. | 500 cycles without<br>any jamming or<br>breaking issues. | PASS |
| Loop Hook<br>&<br>Unhooking | 3 SNOO<br>Sacks<br>(1 Small.<br>1 Medium,<br>1 Large) | Perform 500 hook and unhook cycles<br>on SNOO Sleep Sack elastic loops to<br>the safety clips, per the IFU<br>instructions. | Visual Inspection<br>for deterioration of<br>components after<br>500 hook and<br>unhook cycles. | PASS |
| Washing<br>Durability<br>Test | 10 pieces /<br>batch | Utilizing any commercial large<br>washing machine and household<br>clothes drying machine, wash and dry<br>the Sleep Sack for 100 cycles. After<br>every 10 cycles, measure the<br>dimensions. | Dimension<br>deviates less than<br>10%, except for<br>safety clip width<br>(<5%). | PASS |
| Velcro<br>Durability<br>Test | 10 pieces /<br>batch | After a wash and dry cycle, perform<br>open and close cycles on the hook<br>(male) and loop (female) Velcro strips. | Velcro adheres at<br>360 uses. | PASS |
# HUMAN FACTORS USABILITY TESTING
A Human Factors validation study was completed in accordance with the FDA 2016 guidance "Applying Human Factors and Usability Engineering to Medical Devices". The study encompassed a series of scenarios in a simulated use environment that contained tasks related to use of the system by its intended users. The scenarios were tied to the risk analysis process and included user tasks that are typically done when using the system. Fifteen test participants were evaluated on tasks that included unpacking the SNOO, setting up the system, swaddling a baby (doll) in the SNOO Sleep Sack, securing the baby (doll) in the SNOO bassinet, and properly removing the baby (doll) from the device. The validation study met the acceptance criteria and was deemed acceptable.
# SUMMARY OF CLINICAL INFORMATION
Happiest Baby provided real world evidence (RWE) showing a rate of supine sleep position of approximately 98.7% in 1012 users (confidence interval [97.8%,99.2%]). In addition, over 93 hours of video recordings showed all observed infants remaining in a supine position during their time in the SNOO. In addition, Happiest Baby provided real-world evidence on 106,723 SNOO users and compared the incidence of reported SIDS/SUID in SNOO users to historical data from the CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research (WONDER) database. Although the data was not of sufficient quality to determine a precise SIDS/SUID rate, it did demonstrate that the device did not increase the risk of SIDS/SUID in the study population.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The following adverse events, including serious adverse events, have been reported at or below expected rates when using the SNOO Smart Sleeper: death, gastroesophageal reflux, plagiocephaly, aspiration, contusion, and dermatitis.
## POSTMARKET SURVEILLANCE
The clinical data described above were collected in the United States but did not evaluate the device in a population that is reflective of the entire US population, including the US subpopulations at highest risk of SIDS/SUID. A section 522 postmarket surveillance study will therefore be required to obtain a more comprehensive safety profile of the device by collecting safety data associated with use of the device in US subpopulations at higher risk of SIDS/SUID to determine the rates of serious injury and death for high-risk infants when they use the SNOO Smart Sleeper. Safety data will be collected and provided in updated labeling.
# LABELING
The device labeling includes the following:
- On the packaging and in directions for use, a prominent warning that the device has not a. been demonstrated to reduce the risk of SIDS/SUID:
- b. A summary of available clinical data with the device, including a discussion of adverse events:
- c. A warning that the device is only indicated for use with infants who cannot consistently roll over:
- d. The level of supervision necessary to monitor a sleeping infant in the intended use environment:
- e. Recommendations for safe sleep environments;
- f. Instructions and guidelines to ensure proper fit of the infant into the sleep system; and
- g. Instructions for maintaining and reprocessing the device.
## RISKS TO HEALTH
The table below identifies the risks to health that may be associated with use of an Infant Supine Sleep System.
## Risk and Mitigation Table
| Risk to Health | Mitigation Measures |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Increased risk of death, including from<br>inadequate securement or inadequate<br>positioning of the infant | Clinical data<br>Postmarket surveillance<br>Non-clinical performance testing<br>Labeling |
| Inappropriate securement leading to<br>Injuries, contusions, or bruising Entrapment | Clinical data<br>Postmarket surveillance<br>Labeling |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Risk to Health | Mitigation Measures |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| • Respiratory compromise or suffocation<br>• Gastroesophageal reflux<br>• Plagiocephaly (“flat head syndrome”)<br>• Death | |
| Inappropriate or inadequate securement due to<br>device degradation over time (wear and tear,<br>laundering) | Non-clinical performance testing<br>Labeling |
| Inappropriate use or inadequate securement due<br>to use error and/or improper fit | Clinical data<br>Human factors assessment<br>Labeling |
| Injury due to unstable device (tipping, rocking,<br>improper placement) | Non-clinical performance testing<br>Labeling |
| Infection | Labeling |
| Adverse tissue reaction (e.g., dermatitis) | Biocompatibility evaluation<br>Labeling |
# SPECIAL CONTROLS
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the infant supine sleep system is subject to the following special controls:
- Premarket clinical information and, as determined by FDA, postmarket surveillance data (1) acquired under anticipated conditions of use must be collected to fulfill the following:
- Demonstrate that the device holds the infant on the back; (i)
- Provide data on adverse events (including deaths and injuries) and malfunctions to (ii) demonstrate the device can be safely used in the intended use population; and
- (iii) Provide data to demonstrate that use of the device does not increase the rate of SIDS/SUID in the intended use population.
- Human factors testing must demonstrate that the user can safely and correctly use the (2) device.
- The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be (3) biocompatible.
- (4) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following must be conducted:
- (i) Testing to ensure the mechanical and structural stability of the device and demonstrate that the device does not present a tipping hazard due to mechanical failures; and
- Material compatibility testing to demonstrate that the cleaning instructions provided (ii) by the manufacturer do not cause crazing, cracking, or deterioration of the device.
- Labeling must include: (5)
{6}------------------------------------------------
- (i) Unless clinical performance data demonstrates that it can be removed or modified, a prominent warning that the device has not been demonstrated to reduce the risk of SIDS/SUID. Such warning must appear prominently on all labeling:
- (ii) A summary of available clinical information with the device, including a discussion of adverse events:
- A warning that the device is only indicated for use with infants who cannot (111) consistently roll over;
- (iv) Instructions to ensure proper fit;
- (v) Instructions for cleaning the device; and
- (vi) Information regarding safe sleep practices to ensure the safe use of the device, including:
- (A) Recommendations for safe sleep environments; and
- The level of supervision necessary to monitor a sleeping infant. (B)
## BENEFIT-RISK DETERMINATION
The probable benefits of the device are based on clinical data, as described above. The data demonstrated that the SNOO Smart Sleeper secures the infant in a supine position during sleep. Infants who are placed in a supine sleep position are at lower risk of SIDS/SUID (Moon, R. Y .. et al. (2022). "Sleep-Related Infant Deaths: Updated 2022 Recommendations for Reducing Infant Deaths in the Sleep Environment." Pediatrics 150(1).).
The probable risks of the device are also based on clinical data. A securement device that is misused or poorly fitted presents risks to the infant such as entrapment, suffocation, and SIDS/SUID. Plagiocephaly, also known as flat head syndrome, may occur as a result of placement in the supine position for an extended period of time. Gastroesophageal reflux was also observed. These two were the most common risks. Contusion, aspiration and dermatitis were also observed, but to a lesser extent.
The data collected for the SNOO Smart Sleeper did not demonstrate that use of the device decreased the risk of SIDS/SUID, and the device was not extensively studied in infants demographically at highest risk of SIDS/SUID. However, the data did demonstrate that the device could secure an infant on its back. Safe to Sleep guidelines state that placing infants on the back to sleep is associated with lower rates of SIDS/SUID (https://safetosleep.nichd.nih.gov/). The risks reported from the study were well understood and in line with historical data and clinical experience. FDA has determined that while additional data are necessary to further assess the benefits and risks of the device in the most vulnerable infants, the benefits of the device outweigh its risks as studied.
In order to mitigate the risks of a securement device, caregivers should read the directions for use carefully and ensure that the device is used accordingly and with appropriate supervision. Safe to Sleep guidelines continue to recommend that an infant be placed on its back to sleep with no other objects in the crib.
### Patient Perspectives
{7}------------------------------------------------
This submission did not include specific information on patient perspectives for this device.
### Benefit/Risk Conclusion
In conclusion, given the available information above, for the following indication statement:
The SNOO Smart Sleeper bassinet plus the SNOO Sleep Sack are jointly intended to facilitate a supine position during sleep. Infants who are placed in a supine sleep position are at lower risk of SIDS/SUID. The device is intended for home use by caregivers of infants from birth to 6 months of age, who are not yet able to roll over consistently.
The probable benefits outweigh the probable risks for the SNOO Smart Sleeper. The device provides benefits and the risks can be mitigated by the use of general controls and the identified special controls.
### CONCLUSION
The De Novo request for the SNOO Smart Sleeper is granted and the device is classified as follows:
Product Code: QTG Device Type: Infant supine sleep system Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.5690 Class: II
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.